×




Social Entrepreneurship and Sustainable Farming in Indonesia Negotiation Strategy / MBA Resources

Introduction to Negotiation Strategy

Negotiation Strategy solution for Social Entrepreneurship and Sustainable Farming in Indonesia case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Negotiation Strategy and other business case study solution. Social Entrepreneurship and Sustainable Farming in Indonesia case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Ilan Alon, Eve Misati. The Social Entrepreneurship and Sustainable Farming in Indonesia (referred as “Carmi Bali” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Innovation & Entrepreneurship. It also touches upon business topics such as - negotiation strategy, negotiation framework, Marketing, Operations management, Product development, Strategy.

Negotiation strategy solution for case study Social Entrepreneurship and Sustainable Farming in Indonesia ” provides a comprehensive framework to analyse all issues at hand and reach a unambiguous negotiated agreement. At Oak Spring University, we provide comprehensive negotiation strategies that have proven their worth both in the academic sphere and corporate world.


BATNA in Negotiation Strategy


Three questions every negotiator should ask before entering into a negotiation process-

What’s my BATNA (Best Alternative To a Negotiated Agreement) – my walkaway option if the deal fails?

What are my most important interests, in ranked order?

What is the other side’s BATNA, and what are his interests?



12 Hrs

$59.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now

24 Hrs

$49.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now

48 Hrs

$39.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now




Case Description of Social Entrepreneurship and Sustainable Farming in Indonesia Case Study


Oded Carmi was a social entrepreneur striving for a "green Bali." He started Sari Organik as a model farm intended to grow organically with market demands and to benefit the local community while serving as an educational center for small scale farmers in the region. Thirteen years later, the idea was not as well embraced as he had hoped. The case provides information on social entrepreneurship, providing a background on Carmi, the environment in Ubud, Bali, and Indonesia at large, and discusses some of the challenges the entrepreneur was facing as the founder and owner of Sari Organik farm and the restaurant "Warung Bodag Maliah" (overflowing basket). His main challenge was to replicate and sustain his organic rice farming model across Bali and eventually other parts of Indonesia. His initial thoughts involved some options: (a) To utilize the established village system and its leadership (religious and civil) to re-introduce traditional rice farming culture in Ubud, Bali and eventually Indonesia. (b) To introduce a new model such as micro-franchising through which he (the micro-franchiser) would recruit a number of local farmers (micro-franchisees) and provide them with the resources to grow rice organically, (c) To go into a joint venture with the few existing organic rice farmers in the region. (d) To expand his business as a sole proprietor, i.e. buy more land and increase organic rice production - this was his least favorite option since it would go against his mission of involving the community. The case may be a good starting point for discussion on the impact of modernization on a traditional society and the role of business in society. Carmi, a native of Israel, tried to revive traditional farming techniques that were more sustainable and healthy. Carmi realized he had to come up with a strategy soon, and he was open to other viable options for replication and sustenance.


Case Authors : Ilan Alon, Eve Misati

Topic : Innovation & Entrepreneurship

Related Areas : Marketing, Operations management, Product development, Strategy




Seven Elemental Tools of Negotiation that can be used in Social Entrepreneurship and Sustainable Farming in Indonesia solution


1. Satisfies everyone’s core interests (yours and theirs)


By interests, we do not mean the preconceived demands or positions that you or the other party may have, but rather the underlying needs, aims, fears, and concerns that shape what you want. Negotiation is more than getting what you want. It is not winning at all cost. Number of times Win-Win is better option that outright winning or getting what you want.





2. Is the best of many options

Options are the solutions you generate that could meet your and your counterpart’s interests . Often people come to negotiations with very fixed ideas and things they want to achieve. This strategy leaves unexplored options which might be even better than the one that one party wanted to achieve. So always try to provide as many options as possible during the negotiation process. The best outcome should be out of many options rather than few options.


3. Meets legitimate, fair standards

When soft bargainers meet hard bargainers there is always the danger of soft bargainers ceding more than what is necessary. To avoid this scenario you should always focus on legitimate standards or expectations. Standards are often external and objective measures to assess the fairness such as rules and regulations, financial values & resources , market prices etc. If the negotiated agreement is going beyond the industry norms or established standards of fairness then it is prudent to get out of the negotiation.


4. Is better than your alternatives or BATNA

Every negotiators going into the negotiations should always work out the “what if” scenario. The negotiating parties in the “Social Entrepreneurship and Sustainable Farming in Indonesia” has three to four plausible scenarios. The negotiating protagonist needs to have clear idea of – what will happen if the negotiations fail. To put it in the negotiating literature – BATNA - Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement. If the negotiated agreement is not better than BATNA then there is no point in accepting the negotiated solution.


5. Is comprised of clear, realistic commitments

One of the biggest problems in implementing the negotiated agreements in corporate world is – the ambiguity in the negotiated agreement. Sometimes the negotiated agreements are not realistic or various parties interpret the outcomes based on their understanding of the situation. It is critical to do negotiations as water tight as possible so that there is less scope for ambiguity.


6. Is the result of effective communication?

Many negotiators make the mistake of focusing only on the substance of the negotiation (interests, options, standards, and so on). How you communicate about that substance, however, can make all the difference. The language you use and the way that you build understanding, jointly solve problems, and together determine the process of the negotiation with your counterpart make your negotiation more efficient, yield clear agreements that each party understands, and help you build better relationships.


7. Managing relationship with counterparty

Another critical factor in the success of your negotiation is how you manage your relationship with your counterpart. According to “Ilan Alon, Eve Misati”, the protagonist may want to establish a new connection or repair a damaged one; in any case, you want to build a strong working relationship built on mutual respect, well-established trust, and a side-by-side problem- solving approach.




Different types of negotiators – what is your style of negotiation

According to Harvard Business Review , there are three types of negotiators – Hard Bargainers, Soft Bargainers, and Principled Bargainers.

Hard Bargainers – These people see negotiations as an activity that they need to win. They are less focused less on the real objectives of the negotiations but more on winning. In the “Social Entrepreneurship and Sustainable Farming in Indonesia ”, do you think a hard bargaining strategy will deliver desired results? Hard bargainers are easy to negotiate with as they often have a very predictable strategy

Soft Bargainers – These people are focused on relationship rather than hard outcomes of the negotiations. It doesn’t mean they are pushovers. These negotiators often scribe to long term relationship rather than immediate bargain.

Principled Bargainers – As explained in the seven elemental tools of negotiations above, these negotiators are more concern about the standards and norms of fairness. They often have inclusive approach to negotiations and like to work on numerous solutions that can improve the BATNA of both parties.

Open lines of communication between parties in the case study “Social Entrepreneurship and Sustainable Farming in Indonesia” can make for an effective negotiation strategy and will make it easier to negotiate with this party the next time as well.





NPV Analysis of Social Entrepreneurship and Sustainable Farming in Indonesia



References & Further Readings

Ilan Alon, Eve Misati (2018), "Social Entrepreneurship and Sustainable Farming in Indonesia Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Angling Direct SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Services


Aberdeen Frontier Markets SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


Ferrovial SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Crosswood SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations


Global Masters Closed SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


KBC SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , S&Ls/Savings Banks


OceanaGold DRC SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Gold & Silver