×




Sanlu's Melamine-Tainted Milk Crisis in China Negotiation Strategy / MBA Resources

Introduction to Negotiation Strategy

Negotiation Strategy solution for Sanlu's Melamine-Tainted Milk Crisis in China case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Negotiation Strategy and other business case study solution. Sanlu's Melamine-Tainted Milk Crisis in China case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Jiangyong Lu, Zhigang Tao, Claudia H. L. Woo. The Sanlu's Melamine-Tainted Milk Crisis in China (referred as “Sanlu Melamine” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Global Business. It also touches upon business topics such as - negotiation strategy, negotiation framework, Ethics, Government, Marketing, Social enterprise, Supply chain.

Negotiation strategy solution for case study Sanlu's Melamine-Tainted Milk Crisis in China ” provides a comprehensive framework to analyse all issues at hand and reach a unambiguous negotiated agreement. At Oak Spring University, we provide comprehensive negotiation strategies that have proven their worth both in the academic sphere and corporate world.


BATNA in Negotiation Strategy


Three questions every negotiator should ask before entering into a negotiation process-

What’s my BATNA (Best Alternative To a Negotiated Agreement) – my walkaway option if the deal fails?

What are my most important interests, in ranked order?

What is the other side’s BATNA, and what are his interests?



12 Hrs

$59.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now

24 Hrs

$49.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now

48 Hrs

$39.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now




Case Description of Sanlu's Melamine-Tainted Milk Crisis in China Case Study


On 12 September 2008, Sanlu Group, the biggest producer of milk powder in China, rocked the country when it admitted that its infant formula had been contaminated with the toxic chemical melamine. China's national inspection agency extended its investigation to other dairy manufacturers across the nation. Shockingly, products of 21 other dairies, including some famous Chinese brands, also tested positive for melamine. Due to consumption of melamine-laced milk products, more than 56,000 infants and young children had become sick and four babies had died from kidney failure by the end of September. The melamine scare also resulted in many countries recalling and banning goods using milk products from China. When Sanlu became the key culprit in the milk crisis after its infant formula was revealed to contain as much as four times more melamine than other tainted brands, the company apologized to the public. Sanlu also explained that its unscrupulous raw-milk dealers had illegally added melamine to milk. However, it failed to explain its delay in alerting the public when it first received customer complaints in late 2007. Instead, Sanlu had tried to cover up the news until being prompted by its New Zealand partner, Fonterra, which later alerted the New Zealand government. As a result of the milk crisis, the local government of Shijiazhuang, where Sanlu was headquartered, was accused of holding back the news from the central government. Fonterra wrote off all its investment in Sanlu, and Sanlu finally declared bankruptcy on 24 December 2008. The Sanlu incident has spotlighted the inadequacy of China's entire dairy supply chain and has forced the government and the industry to make a collective effort to restore consumer confidence in Chinese dairy products.


Case Authors : Jiangyong Lu, Zhigang Tao, Claudia H. L. Woo

Topic : Global Business

Related Areas : Ethics, Government, Marketing, Social enterprise, Supply chain




Seven Elemental Tools of Negotiation that can be used in Sanlu's Melamine-Tainted Milk Crisis in China solution


1. Satisfies everyone’s core interests (yours and theirs)


By interests, we do not mean the preconceived demands or positions that you or the other party may have, but rather the underlying needs, aims, fears, and concerns that shape what you want. Negotiation is more than getting what you want. It is not winning at all cost. Number of times Win-Win is better option that outright winning or getting what you want.





2. Is the best of many options

Options are the solutions you generate that could meet your and your counterpart’s interests . Often people come to negotiations with very fixed ideas and things they want to achieve. This strategy leaves unexplored options which might be even better than the one that one party wanted to achieve. So always try to provide as many options as possible during the negotiation process. The best outcome should be out of many options rather than few options.


3. Meets legitimate, fair standards

When soft bargainers meet hard bargainers there is always the danger of soft bargainers ceding more than what is necessary. To avoid this scenario you should always focus on legitimate standards or expectations. Standards are often external and objective measures to assess the fairness such as rules and regulations, financial values & resources , market prices etc. If the negotiated agreement is going beyond the industry norms or established standards of fairness then it is prudent to get out of the negotiation.


4. Is better than your alternatives or BATNA

Every negotiators going into the negotiations should always work out the “what if” scenario. The negotiating parties in the “Sanlu's Melamine-Tainted Milk Crisis in China” has three to four plausible scenarios. The negotiating protagonist needs to have clear idea of – what will happen if the negotiations fail. To put it in the negotiating literature – BATNA - Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement. If the negotiated agreement is not better than BATNA then there is no point in accepting the negotiated solution.


5. Is comprised of clear, realistic commitments

One of the biggest problems in implementing the negotiated agreements in corporate world is – the ambiguity in the negotiated agreement. Sometimes the negotiated agreements are not realistic or various parties interpret the outcomes based on their understanding of the situation. It is critical to do negotiations as water tight as possible so that there is less scope for ambiguity.


6. Is the result of effective communication?

Many negotiators make the mistake of focusing only on the substance of the negotiation (interests, options, standards, and so on). How you communicate about that substance, however, can make all the difference. The language you use and the way that you build understanding, jointly solve problems, and together determine the process of the negotiation with your counterpart make your negotiation more efficient, yield clear agreements that each party understands, and help you build better relationships.


7. Managing relationship with counterparty

Another critical factor in the success of your negotiation is how you manage your relationship with your counterpart. According to “Jiangyong Lu, Zhigang Tao, Claudia H. L. Woo”, the protagonist may want to establish a new connection or repair a damaged one; in any case, you want to build a strong working relationship built on mutual respect, well-established trust, and a side-by-side problem- solving approach.




Different types of negotiators – what is your style of negotiation

According to Harvard Business Review , there are three types of negotiators – Hard Bargainers, Soft Bargainers, and Principled Bargainers.

Hard Bargainers – These people see negotiations as an activity that they need to win. They are less focused less on the real objectives of the negotiations but more on winning. In the “Sanlu's Melamine-Tainted Milk Crisis in China ”, do you think a hard bargaining strategy will deliver desired results? Hard bargainers are easy to negotiate with as they often have a very predictable strategy

Soft Bargainers – These people are focused on relationship rather than hard outcomes of the negotiations. It doesn’t mean they are pushovers. These negotiators often scribe to long term relationship rather than immediate bargain.

Principled Bargainers – As explained in the seven elemental tools of negotiations above, these negotiators are more concern about the standards and norms of fairness. They often have inclusive approach to negotiations and like to work on numerous solutions that can improve the BATNA of both parties.

Open lines of communication between parties in the case study “Sanlu's Melamine-Tainted Milk Crisis in China” can make for an effective negotiation strategy and will make it easier to negotiate with this party the next time as well.





NPV Analysis of Sanlu's Melamine-Tainted Milk Crisis in China



References & Further Readings

Jiangyong Lu, Zhigang Tao, Claudia H. L. Woo (2018), "Sanlu's Melamine-Tainted Milk Crisis in China Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Nam Hwa Construction SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Dover SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Misc. Fabricated Products


AMAG SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Gabay Rental SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Ziyuanyuan SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Rental & Leasing


MeguREIT Israel SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations


Hanwei Energy Services Corp. SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction - Raw Materials


MBL Infrastructures Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


China Ting SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Apparel/Accessories


Energy Edge Technolo SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services