×




BAVARIA AND THE SWINKELS FAMILY: BREWING A STICKY BRAND Negotiation Strategy / MBA Resources

Introduction to Negotiation Strategy

Negotiation Strategy solution for BAVARIA AND THE SWINKELS FAMILY: BREWING A STICKY BRAND case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Negotiation Strategy and other business case study solution. BAVARIA AND THE SWINKELS FAMILY: BREWING A STICKY BRAND case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Benoit Leleux, Jan Van Der Kaaij. The BAVARIA AND THE SWINKELS FAMILY: BREWING A STICKY BRAND (referred as “Bavaria Guerilla” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - negotiation strategy, negotiation framework, Succession planning.

Negotiation strategy solution for case study BAVARIA AND THE SWINKELS FAMILY: BREWING A STICKY BRAND ” provides a comprehensive framework to analyse all issues at hand and reach a unambiguous negotiated agreement. At Oak Spring University, we provide comprehensive negotiation strategies that have proven their worth both in the academic sphere and corporate world.


BATNA in Negotiation Strategy


Three questions every negotiator should ask before entering into a negotiation process-

What’s my BATNA (Best Alternative To a Negotiated Agreement) – my walkaway option if the deal fails?

What are my most important interests, in ranked order?

What is the other side’s BATNA, and what are his interests?



12 Hrs

$59.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now

24 Hrs

$49.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now

48 Hrs

$39.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now




Case Description of BAVARIA AND THE SWINKELS FAMILY: BREWING A STICKY BRAND Case Study


Peer Swinkels (36) took a moment in 2011 to reflect on the achievements and the challenges that lay ahead for the 330-year-old family brewery. Peer was responsible for the commercial activities of the company. Together with his fellow board members, he was quite aware that his predecessors had left behind a beer company that excelled in manufacturing but lacked the brand traction to really hit the big league. The challenge for the seventh generation was clearly to leverage its exceptional brewing skills to create an equally strong brand using the unique family values and culture nurtured since the company was created back in 1680. Bavaria stood for fierce independence and a high degree of entrepreneurship, mixing legacy with innovation. Despite its long history, Bavaria regarded itself as a fresh young company, as epitomized by its internal motto ("Let's try") and the branding pay-off of the Bavaria brand ("Done!"). In the last few years, Bavaria had made significant progress in (re-)positioning the brand. It had successfully revitalized it in its Dutch home market with a new brand design, and was now rolling it out on a global scale. It launched award-winning innovations such as alcohol-free white beers. Its innovative guerilla marketing activities at the World Soccer Championships in South Africa won applauses and recognition all over the world. Should the company roll out the same aggressive product and marketing tactics in its 120 markets? Would it be possible to pull off a new guerilla marketing campaign around the 2012 European Soccer Championships in Poland and Ukraine? What other channels should it consider to reinforce the brand and match its product innovation prowess? Learning objectives: Guerilla marketing, growth management, family business.


Case Authors : Benoit Leleux, Jan Van Der Kaaij

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas : Succession planning




Seven Elemental Tools of Negotiation that can be used in BAVARIA AND THE SWINKELS FAMILY: BREWING A STICKY BRAND solution


1. Satisfies everyone’s core interests (yours and theirs)


By interests, we do not mean the preconceived demands or positions that you or the other party may have, but rather the underlying needs, aims, fears, and concerns that shape what you want. Negotiation is more than getting what you want. It is not winning at all cost. Number of times Win-Win is better option that outright winning or getting what you want.





2. Is the best of many options

Options are the solutions you generate that could meet your and your counterpart’s interests . Often people come to negotiations with very fixed ideas and things they want to achieve. This strategy leaves unexplored options which might be even better than the one that one party wanted to achieve. So always try to provide as many options as possible during the negotiation process. The best outcome should be out of many options rather than few options.


3. Meets legitimate, fair standards

When soft bargainers meet hard bargainers there is always the danger of soft bargainers ceding more than what is necessary. To avoid this scenario you should always focus on legitimate standards or expectations. Standards are often external and objective measures to assess the fairness such as rules and regulations, financial values & resources , market prices etc. If the negotiated agreement is going beyond the industry norms or established standards of fairness then it is prudent to get out of the negotiation.


4. Is better than your alternatives or BATNA

Every negotiators going into the negotiations should always work out the “what if” scenario. The negotiating parties in the “BAVARIA AND THE SWINKELS FAMILY: BREWING A STICKY BRAND” has three to four plausible scenarios. The negotiating protagonist needs to have clear idea of – what will happen if the negotiations fail. To put it in the negotiating literature – BATNA - Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement. If the negotiated agreement is not better than BATNA then there is no point in accepting the negotiated solution.


5. Is comprised of clear, realistic commitments

One of the biggest problems in implementing the negotiated agreements in corporate world is – the ambiguity in the negotiated agreement. Sometimes the negotiated agreements are not realistic or various parties interpret the outcomes based on their understanding of the situation. It is critical to do negotiations as water tight as possible so that there is less scope for ambiguity.


6. Is the result of effective communication?

Many negotiators make the mistake of focusing only on the substance of the negotiation (interests, options, standards, and so on). How you communicate about that substance, however, can make all the difference. The language you use and the way that you build understanding, jointly solve problems, and together determine the process of the negotiation with your counterpart make your negotiation more efficient, yield clear agreements that each party understands, and help you build better relationships.


7. Managing relationship with counterparty

Another critical factor in the success of your negotiation is how you manage your relationship with your counterpart. According to “Benoit Leleux, Jan Van Der Kaaij”, the protagonist may want to establish a new connection or repair a damaged one; in any case, you want to build a strong working relationship built on mutual respect, well-established trust, and a side-by-side problem- solving approach.




Different types of negotiators – what is your style of negotiation

According to Harvard Business Review , there are three types of negotiators – Hard Bargainers, Soft Bargainers, and Principled Bargainers.

Hard Bargainers – These people see negotiations as an activity that they need to win. They are less focused less on the real objectives of the negotiations but more on winning. In the “BAVARIA AND THE SWINKELS FAMILY: BREWING A STICKY BRAND ”, do you think a hard bargaining strategy will deliver desired results? Hard bargainers are easy to negotiate with as they often have a very predictable strategy

Soft Bargainers – These people are focused on relationship rather than hard outcomes of the negotiations. It doesn’t mean they are pushovers. These negotiators often scribe to long term relationship rather than immediate bargain.

Principled Bargainers – As explained in the seven elemental tools of negotiations above, these negotiators are more concern about the standards and norms of fairness. They often have inclusive approach to negotiations and like to work on numerous solutions that can improve the BATNA of both parties.

Open lines of communication between parties in the case study “BAVARIA AND THE SWINKELS FAMILY: BREWING A STICKY BRAND” can make for an effective negotiation strategy and will make it easier to negotiate with this party the next time as well.





NPV Analysis of BAVARIA AND THE SWINKELS FAMILY: BREWING A STICKY BRAND



References & Further Readings

Benoit Leleux, Jan Van Der Kaaij (2018), "BAVARIA AND THE SWINKELS FAMILY: BREWING A STICKY BRAND Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


eTEC E&C SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


AVIC Aviation Engine SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Aerospace & Defense


Carpenter Tan SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Constr. - Supplies & Fixtures


United Global SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil & Gas Operations


IJM Plantations SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Crops


Orrstown SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Regional Banks


Humanwell Healthcare SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Curtiss-Wright SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Misc. Fabricated Products