×




Zuora in 2017: Leading the Subscription Economy Revolution Negotiation Strategy / MBA Resources

Introduction to Negotiation Strategy

Negotiation Strategy solution for Zuora in 2017: Leading the Subscription Economy Revolution case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Negotiation Strategy and other business case study solution. Zuora in 2017: Leading the Subscription Economy Revolution case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Robert A. Burgelman, Robert Siegel, Julie Makinen. The Zuora in 2017: Leading the Subscription Economy Revolution (referred as “Zuora Tzuo” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - negotiation strategy, negotiation framework, Financial markets, Growth strategy, Leadership, Leadership development, Sales, Strategic thinking, Strategy execution, Technology.

Negotiation strategy solution for case study Zuora in 2017: Leading the Subscription Economy Revolution ” provides a comprehensive framework to analyse all issues at hand and reach a unambiguous negotiated agreement. At Oak Spring University, we provide comprehensive negotiation strategies that have proven their worth both in the academic sphere and corporate world.


BATNA in Negotiation Strategy


Three questions every negotiator should ask before entering into a negotiation process-

What’s my BATNA (Best Alternative To a Negotiated Agreement) – my walkaway option if the deal fails?

What are my most important interests, in ranked order?

What is the other side’s BATNA, and what are his interests?



12 Hrs

$59.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now

24 Hrs

$49.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now

48 Hrs

$39.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now




Case Description of Zuora in 2017: Leading the Subscription Economy Revolution Case Study


Long before Spotify had become a household name, and when Netflix was still mailing off DVDs to customers' homes, Tien Tzuo had foreseen a major transformation in the business world: from one-off sales to subscription business models. He realized that no one was making billing software to serve the complex needs of such companies, so he founded Zuora in 2007 to automate billing, commerce, and finance operations for companies built on a recurring revenue model. Initially, Zuora catered mostly to start-ups, but the world rapidly evolved. By 2017 its customers included companies such as Box, the Financial Times, Ford, GM, GE, Caterpillar, and Zendesk. In 2016, Zuora had crossed a major threshold: $100 million in annual recurring revenue. In 2017, Tzuo could see that Zuora was positioned to hit $300 million, and before then, he believed he would take Zuora public. The company was growing rapidly, and Tzuo had begun that he needed to approach this next phase of scaling more deliberately than he had with Zuora's early growth. "A company that is going from $100 million to $300 million has to be different than a company going from $30 million to $100 million," said Tzuo. "That $30 million to $100 million was a sprint; making the transition from $30 million, we were not so thoughtful. I wanted to be more thoughtful this time." In 2014, Tzuo had identified four major areas in which the company needed to transform: sales, finance, products, and people. Tzuo knew the transformation plan meant he would have to make a wave of leadership changes, managing hirings and terminations. And he would have to change his own leadership style to match the company's increasing size. Meanwhile, he had to think strategically about how Zuora could fend off challenges both from software behemoths like Salesforce.com and Oracle, and nimble upstarts. To successfully IPO, and satisfy investors over the long term, Tzuo knew that Zuora had to deliver consistency and predictability. "What's at the top of my mind is how do we build predictability into the machine?" he said. "Can we build a company that just consistently is very boring, that delivers 30 percent annual growth over the next decade?"


Case Authors : Robert A. Burgelman, Robert Siegel, Julie Makinen

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas : Financial markets, Growth strategy, Leadership, Leadership development, Sales, Strategic thinking, Strategy execution, Technology




Seven Elemental Tools of Negotiation that can be used in Zuora in 2017: Leading the Subscription Economy Revolution solution


1. Satisfies everyone’s core interests (yours and theirs)


By interests, we do not mean the preconceived demands or positions that you or the other party may have, but rather the underlying needs, aims, fears, and concerns that shape what you want. Negotiation is more than getting what you want. It is not winning at all cost. Number of times Win-Win is better option that outright winning or getting what you want.





2. Is the best of many options

Options are the solutions you generate that could meet your and your counterpart’s interests . Often people come to negotiations with very fixed ideas and things they want to achieve. This strategy leaves unexplored options which might be even better than the one that one party wanted to achieve. So always try to provide as many options as possible during the negotiation process. The best outcome should be out of many options rather than few options.


3. Meets legitimate, fair standards

When soft bargainers meet hard bargainers there is always the danger of soft bargainers ceding more than what is necessary. To avoid this scenario you should always focus on legitimate standards or expectations. Standards are often external and objective measures to assess the fairness such as rules and regulations, financial values & resources , market prices etc. If the negotiated agreement is going beyond the industry norms or established standards of fairness then it is prudent to get out of the negotiation.


4. Is better than your alternatives or BATNA

Every negotiators going into the negotiations should always work out the “what if” scenario. The negotiating parties in the “Zuora in 2017: Leading the Subscription Economy Revolution” has three to four plausible scenarios. The negotiating protagonist needs to have clear idea of – what will happen if the negotiations fail. To put it in the negotiating literature – BATNA - Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement. If the negotiated agreement is not better than BATNA then there is no point in accepting the negotiated solution.


5. Is comprised of clear, realistic commitments

One of the biggest problems in implementing the negotiated agreements in corporate world is – the ambiguity in the negotiated agreement. Sometimes the negotiated agreements are not realistic or various parties interpret the outcomes based on their understanding of the situation. It is critical to do negotiations as water tight as possible so that there is less scope for ambiguity.


6. Is the result of effective communication?

Many negotiators make the mistake of focusing only on the substance of the negotiation (interests, options, standards, and so on). How you communicate about that substance, however, can make all the difference. The language you use and the way that you build understanding, jointly solve problems, and together determine the process of the negotiation with your counterpart make your negotiation more efficient, yield clear agreements that each party understands, and help you build better relationships.


7. Managing relationship with counterparty

Another critical factor in the success of your negotiation is how you manage your relationship with your counterpart. According to “Robert A. Burgelman, Robert Siegel, Julie Makinen”, the protagonist may want to establish a new connection or repair a damaged one; in any case, you want to build a strong working relationship built on mutual respect, well-established trust, and a side-by-side problem- solving approach.




Different types of negotiators – what is your style of negotiation

According to Harvard Business Review , there are three types of negotiators – Hard Bargainers, Soft Bargainers, and Principled Bargainers.

Hard Bargainers – These people see negotiations as an activity that they need to win. They are less focused less on the real objectives of the negotiations but more on winning. In the “Zuora in 2017: Leading the Subscription Economy Revolution ”, do you think a hard bargaining strategy will deliver desired results? Hard bargainers are easy to negotiate with as they often have a very predictable strategy

Soft Bargainers – These people are focused on relationship rather than hard outcomes of the negotiations. It doesn’t mean they are pushovers. These negotiators often scribe to long term relationship rather than immediate bargain.

Principled Bargainers – As explained in the seven elemental tools of negotiations above, these negotiators are more concern about the standards and norms of fairness. They often have inclusive approach to negotiations and like to work on numerous solutions that can improve the BATNA of both parties.

Open lines of communication between parties in the case study “Zuora in 2017: Leading the Subscription Economy Revolution” can make for an effective negotiation strategy and will make it easier to negotiate with this party the next time as well.





NPV Analysis of Zuora in 2017: Leading the Subscription Economy Revolution



References & Further Readings

Robert A. Burgelman, Robert Siegel, Julie Makinen (2018), "Zuora in 2017: Leading the Subscription Economy Revolution Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Morgan Stanley SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Investment Services


Akikawa Foods & Farms SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


CDS Co Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Loctek Ergonomic Tech A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Furniture & Fixtures


Aju Capital SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Consumer Financial Services


Sensient Technologies SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


Lend Lease Group SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Unisplendour Corp Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Peripherals