Introduction to Negotiation Strategy
At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Negotiation Strategy and other business case study solution. Great Eastern Toys (A) case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Gabriel Hawawini, Lee Remmers. The Great Eastern Toys (A) (referred as “Toys Kong” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Finance & Accounting. It also touches upon business topics such as - negotiation strategy, negotiation framework, Financial management, Risk management.
Negotiation strategy solution for case study Great Eastern Toys (A) ” provides a comprehensive framework to analyse all issues at hand and reach a unambiguous negotiated agreement. At Oak Spring University, we provide comprehensive negotiation strategies that have proven their worth both in the academic sphere and corporate world.
What’s my BATNA (Best Alternative To a Negotiated Agreement) – my walkaway option if the deal fails?
What are my most important interests, in ranked order?
What is the other side’s BATNA, and what are his interests?
This is a series of four case studies illustrating a number of key financial issues facing many small to medium sized companies. The setting is Hong Kong, but the concerns of the company's management are universal: financing growth, measuring performance, deciding whether or not to invest in a new product, valuation of the company for a possible sale, dealing with currency risk. Company Situation In late July 1998, the senior management of Great Eastern Toys, a medium-sized, family-owned company with annual sales of over HK$245 millions (US$31 million) from designing and distributing children's toys, books, and games was reviewing recent performance and future operations. The company exported about 50% of its products to North American markets, close to 50% to major department stores and distributors in Europe, and less than 5% in the local market. Its principal suppliers were in Hong Kong; it financed its operations mainly with the local currency, Hong Kong dollars, but also with Yen loans. Great Eastern Toys (A) The company had enjoyed substantial growth following management changes in 1996, Management's attention had been focused on expanding sales, leading them to ignore a large increase in working capital needs. These had been financed mainly with short term bank borrowing. The economic crisis in Hong Kong in 1998 led the company's banks to ask that loans be substantially reduced with potentially serious liquidity consequences for the firm. The "A" case focuses on how to deal with these developments. Students are asked to evaluate the company's situation using standard tools of financial analysis: ratio, cash flow, and profitability analysis. Two class sessions are normally needed for adequate discussion of the various issues arising in the case.
By interests, we do not mean the preconceived demands or positions that you or the other party may have, but rather the underlying needs, aims, fears, and concerns that shape what you want. Negotiation is more than getting what you want. It is not winning at all cost. Number of times Win-Win is better option that outright winning or getting what you want.
Options are the solutions you generate that could meet your and your counterpart’s interests . Often people come to negotiations with very fixed ideas and things they want to achieve. This strategy leaves unexplored options which might be even better than the one that one party wanted to achieve. So always try to provide as many options as possible during the negotiation process. The best outcome should be out of many options rather than few options.
When soft bargainers meet hard bargainers there is always the danger of soft bargainers ceding more than what is necessary. To avoid this scenario you should always focus on legitimate standards or expectations. Standards are often external and objective measures to assess the fairness such as rules and regulations, financial values & resources , market prices etc. If the negotiated agreement is going beyond the industry norms or established standards of fairness then it is prudent to get out of the negotiation.
Every negotiators going into the negotiations should always work out the “what if” scenario. The negotiating parties in the “Great Eastern Toys (A)” has three to four plausible scenarios. The negotiating protagonist needs to have clear idea of – what will happen if the negotiations fail. To put it in the negotiating literature – BATNA - Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement. If the negotiated agreement is not better than BATNA then there is no point in accepting the negotiated solution.
One of the biggest problems in implementing the negotiated agreements in corporate world is – the ambiguity in the negotiated agreement. Sometimes the negotiated agreements are not realistic or various parties interpret the outcomes based on their understanding of the situation. It is critical to do negotiations as water tight as possible so that there is less scope for ambiguity.
Many negotiators make the mistake of focusing only on the substance of the negotiation (interests, options, standards, and so on). How you communicate about that substance, however, can make all the difference. The language you use and the way that you build understanding, jointly solve problems, and together determine the process of the negotiation with your counterpart make your negotiation more efficient, yield clear agreements that each party understands, and help you build better relationships.
Another critical factor in the success of your negotiation is how you manage your relationship with your counterpart. According to “Gabriel Hawawini, Lee Remmers”, the protagonist may want to establish a new connection or repair a damaged one; in any case, you want to build a strong working relationship built on mutual respect, well-established trust, and a side-by-side problem- solving approach.
According to
Harvard Business Review
, there are three types of negotiators – Hard Bargainers, Soft Bargainers, and Principled Bargainers.
Hard Bargainers – These people see negotiations as an activity that they need to win. They are less focused less on the real objectives of the negotiations but more on winning. In the “Great Eastern Toys (A) ”, do you think a hard bargaining strategy will deliver desired results? Hard bargainers are easy to negotiate with as they often have a very
predictable strategy
Soft Bargainers – These people are focused on relationship rather than hard outcomes of the negotiations. It doesn’t mean they are pushovers. These negotiators often scribe to long term relationship rather than immediate bargain.
Principled Bargainers – As explained in the seven elemental tools of negotiations above, these negotiators are more concern about the standards and norms of fairness. They often have inclusive approach to negotiations and like to work on numerous solutions that can improve the BATNA of both parties.
Open lines of communication between parties in the case study “Great Eastern Toys (A)” can make for an effective negotiation strategy and will make it easier to negotiate with this party the next time as well.
Gabriel Hawawini, Lee Remmers (2018), "Great Eastern Toys (A) Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.
Feel free to connect with us if you need business research.
You can download Excel Template of Case Study Solution & Analysis of Great Eastern Toys (A)
Services , Business Services
Technology , Software & Programming
Services , Business Services
Technology , Computer Services
Financial , Regional Banks
Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Beverages (Alcoholic)
Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing
Financial , Insurance (Life)
Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Personal & Household Prods.
Financial , Consumer Financial Services
