×




Anhui LIGOO: A Battery Management System for New Energy Vehicles Negotiation Strategy / MBA Resources

Introduction to Negotiation Strategy

Negotiation Strategy solution for Anhui LIGOO: A Battery Management System for New Energy Vehicles case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Negotiation Strategy and other business case study solution. Anhui LIGOO: A Battery Management System for New Energy Vehicles case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Jin Hong, Ping Deng, Zheng Zhao, Hao Lu. The Anhui LIGOO: A Battery Management System for New Energy Vehicles (referred as “Ligoo Bms” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Strategy & Execution. It also touches upon business topics such as - negotiation strategy, negotiation framework, Competitive strategy, Technology.

Negotiation strategy solution for case study Anhui LIGOO: A Battery Management System for New Energy Vehicles ” provides a comprehensive framework to analyse all issues at hand and reach a unambiguous negotiated agreement. At Oak Spring University, we provide comprehensive negotiation strategies that have proven their worth both in the academic sphere and corporate world.


BATNA in Negotiation Strategy


Three questions every negotiator should ask before entering into a negotiation process-

What’s my BATNA (Best Alternative To a Negotiated Agreement) – my walkaway option if the deal fails?

What are my most important interests, in ranked order?

What is the other side’s BATNA, and what are his interests?



12 Hrs

$59.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now

24 Hrs

$49.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now

48 Hrs

$39.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now




Case Description of Anhui LIGOO: A Battery Management System for New Energy Vehicles Case Study


Anhui LIGOO New Energy Technology Co., Ltd. (LIGOO) had survived and made developments in the field of battery management systems (BMS) in the changing environment of new energy vehicles (NEVs), amid policy adjustment in China. Established in 2010, LIGOO had achieved a respectable market share and acquired a reputation as possessing excellent BMS technology in the electric vehicle industry. However, due to a cold market in the industry and weak reception for these vehicles, LIGOO's performance began to decline. The company made its first transformation, applying BMS technology to the communications and coal mining industries, enabling LIGOO's survival and ability to improve BMS technology when many other BMS technology companies were going bankrupt. In 2013 and 2014, the Chinese government began to enhance its support for the NEV industry, prompting LIGOO's chief executive officer to consider whether LIGOO should continue its existing business in the communications and coal mining industries or rejoin the NEV industry. Jin Hong and Ping Deng and Zheng Zhao are affiliated with University of Science and Technology of China. Hao Lu is affiliated with Room 604, School of Management. Xiumei Guo is affiliated with Curtin University.


Case Authors : Jin Hong, Ping Deng, Zheng Zhao, Hao Lu

Topic : Strategy & Execution

Related Areas : Competitive strategy, Technology




Seven Elemental Tools of Negotiation that can be used in Anhui LIGOO: A Battery Management System for New Energy Vehicles solution


1. Satisfies everyone’s core interests (yours and theirs)


By interests, we do not mean the preconceived demands or positions that you or the other party may have, but rather the underlying needs, aims, fears, and concerns that shape what you want. Negotiation is more than getting what you want. It is not winning at all cost. Number of times Win-Win is better option that outright winning or getting what you want.





2. Is the best of many options

Options are the solutions you generate that could meet your and your counterpart’s interests . Often people come to negotiations with very fixed ideas and things they want to achieve. This strategy leaves unexplored options which might be even better than the one that one party wanted to achieve. So always try to provide as many options as possible during the negotiation process. The best outcome should be out of many options rather than few options.


3. Meets legitimate, fair standards

When soft bargainers meet hard bargainers there is always the danger of soft bargainers ceding more than what is necessary. To avoid this scenario you should always focus on legitimate standards or expectations. Standards are often external and objective measures to assess the fairness such as rules and regulations, financial values & resources , market prices etc. If the negotiated agreement is going beyond the industry norms or established standards of fairness then it is prudent to get out of the negotiation.


4. Is better than your alternatives or BATNA

Every negotiators going into the negotiations should always work out the “what if” scenario. The negotiating parties in the “Anhui LIGOO: A Battery Management System for New Energy Vehicles” has three to four plausible scenarios. The negotiating protagonist needs to have clear idea of – what will happen if the negotiations fail. To put it in the negotiating literature – BATNA - Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement. If the negotiated agreement is not better than BATNA then there is no point in accepting the negotiated solution.


5. Is comprised of clear, realistic commitments

One of the biggest problems in implementing the negotiated agreements in corporate world is – the ambiguity in the negotiated agreement. Sometimes the negotiated agreements are not realistic or various parties interpret the outcomes based on their understanding of the situation. It is critical to do negotiations as water tight as possible so that there is less scope for ambiguity.


6. Is the result of effective communication?

Many negotiators make the mistake of focusing only on the substance of the negotiation (interests, options, standards, and so on). How you communicate about that substance, however, can make all the difference. The language you use and the way that you build understanding, jointly solve problems, and together determine the process of the negotiation with your counterpart make your negotiation more efficient, yield clear agreements that each party understands, and help you build better relationships.


7. Managing relationship with counterparty

Another critical factor in the success of your negotiation is how you manage your relationship with your counterpart. According to “Jin Hong, Ping Deng, Zheng Zhao, Hao Lu”, the protagonist may want to establish a new connection or repair a damaged one; in any case, you want to build a strong working relationship built on mutual respect, well-established trust, and a side-by-side problem- solving approach.




Different types of negotiators – what is your style of negotiation

According to Harvard Business Review , there are three types of negotiators – Hard Bargainers, Soft Bargainers, and Principled Bargainers.

Hard Bargainers – These people see negotiations as an activity that they need to win. They are less focused less on the real objectives of the negotiations but more on winning. In the “Anhui LIGOO: A Battery Management System for New Energy Vehicles ”, do you think a hard bargaining strategy will deliver desired results? Hard bargainers are easy to negotiate with as they often have a very predictable strategy

Soft Bargainers – These people are focused on relationship rather than hard outcomes of the negotiations. It doesn’t mean they are pushovers. These negotiators often scribe to long term relationship rather than immediate bargain.

Principled Bargainers – As explained in the seven elemental tools of negotiations above, these negotiators are more concern about the standards and norms of fairness. They often have inclusive approach to negotiations and like to work on numerous solutions that can improve the BATNA of both parties.

Open lines of communication between parties in the case study “Anhui LIGOO: A Battery Management System for New Energy Vehicles” can make for an effective negotiation strategy and will make it easier to negotiate with this party the next time as well.





NPV Analysis of Anhui LIGOO: A Battery Management System for New Energy Vehicles



References & Further Readings

Jin Hong, Ping Deng, Zheng Zhao, Hao Lu (2018), "Anhui LIGOO: A Battery Management System for New Energy Vehicles Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Western Asset SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


Das Intellitech A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


HNA Investment SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


SK Discovery SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Utilities , Natural Gas Utilities


Nippon Light Metal Holdings Co. SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


Edaran Bhd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Services


Ansys SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Misc. Fabricated Products