Introduction to Negotiation Strategy
At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Negotiation Strategy and other business case study solution. Rollins College Nonprofit Leadership and Philanthropy Center: The Importance of Networking case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Mary Conway Dato-on, Margaret Linnane. The Rollins College Nonprofit Leadership and Philanthropy Center: The Importance of Networking (referred as “Linnane Pnlc's” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - negotiation strategy , negotiation framework, Leadership, Networking, Strategic planning.
Negotiation strategy solution for case study Rollins College Nonprofit Leadership and Philanthropy Center: The Importance of Networking ” provides a comprehensive framework to analyse all issues at hand and reach a unambiguous negotiated agreement. At Oak Spring University, we provide comprehensive negotiation strategies that have proven their worth both in the academic sphere and corporate world.
What’s my BATNA (Best Alternative To a Negotiated Agreement) – my walkaway option if the deal fails?
What are my most important interests, in ranked order?
What is the other side’s BATNA, and what are his interests?
"Margaret Linnane was distraught and dumbfounded. In addition, she was fuming. She had just arrived home from the funders' meeting where she had been asked questions that came close to challenging the very purpose of her nonprofit organization. She had been unprepared for the very tough questions the funders had asked and she knew that she would need to be much better prepared for the next specially scheduled meeting in one month. She needed answers to the funders' questions and she wondered how to achieve these answers in four short weeks. Linnane and the Rollins College Philanthropy and Nonprofit Leadership Center (PNLC, or the Center) staff put other efforts on hold while they worked intensely to prepare for the upcoming meeting. They gathered all the documents on the PNLC's mission, vision and strategic plan. Brainstorming started. What information did they need to compile to convince the funders that the PNLC's services (such as networking among established chief executive officers (CEOs) and foundation directors, and introducing newcomers to the nonprofit community) contributed to the professionalization of nonprofit leaders and organizations while addressing critical community issues and fulfilling the PNLC's mission - even if such services had not yet generated any revenue? What outcome measures were appropriate for assessing the success of non-income-generating activities such as networking? To start to search for answers to such questions (and others), Linnane decided to review PNLC's performance from the last two years and to build a strategy for 2011/12. Time was of the essence because without the support of funders, Linnane would be hard-pressed to continue offering the now well-accepted networking activities."
By interests, we do not mean the preconceived demands or positions that you or the other party may have, but rather the underlying needs, aims, fears, and concerns that shape what you want. Negotiation is more than getting what you want. It is not winning at all cost. Number of times Win-Win is better option that outright winning or getting what you want.
Options are the solutions you generate that could meet your and your counterpart’s interests . Often people come to negotiations with very fixed ideas and things they want to achieve. This strategy leaves unexplored options which might be even better than the one that one party wanted to achieve. So always try to provide as many options as possible during the negotiation process . The best outcome should be out of many options rather than few options.
When soft bargainers meet hard bargainers there is always the danger of soft bargainers ceding more than what is necessary. To avoid this scenario you should always focus on legitimate standards or expectations, clearly understanding the arbitrage . Standards are often external and objective measures to assess the fairness such as rules and regulations, financial values & resources , market prices etc. If the negotiated agreement is going beyond the industry norms or established standards of fairness then it is prudent to get out of the negotiation.
Every negotiators going into the negotiations should always work out the “what if” scenario. The negotiating parties in the “Rollins College Nonprofit Leadership and Philanthropy Center: The Importance of Networking” has three to four plausible scenarios. The negotiating protagonist needs to have clear idea of – what will happen if the negotiations fail. To put it in the negotiating literature – BATNA - Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement. If the negotiated agreement is not better than BATNA (Negotiations options), then there is no point in accepting the negotiated solution.
One of the biggest problems in implementing the negotiated agreements in corporate world is – the ambiguity in the negotiated agreement. Sometimes the negotiated agreements are not realistic or various parties interpret the outcomes based on their understanding of the situation. It is critical to do negotiations as water tight as possible so that there is less scope for ambiguity.
Many negotiators make the mistake of focusing only on the substance of the negotiation (interests, options, standards, and so on). How you communicate about that substance, however, can make all the difference. The language you use and the way that you build understanding, jointly solve problems, and together determine the process of the negotiation with your counterpart make your negotiation more efficient, yield clear agreements that each party understands, and help you build better relationships.
Another critical factor in the success of your negotiation is how you manage your relationship with your counterpart and other people doing the mediation. According to “Mary Conway Dato-on, Margaret Linnane”, the protagonist may want to establish a new connection or repair a damaged one; in any case, you want to build a strong working relationship built on mutual respect, well-established trust, and a side-by-side problem- solving approach.
According to
Harvard Business Review
, there are three types of negotiators – Hard Bargainers, Soft Bargainers, and Principled Bargainers.
Hard Bargainers – These people see negotiations as an activity that they need to win. They are less focused less on the real objectives of the negotiations but more on winning. In the “Rollins College Nonprofit Leadership and Philanthropy Center: The Importance of Networking ”, do you think a hard bargaining strategy will deliver desired results? Hard bargainers are easy to negotiate with as they often have a very
predictable strategy
Soft Bargainers – These people are focused on relationship rather than hard outcomes of the negotiations. It doesn’t mean they are pushovers. These negotiators often scribe to long term relationship rather than immediate bargain.
Principled Bargainers – As explained in the seven elemental tools of negotiations above, these negotiators are more concern about the standards and norms of fairness. They often have inclusive approach to negotiations and like to work on numerous solutions that can improve the BATNA of both parties.
Open lines of communication between parties in the case study “Rollins College Nonprofit Leadership and Philanthropy Center: The Importance of Networking” can make for an effective negotiation strategy and will make it easier to negotiate with this party the next time as well.
Mary Conway Dato-on, Margaret Linnane (2018), "Rollins College Nonprofit Leadership and Philanthropy Center: The Importance of Networking Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.
Feel free to connect with us if you need business research.
You can download Excel Template of Case Study Solution & Analysis of Rollins College Nonprofit Leadership and Philanthropy Center: The Importance of Networking
Financial , Consumer Financial Services
Healthcare , Healthcare Facilities
Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs
Consumer Cyclical , Recreational Products
Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing
Financial , Insurance (Life)
Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Personal & Household Prods.
Technology , Computer Services
Services , Retail (Grocery)
Basic Materials , Gold & Silver