×




Managing Millennials: Embracing Generational Differences Negotiation Strategy / MBA Resources

Introduction to Negotiation Strategy

Negotiation Strategy solution for Managing Millennials: Embracing Generational Differences case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Negotiation Strategy and other business case study solution. Managing Millennials: Embracing Generational Differences case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Jeanine S. Stewart, Elizabeth Goad Oliver, Karen S. Cravens, Shigehiro Oishi. The Managing Millennials: Embracing Generational Differences (referred as “Workplace Generational” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - negotiation strategy, negotiation framework, Human resource management, Labor, Organizational culture.

Negotiation strategy solution for case study Managing Millennials: Embracing Generational Differences ” provides a comprehensive framework to analyse all issues at hand and reach a unambiguous negotiated agreement. At Oak Spring University, we provide comprehensive negotiation strategies that have proven their worth both in the academic sphere and corporate world.


BATNA in Negotiation Strategy


Three questions every negotiator should ask before entering into a negotiation process-

What’s my BATNA (Best Alternative To a Negotiated Agreement) – my walkaway option if the deal fails?

What are my most important interests, in ranked order?

What is the other side’s BATNA, and what are his interests?



12 Hrs

$59.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now

24 Hrs

$49.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now

48 Hrs

$39.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now




Case Description of Managing Millennials: Embracing Generational Differences Case Study


The topic of the Millennial Generation in the workplace drives much business conversation, as members of this generation form a growing percentage of the employee base. Both popular media and scholarly literature have painted the population of younger workers in an uncharitable light. The goals of this article are to contextualize the results of a large, empirical study in a more charitable light and to suggest that embracing generational differences provides an opportunity as well as a challenge. This article examines traits of the different generations, in addition to the relationship between organizational commitment and workplace culture. We present findings that show millennials (also known as Generation Y, or Gen Y) as the only generational group that does not conceptually link organizational commitment with workplace culture. This group also thinks of work differently than members of the other generations, yet these differences can be understood through a managerial lens focusing on qualities such as duty, drive, and reward. We argue that by changing performance evaluation metrics to encompass a greater variety of measures, managers can provide a more detailed picture of the employee's work, and thus impact the worker's sense of duty. Additionally, by providing a more transparent workplace, employers can increase the employee's drive and clearly demonstrate the reward that workers will receive. Finally, changes that help newer employees adjust to the workplace can also allow the organization to operate more efficiently, benefiting employees of all generations.


Case Authors : Jeanine S. Stewart, Elizabeth Goad Oliver, Karen S. Cravens, Shigehiro Oishi

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas : Human resource management, Labor, Organizational culture




Seven Elemental Tools of Negotiation that can be used in Managing Millennials: Embracing Generational Differences solution


1. Satisfies everyone’s core interests (yours and theirs)


By interests, we do not mean the preconceived demands or positions that you or the other party may have, but rather the underlying needs, aims, fears, and concerns that shape what you want. Negotiation is more than getting what you want. It is not winning at all cost. Number of times Win-Win is better option that outright winning or getting what you want.





2. Is the best of many options

Options are the solutions you generate that could meet your and your counterpart’s interests . Often people come to negotiations with very fixed ideas and things they want to achieve. This strategy leaves unexplored options which might be even better than the one that one party wanted to achieve. So always try to provide as many options as possible during the negotiation process. The best outcome should be out of many options rather than few options.


3. Meets legitimate, fair standards

When soft bargainers meet hard bargainers there is always the danger of soft bargainers ceding more than what is necessary. To avoid this scenario you should always focus on legitimate standards or expectations. Standards are often external and objective measures to assess the fairness such as rules and regulations, financial values & resources , market prices etc. If the negotiated agreement is going beyond the industry norms or established standards of fairness then it is prudent to get out of the negotiation.


4. Is better than your alternatives or BATNA

Every negotiators going into the negotiations should always work out the “what if” scenario. The negotiating parties in the “Managing Millennials: Embracing Generational Differences” has three to four plausible scenarios. The negotiating protagonist needs to have clear idea of – what will happen if the negotiations fail. To put it in the negotiating literature – BATNA - Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement. If the negotiated agreement is not better than BATNA then there is no point in accepting the negotiated solution.


5. Is comprised of clear, realistic commitments

One of the biggest problems in implementing the negotiated agreements in corporate world is – the ambiguity in the negotiated agreement. Sometimes the negotiated agreements are not realistic or various parties interpret the outcomes based on their understanding of the situation. It is critical to do negotiations as water tight as possible so that there is less scope for ambiguity.


6. Is the result of effective communication?

Many negotiators make the mistake of focusing only on the substance of the negotiation (interests, options, standards, and so on). How you communicate about that substance, however, can make all the difference. The language you use and the way that you build understanding, jointly solve problems, and together determine the process of the negotiation with your counterpart make your negotiation more efficient, yield clear agreements that each party understands, and help you build better relationships.


7. Managing relationship with counterparty

Another critical factor in the success of your negotiation is how you manage your relationship with your counterpart. According to “Jeanine S. Stewart, Elizabeth Goad Oliver, Karen S. Cravens, Shigehiro Oishi”, the protagonist may want to establish a new connection or repair a damaged one; in any case, you want to build a strong working relationship built on mutual respect, well-established trust, and a side-by-side problem- solving approach.




Different types of negotiators – what is your style of negotiation

According to Harvard Business Review , there are three types of negotiators – Hard Bargainers, Soft Bargainers, and Principled Bargainers.

Hard Bargainers – These people see negotiations as an activity that they need to win. They are less focused less on the real objectives of the negotiations but more on winning. In the “Managing Millennials: Embracing Generational Differences ”, do you think a hard bargaining strategy will deliver desired results? Hard bargainers are easy to negotiate with as they often have a very predictable strategy

Soft Bargainers – These people are focused on relationship rather than hard outcomes of the negotiations. It doesn’t mean they are pushovers. These negotiators often scribe to long term relationship rather than immediate bargain.

Principled Bargainers – As explained in the seven elemental tools of negotiations above, these negotiators are more concern about the standards and norms of fairness. They often have inclusive approach to negotiations and like to work on numerous solutions that can improve the BATNA of both parties.

Open lines of communication between parties in the case study “Managing Millennials: Embracing Generational Differences” can make for an effective negotiation strategy and will make it easier to negotiate with this party the next time as well.





NPV Analysis of Managing Millennials: Embracing Generational Differences



References & Further Readings

Jeanine S. Stewart, Elizabeth Goad Oliver, Karen S. Cravens, Shigehiro Oishi (2018), "Managing Millennials: Embracing Generational Differences Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Xavis SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


CPFL Energia ADR SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Utilities , Electric Utilities


Alamos Gold SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Gold & Silver


Emova SA SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Retail (Specialty)


Buzzi Unicem RSP SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction - Raw Materials


NJS Co Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Business Services


Neuros SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods


Thong Guan Industries Bhd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Containers & Packaging


A&D Co Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Asia Pacific Wire & Cable SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Communications Equipment