×




Li Ka-Shing and the Growth of Cheung Kong Negotiation Strategy / MBA Resources

Introduction to Negotiation Strategy

Negotiation Strategy solution for Li Ka-Shing and the Growth of Cheung Kong case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Negotiation Strategy and other business case study solution. Li Ka-Shing and the Growth of Cheung Kong case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Nitin Nohria, Anthony J. Mayo, Mark Benson. The Li Ka-Shing and the Growth of Cheung Kong (referred as “Li Taipan” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - negotiation strategy, negotiation framework, Decision making, Financial management, Government, International business, Leadership, Market research, Mergers & acquisitions.

Negotiation strategy solution for case study Li Ka-Shing and the Growth of Cheung Kong ” provides a comprehensive framework to analyse all issues at hand and reach a unambiguous negotiated agreement. At Oak Spring University, we provide comprehensive negotiation strategies that have proven their worth both in the academic sphere and corporate world.


BATNA in Negotiation Strategy


Three questions every negotiator should ask before entering into a negotiation process-

What’s my BATNA (Best Alternative To a Negotiated Agreement) – my walkaway option if the deal fails?

What are my most important interests, in ranked order?

What is the other side’s BATNA, and what are his interests?



12 Hrs

$59.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now

24 Hrs

$49.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now

48 Hrs

$39.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now




Case Description of Li Ka-Shing and the Growth of Cheung Kong Case Study


Events in the history of Cheung Kong's growth reveal how Li Ka-Shing applied his skills as a "first-class noticer" to complex political and socioeconomic environments. While Li's determination to succeed is legendary, so are his skills in reading and responding to the policies and norms of the People's Republic of China, British colonial Hong Kong, and the post-World War II international system. Since Li became the taipan of Hutchison Whampoa in the late 1970s, he has adjusted his ownership shares in a vast portfolio of businesses-including ports, energy, real estate, retail, telecommunications, and new media. Illustrates how Li applied his business acumen and his ability as a first-class noticer to decisions about raising or lowering his stake in these businesses, and whether to acquire new ones. After starting Cheung Kong Inc. in 1950, at age 21, Li built upon his knowledge and contacts in the plastics industry to become Hong Kong's King of Plastic Flowers. In the 1960s, amid political turmoil and labor unrest on both the mainland and in colonial Hong Kong, Li purchased rights to properties on Hong Kong island that were selling at distressed rates. Li's successes in industry and real estate continued, and he cultivated contacts and built a strong reputation that set the stage for his purchase of the hong Hutchinson Whampoa, thereby becoming the first Chinese taipan. As taipan, Li reorganized and reallocated his various financial holdings in the 1980s and 1990s as conditions were in flux due to the Westernization of China after Deng Xiaoping succeeded Mao Zedong, and amid concerns about the transfer of Hong Kong from Britain back to China in 1997.


Case Authors : Nitin Nohria, Anthony J. Mayo, Mark Benson

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas : Decision making, Financial management, Government, International business, Leadership, Market research, Mergers & acquisitions




Seven Elemental Tools of Negotiation that can be used in Li Ka-Shing and the Growth of Cheung Kong solution


1. Satisfies everyone’s core interests (yours and theirs)


By interests, we do not mean the preconceived demands or positions that you or the other party may have, but rather the underlying needs, aims, fears, and concerns that shape what you want. Negotiation is more than getting what you want. It is not winning at all cost. Number of times Win-Win is better option that outright winning or getting what you want.





2. Is the best of many options

Options are the solutions you generate that could meet your and your counterpart’s interests . Often people come to negotiations with very fixed ideas and things they want to achieve. This strategy leaves unexplored options which might be even better than the one that one party wanted to achieve. So always try to provide as many options as possible during the negotiation process. The best outcome should be out of many options rather than few options.


3. Meets legitimate, fair standards

When soft bargainers meet hard bargainers there is always the danger of soft bargainers ceding more than what is necessary. To avoid this scenario you should always focus on legitimate standards or expectations. Standards are often external and objective measures to assess the fairness such as rules and regulations, financial values & resources , market prices etc. If the negotiated agreement is going beyond the industry norms or established standards of fairness then it is prudent to get out of the negotiation.


4. Is better than your alternatives or BATNA

Every negotiators going into the negotiations should always work out the “what if” scenario. The negotiating parties in the “Li Ka-Shing and the Growth of Cheung Kong” has three to four plausible scenarios. The negotiating protagonist needs to have clear idea of – what will happen if the negotiations fail. To put it in the negotiating literature – BATNA - Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement. If the negotiated agreement is not better than BATNA then there is no point in accepting the negotiated solution.


5. Is comprised of clear, realistic commitments

One of the biggest problems in implementing the negotiated agreements in corporate world is – the ambiguity in the negotiated agreement. Sometimes the negotiated agreements are not realistic or various parties interpret the outcomes based on their understanding of the situation. It is critical to do negotiations as water tight as possible so that there is less scope for ambiguity.


6. Is the result of effective communication?

Many negotiators make the mistake of focusing only on the substance of the negotiation (interests, options, standards, and so on). How you communicate about that substance, however, can make all the difference. The language you use and the way that you build understanding, jointly solve problems, and together determine the process of the negotiation with your counterpart make your negotiation more efficient, yield clear agreements that each party understands, and help you build better relationships.


7. Managing relationship with counterparty

Another critical factor in the success of your negotiation is how you manage your relationship with your counterpart. According to “Nitin Nohria, Anthony J. Mayo, Mark Benson”, the protagonist may want to establish a new connection or repair a damaged one; in any case, you want to build a strong working relationship built on mutual respect, well-established trust, and a side-by-side problem- solving approach.




Different types of negotiators – what is your style of negotiation

According to Harvard Business Review , there are three types of negotiators – Hard Bargainers, Soft Bargainers, and Principled Bargainers.

Hard Bargainers – These people see negotiations as an activity that they need to win. They are less focused less on the real objectives of the negotiations but more on winning. In the “Li Ka-Shing and the Growth of Cheung Kong ”, do you think a hard bargaining strategy will deliver desired results? Hard bargainers are easy to negotiate with as they often have a very predictable strategy

Soft Bargainers – These people are focused on relationship rather than hard outcomes of the negotiations. It doesn’t mean they are pushovers. These negotiators often scribe to long term relationship rather than immediate bargain.

Principled Bargainers – As explained in the seven elemental tools of negotiations above, these negotiators are more concern about the standards and norms of fairness. They often have inclusive approach to negotiations and like to work on numerous solutions that can improve the BATNA of both parties.

Open lines of communication between parties in the case study “Li Ka-Shing and the Growth of Cheung Kong” can make for an effective negotiation strategy and will make it easier to negotiate with this party the next time as well.





NPV Analysis of Li Ka-Shing and the Growth of Cheung Kong



References & Further Readings

Nitin Nohria, Anthony J. Mayo, Mark Benson (2018), "Li Ka-Shing and the Growth of Cheung Kong Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Yabao Pharm SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Maeda Road Construction SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


GlaxoSmithKline SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Mondo TV SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Motion Pictures


Power Finance SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Consumer Financial Services


Apar Industries Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


China Great Wall SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Investment Services


Niigata Kotsu SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Transportation , Misc. Transportation


LWP Tech SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil Well Services & Equipment


Amyris SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil & Gas Operations


Erie Indemnity SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Insurance (Prop. & Casualty)


Rubius Therapeutics SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs