×




Reading Global Clients' Signals Negotiation Strategy / MBA Resources

Introduction to Negotiation Strategy

Negotiation Strategy solution for Reading Global Clients' Signals case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Negotiation Strategy and other business case study solution. Reading Global Clients' Signals case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Peter Gloor, Gianni Giacomelli. The Reading Global Clients' Signals (referred as “Email Nps” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - negotiation strategy , negotiation framework, .

Negotiation strategy solution for case study Reading Global Clients' Signals ” provides a comprehensive framework to analyse all issues at hand and reach a unambiguous negotiated agreement. At Oak Spring University, we provide comprehensive negotiation strategies that have proven their worth both in the academic sphere and corporate world.


BATNA in Negotiation Strategy


Three questions every negotiator should ask before entering into a negotiation process-

What’s my BATNA (Best Alternative To a Negotiated Agreement) – my walkaway option if the deal fails?

What are my most important interests, in ranked order?

What is the other side’s BATNA, and what are his interests?



12 Hrs

$59.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now

24 Hrs

$49.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now

48 Hrs

$39.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now




Case Description of Reading Global Clients' Signals Case Study


This is an MIT Sloan Management Review article. Managing employees who work together globally is an ongoing challenge for executives of large organizations. The ability to quickly detect changes in the health of relationships with clients can unlock significant value. Many companies monitor customer satisfaction through customer satisfaction surveys, such as the Net Promoter Score (NPS) pioneered by Bain & Co. However, such methods are limited in their ability to provide frequent, detailed and cost-effective evaluations.The way people interact with each other and what they say offer an important window into how they feel about each other. However, the content of what is said is often less significant than how it is said and the accompanying body language. Although face-to-face meetings between providers and customers may offer the clearest and most comprehensive way for managers to gauge customer satisfaction, such information is not generally available in high-volume, globalized collaborations. The authors have developed an assessment method for analyzing email communication patterns between customers and vendors in geographically distributed environments where face-to-face meetings are impractical or impossible. In conducting the research, the authors analyzed the email interactions of 32 service delivery organizations -all part of Genpact, a large global services provider. After notifying the various parties involved and obtaining permissions, the authors retrieved the communications between account managers and their customers and constructed the social network. The authors collected the email boxes of two to three account executives per customer studied and compared the network structure of the communications to the customer's NPS, which was the primary customer satisfaction metric Genpact had been using. The authors also collected the email headers from incoming and outgoing emails for the account executives over a period of eight months. The researchers compared the structure of the resulting communication network with the NPS scores. The authors acknowledge that the method is specifically based on email analysis, and thus it is poorly suited to work contexts where email is not widely employed. In the future, they suggest that it might be possible to adapt the methodology to other electronic media, such as instant messaging services and voice-over-IP telephony.


Case Authors : Peter Gloor, Gianni Giacomelli

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas :




Seven Elemental Tools of Negotiation that can be used in Reading Global Clients' Signals solution


1. Satisfies everyone’s core interests (yours and theirs)


By interests, we do not mean the preconceived demands or positions that you or the other party may have, but rather the underlying needs, aims, fears, and concerns that shape what you want. Negotiation is more than getting what you want. It is not winning at all cost. Number of times Win-Win is better option that outright winning or getting what you want.





2. Is the best of many options

Options are the solutions you generate that could meet your and your counterpart’s interests . Often people come to negotiations with very fixed ideas and things they want to achieve. This strategy leaves unexplored options which might be even better than the one that one party wanted to achieve. So always try to provide as many options as possible during the negotiation process . The best outcome should be out of many options rather than few options.


3. Meets legitimate, fair standards

When soft bargainers meet hard bargainers there is always the danger of soft bargainers ceding more than what is necessary. To avoid this scenario you should always focus on legitimate standards or expectations, clearly understanding the arbitrage . Standards are often external and objective measures to assess the fairness such as rules and regulations, financial values & resources , market prices etc. If the negotiated agreement is going beyond the industry norms or established standards of fairness then it is prudent to get out of the negotiation.


4. Is better than your alternatives or BATNA

Every negotiators going into the negotiations should always work out the “what if” scenario. The negotiating parties in the “Reading Global Clients' Signals” has three to four plausible scenarios. The negotiating protagonist needs to have clear idea of – what will happen if the negotiations fail. To put it in the negotiating literature – BATNA - Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement. If the negotiated agreement is not better than BATNA (Negotiations options), then there is no point in accepting the negotiated solution.


5. Is comprised of clear, realistic commitments

One of the biggest problems in implementing the negotiated agreements in corporate world is – the ambiguity in the negotiated agreement. Sometimes the negotiated agreements are not realistic or various parties interpret the outcomes based on their understanding of the situation. It is critical to do negotiations as water tight as possible so that there is less scope for ambiguity.


6. Is the result of effective communication?

Many negotiators make the mistake of focusing only on the substance of the negotiation (interests, options, standards, and so on). How you communicate about that substance, however, can make all the difference. The language you use and the way that you build understanding, jointly solve problems, and together determine the process of the negotiation with your counterpart make your negotiation more efficient, yield clear agreements that each party understands, and help you build better relationships.


7. Managing relationship with counterparty

Another critical factor in the success of your negotiation is how you manage your relationship with your counterpart and other people doing the mediation. According to “Peter Gloor, Gianni Giacomelli”, the protagonist may want to establish a new connection or repair a damaged one; in any case, you want to build a strong working relationship built on mutual respect, well-established trust, and a side-by-side problem- solving approach.




Different types of negotiators – what is your style of negotiation

According to Harvard Business Review , there are three types of negotiators – Hard Bargainers, Soft Bargainers, and Principled Bargainers.

Hard Bargainers – These people see negotiations as an activity that they need to win. They are less focused less on the real objectives of the negotiations but more on winning. In the “Reading Global Clients' Signals ”, do you think a hard bargaining strategy will deliver desired results? Hard bargainers are easy to negotiate with as they often have a very predictable strategy

Soft Bargainers – These people are focused on relationship rather than hard outcomes of the negotiations. It doesn’t mean they are pushovers. These negotiators often scribe to long term relationship rather than immediate bargain.

Principled Bargainers – As explained in the seven elemental tools of negotiations above, these negotiators are more concern about the standards and norms of fairness. They often have inclusive approach to negotiations and like to work on numerous solutions that can improve the BATNA of both parties.

Open lines of communication between parties in the case study “Reading Global Clients' Signals” can make for an effective negotiation strategy and will make it easier to negotiate with this party the next time as well.





NPV Analysis of Reading Global Clients' Signals



References & Further Readings

Peter Gloor, Gianni Giacomelli (2018), "Reading Global Clients' Signals Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


E-House China SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations


Metabiomed SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Medical Equipment & Supplies


S&W Seed SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Crops


Fukui Computer Holdings SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Aberdeen Frontier Markets SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


Imagineer SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Services


Qinghaihuading SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods