Introduction to Negotiation Strategy
At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Negotiation Strategy and other business case study solution. Air Deccan (A): "Simplifying" Air Travel in India case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Benoit Leleux, Isabelle Pigeaux. The Air Deccan (A): "Simplifying" Air Travel in India (referred as “Gopinath Capt” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Innovation & Entrepreneurship. It also touches upon business topics such as - negotiation strategy, negotiation framework, .
Negotiation strategy solution for case study Air Deccan (A): "Simplifying" Air Travel in India ” provides a comprehensive framework to analyse all issues at hand and reach a unambiguous negotiated agreement. At Oak Spring University, we provide comprehensive negotiation strategies that have proven their worth both in the academic sphere and corporate world.
What’s my BATNA (Best Alternative To a Negotiated Agreement) – my walkaway option if the deal fails?
What are my most important interests, in ranked order?
What is the other side’s BATNA, and what are his interests?
Captain Gorur Ramaswamy Gopinath started his journey with a dream - a dream inspired by one simple statement: "I want every Indian to fly at least once in their lifetime." With a population in excess of 1 billion people, India certainly offered a vast reservoir of future air travelers. In 2002, when Capt. Gopinath first broached the idea of starting a low-cost airline to serve India's travel needs, no one took him seriously. Bankers refused to fund him, aircraft manufacturers ignored him and aviation industry observers swore that India was not ready. However, he was convinced that India's burgeoning middle class, already buying color TVs and cell phones, could be converted to air travel. In 2003 he launched the first low-cost airline company in India with a leased 48-seater ATR aircraft and $10 million from investors. By 2007, Capt. Gopinath was close to realizing his dream. Air Deccan, with a market share of 21.6%, was India's fastest-growing low-cost carrier and the second-largest airline in the country. It ran the most extensive network in India, covering 61 airports, flew some 306 scheduled flights a day and operated a brand new fleet of 14 Airbus A320 and 22 ATR Turboprops. Visionary and always optimistic, Capt. Gopinath had brought about a total revolution to the highly regulated Indian skies. But every revolution carries the seeds of its own demise. Competition was increasing rapidly now that the model had been validated, and the Indian airport infrastructure was on the verge of a massive breakdown. New business models had to be devised to remain ahead of the curve. The new logo for the company enigmatically offered a glimpse of what Capt. Gopinath had in mind: S I M P L I F L Y ... Learning objectives: Learn about new business models, innovations, growth management, low cost carrier strategies, Indian issues.
By interests, we do not mean the preconceived demands or positions that you or the other party may have, but rather the underlying needs, aims, fears, and concerns that shape what you want. Negotiation is more than getting what you want. It is not winning at all cost. Number of times Win-Win is better option that outright winning or getting what you want.
Options are the solutions you generate that could meet your and your counterpart’s interests . Often people come to negotiations with very fixed ideas and things they want to achieve. This strategy leaves unexplored options which might be even better than the one that one party wanted to achieve. So always try to provide as many options as possible during the negotiation process. The best outcome should be out of many options rather than few options.
When soft bargainers meet hard bargainers there is always the danger of soft bargainers ceding more than what is necessary. To avoid this scenario you should always focus on legitimate standards or expectations. Standards are often external and objective measures to assess the fairness such as rules and regulations, financial values & resources , market prices etc. If the negotiated agreement is going beyond the industry norms or established standards of fairness then it is prudent to get out of the negotiation.
Every negotiators going into the negotiations should always work out the “what if” scenario. The negotiating parties in the “Air Deccan (A): "Simplifying" Air Travel in India” has three to four plausible scenarios. The negotiating protagonist needs to have clear idea of – what will happen if the negotiations fail. To put it in the negotiating literature – BATNA - Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement. If the negotiated agreement is not better than BATNA then there is no point in accepting the negotiated solution.
One of the biggest problems in implementing the negotiated agreements in corporate world is – the ambiguity in the negotiated agreement. Sometimes the negotiated agreements are not realistic or various parties interpret the outcomes based on their understanding of the situation. It is critical to do negotiations as water tight as possible so that there is less scope for ambiguity.
Many negotiators make the mistake of focusing only on the substance of the negotiation (interests, options, standards, and so on). How you communicate about that substance, however, can make all the difference. The language you use and the way that you build understanding, jointly solve problems, and together determine the process of the negotiation with your counterpart make your negotiation more efficient, yield clear agreements that each party understands, and help you build better relationships.
Another critical factor in the success of your negotiation is how you manage your relationship with your counterpart. According to “Benoit Leleux, Isabelle Pigeaux”, the protagonist may want to establish a new connection or repair a damaged one; in any case, you want to build a strong working relationship built on mutual respect, well-established trust, and a side-by-side problem- solving approach.
According to
Harvard Business Review
, there are three types of negotiators – Hard Bargainers, Soft Bargainers, and Principled Bargainers.
Hard Bargainers – These people see negotiations as an activity that they need to win. They are less focused less on the real objectives of the negotiations but more on winning. In the “Air Deccan (A): "Simplifying" Air Travel in India ”, do you think a hard bargaining strategy will deliver desired results? Hard bargainers are easy to negotiate with as they often have a very
predictable strategy
Soft Bargainers – These people are focused on relationship rather than hard outcomes of the negotiations. It doesn’t mean they are pushovers. These negotiators often scribe to long term relationship rather than immediate bargain.
Principled Bargainers – As explained in the seven elemental tools of negotiations above, these negotiators are more concern about the standards and norms of fairness. They often have inclusive approach to negotiations and like to work on numerous solutions that can improve the BATNA of both parties.
Open lines of communication between parties in the case study “Air Deccan (A): "Simplifying" Air Travel in India” can make for an effective negotiation strategy and will make it easier to negotiate with this party the next time as well.
Benoit Leleux, Isabelle Pigeaux (2018), "Air Deccan (A): "Simplifying" Air Travel in India Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.
Feel free to connect with us if you need business research.
You can download Excel Template of Case Study Solution & Analysis of Air Deccan (A): "Simplifying" Air Travel in India
Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Personal & Household Prods.
Financial , Investment Services
Financial , Misc. Financial Services
Financial , Regional Banks
Services , Advertising
Technology , Software & Programming
Financial , Regional Banks
Consumer Cyclical , Appliance & Tool
Financial , Consumer Financial Services
Technology , Software & Programming
Energy , Coal
