Introduction to Negotiation Strategy
At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Negotiation Strategy and other business case study solution. Anti-trust and Competitive Issues in B2B Trading Exchanges: Covisint, Inc. case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Ali F. Farhoomand, Mary Ho, Phoebe Ho. The Anti-trust and Competitive Issues in B2B Trading Exchanges: Covisint, Inc. (referred as “Ftc Covisint” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Global Business. It also touches upon business topics such as - negotiation strategy, negotiation framework, Business models, Supply chain.
Negotiation strategy solution for case study Anti-trust and Competitive Issues in B2B Trading Exchanges: Covisint, Inc. ” provides a comprehensive framework to analyse all issues at hand and reach a unambiguous negotiated agreement. At Oak Spring University, we provide comprehensive negotiation strategies that have proven their worth both in the academic sphere and corporate world.
What’s my BATNA (Best Alternative To a Negotiated Agreement) – my walkaway option if the deal fails?
What are my most important interests, in ranked order?
What is the other side’s BATNA, and what are his interests?
In February 2000, DaimlerChrysler, Ford Motor Co., and General Motors Co. jointly announced plans to combine efforts and form a global online business-to-business (B2B) exchange. The goal of the exchange was to provide original equipment manufacturers and suppliers with the ability to reduce costs in their respective supply chains and bring efficiencies to their business operations. A few months after the announcement, Renault S.A., Nissan Japan, and several top-tier automotive parts suppliers voiced their support and planned to join the exchange. The founders coined the name "Covisint" for the exchange. In July 2000, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) in Washington, DC launched an investigation into Covisint's structure and mission, to explore any possible antitrust implications. The FTC was aware that Covisint's founders represented a large share of the automotive market. Given the influence of the big players, the FTC feared that small companies could be excluded from the market and that the exchange could provide a channel for the improper transfer of sensitive information among the participants. Covisint was the first B2B venture to be reviewed by the FTC. The outcome of the case and the issues raised sparked widespread debate about how, or whether, the B2B industry should be regulated by antitrust provisions. The case also raised concerns from companies that intend to invest or participate in B2B trading platforms.
By interests, we do not mean the preconceived demands or positions that you or the other party may have, but rather the underlying needs, aims, fears, and concerns that shape what you want. Negotiation is more than getting what you want. It is not winning at all cost. Number of times Win-Win is better option that outright winning or getting what you want.
Options are the solutions you generate that could meet your and your counterpart’s interests . Often people come to negotiations with very fixed ideas and things they want to achieve. This strategy leaves unexplored options which might be even better than the one that one party wanted to achieve. So always try to provide as many options as possible during the negotiation process. The best outcome should be out of many options rather than few options.
When soft bargainers meet hard bargainers there is always the danger of soft bargainers ceding more than what is necessary. To avoid this scenario you should always focus on legitimate standards or expectations. Standards are often external and objective measures to assess the fairness such as rules and regulations, financial values & resources , market prices etc. If the negotiated agreement is going beyond the industry norms or established standards of fairness then it is prudent to get out of the negotiation.
Every negotiators going into the negotiations should always work out the “what if” scenario. The negotiating parties in the “Anti-trust and Competitive Issues in B2B Trading Exchanges: Covisint, Inc.” has three to four plausible scenarios. The negotiating protagonist needs to have clear idea of – what will happen if the negotiations fail. To put it in the negotiating literature – BATNA - Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement. If the negotiated agreement is not better than BATNA then there is no point in accepting the negotiated solution.
One of the biggest problems in implementing the negotiated agreements in corporate world is – the ambiguity in the negotiated agreement. Sometimes the negotiated agreements are not realistic or various parties interpret the outcomes based on their understanding of the situation. It is critical to do negotiations as water tight as possible so that there is less scope for ambiguity.
Many negotiators make the mistake of focusing only on the substance of the negotiation (interests, options, standards, and so on). How you communicate about that substance, however, can make all the difference. The language you use and the way that you build understanding, jointly solve problems, and together determine the process of the negotiation with your counterpart make your negotiation more efficient, yield clear agreements that each party understands, and help you build better relationships.
Another critical factor in the success of your negotiation is how you manage your relationship with your counterpart. According to “Ali F. Farhoomand, Mary Ho, Phoebe Ho”, the protagonist may want to establish a new connection or repair a damaged one; in any case, you want to build a strong working relationship built on mutual respect, well-established trust, and a side-by-side problem- solving approach.
According to
Harvard Business Review
, there are three types of negotiators – Hard Bargainers, Soft Bargainers, and Principled Bargainers.
Hard Bargainers – These people see negotiations as an activity that they need to win. They are less focused less on the real objectives of the negotiations but more on winning. In the “Anti-trust and Competitive Issues in B2B Trading Exchanges: Covisint, Inc. ”, do you think a hard bargaining strategy will deliver desired results? Hard bargainers are easy to negotiate with as they often have a very
predictable strategy
Soft Bargainers – These people are focused on relationship rather than hard outcomes of the negotiations. It doesn’t mean they are pushovers. These negotiators often scribe to long term relationship rather than immediate bargain.
Principled Bargainers – As explained in the seven elemental tools of negotiations above, these negotiators are more concern about the standards and norms of fairness. They often have inclusive approach to negotiations and like to work on numerous solutions that can improve the BATNA of both parties.
Open lines of communication between parties in the case study “Anti-trust and Competitive Issues in B2B Trading Exchanges: Covisint, Inc.” can make for an effective negotiation strategy and will make it easier to negotiate with this party the next time as well.
Ali F. Farhoomand, Mary Ho, Phoebe Ho (2018), "Anti-trust and Competitive Issues in B2B Trading Exchanges: Covisint, Inc. Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.
Feel free to connect with us if you need business research.
You can download Excel Template of Case Study Solution & Analysis of Anti-trust and Competitive Issues in B2B Trading Exchanges: Covisint, Inc.
Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls
Services , Real Estate Operations
Technology , Software & Programming
Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods
Services , Restaurants
Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods
Energy , Oil Well Services & Equipment
Financial , Insurance (Life)
Basic Materials , Containers & Packaging
Technology , Scientific & Technical Instr.
Financial , Investment Services
