×




AirAsia X: Can the Low Cost Model Go Long Haul? Negotiation Strategy / MBA Resources

Introduction to Negotiation Strategy

Negotiation Strategy solution for AirAsia X: Can the Low Cost Model Go Long Haul? case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Negotiation Strategy and other business case study solution. AirAsia X: Can the Low Cost Model Go Long Haul? case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Thomas Lawton, Jonathan P. Doh, Andreas Schotter, Ben Forrey. The AirAsia X: Can the Low Cost Model Go Long Haul? (referred as “Haul Airasia” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - negotiation strategy , negotiation framework, Entrepreneurship, Growth strategy.

Negotiation strategy solution for case study AirAsia X: Can the Low Cost Model Go Long Haul? ” provides a comprehensive framework to analyse all issues at hand and reach a unambiguous negotiated agreement. At Oak Spring University, we provide comprehensive negotiation strategies that have proven their worth both in the academic sphere and corporate world.


BATNA in Negotiation Strategy


Three questions every negotiator should ask before entering into a negotiation process-

What’s my BATNA (Best Alternative To a Negotiated Agreement) – my walkaway option if the deal fails?

What are my most important interests, in ranked order?

What is the other side’s BATNA, and what are his interests?



12 Hrs

$59.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now

24 Hrs

$49.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now

48 Hrs

$39.99
per Page
  • 100% Plagiarism Free
  • On Time Delivery | 27x7
  • PayPal Secure
  • 300 Words / Page
  • Buy Now




Case Description of AirAsia X: Can the Low Cost Model Go Long Haul? Case Study


By 2007, AirAsia had become one of the most successful budget airlines in the world. Having conquered Southeast Asia, and entered China and India, AirAsia was poised to solidify its place as one of the foremost budget airlines and one of the most consistently profitable globally. But company founder Tony Fernandes had bigger plans. From the outset in 2001, Fernandes had intended to offer long haul service, competing against the largest and most established airlines in the world. However, his advisors had urged him to focus on regional, short to medium distance service. With many successes under his belt, Fernandes was once again ready to tackle long haul. Despite persistent claims from industry insiders that low cost long haul flights would never be profitable, Fernandes pushed forward with the expansion. Hiring 36-year-old Azran Osman-Rani as the CEO for the new long haul venture, nicknamed X, was a critical step in this process. X's inaugural flight to Australia took place in November 2007. In early 2010, X received its eleventh aircraft and was flying to 15 destinations on three continents. However, over time the substantial differences between long haul and short haul operating requirements became more apparent. Consequently, the management decided to formally separate X from AirAsia. This separation, and the inherent challenges for X and its recently appointed head of Commercial Operations, Darren Wright included: (1) how best to leverage the extensive network of the regional sister company AirAsia in selecting new and profitable destinations for X, (2) how to increase revenues without raising ticket prices, (3) how best to globally position the airline's brand in non-Asian markets, (4) how to shift his marketing team's mentality away from a start-up mindset, and (5) how to prepare for a global initial public offering within the next 12 months.


Case Authors : Thomas Lawton, Jonathan P. Doh, Andreas Schotter, Ben Forrey

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas : Entrepreneurship, Growth strategy




Seven Elemental Tools of Negotiation that can be used in AirAsia X: Can the Low Cost Model Go Long Haul? solution


1. Satisfies everyone’s core interests (yours and theirs)


By interests, we do not mean the preconceived demands or positions that you or the other party may have, but rather the underlying needs, aims, fears, and concerns that shape what you want. Negotiation is more than getting what you want. It is not winning at all cost. Number of times Win-Win is better option that outright winning or getting what you want.





2. Is the best of many options

Options are the solutions you generate that could meet your and your counterpart’s interests . Often people come to negotiations with very fixed ideas and things they want to achieve. This strategy leaves unexplored options which might be even better than the one that one party wanted to achieve. So always try to provide as many options as possible during the negotiation process . The best outcome should be out of many options rather than few options.


3. Meets legitimate, fair standards

When soft bargainers meet hard bargainers there is always the danger of soft bargainers ceding more than what is necessary. To avoid this scenario you should always focus on legitimate standards or expectations, clearly understanding the arbitrage . Standards are often external and objective measures to assess the fairness such as rules and regulations, financial values & resources , market prices etc. If the negotiated agreement is going beyond the industry norms or established standards of fairness then it is prudent to get out of the negotiation.


4. Is better than your alternatives or BATNA

Every negotiators going into the negotiations should always work out the “what if” scenario. The negotiating parties in the “AirAsia X: Can the Low Cost Model Go Long Haul?” has three to four plausible scenarios. The negotiating protagonist needs to have clear idea of – what will happen if the negotiations fail. To put it in the negotiating literature – BATNA - Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement. If the negotiated agreement is not better than BATNA (Negotiations options), then there is no point in accepting the negotiated solution.


5. Is comprised of clear, realistic commitments

One of the biggest problems in implementing the negotiated agreements in corporate world is – the ambiguity in the negotiated agreement. Sometimes the negotiated agreements are not realistic or various parties interpret the outcomes based on their understanding of the situation. It is critical to do negotiations as water tight as possible so that there is less scope for ambiguity.


6. Is the result of effective communication?

Many negotiators make the mistake of focusing only on the substance of the negotiation (interests, options, standards, and so on). How you communicate about that substance, however, can make all the difference. The language you use and the way that you build understanding, jointly solve problems, and together determine the process of the negotiation with your counterpart make your negotiation more efficient, yield clear agreements that each party understands, and help you build better relationships.


7. Managing relationship with counterparty

Another critical factor in the success of your negotiation is how you manage your relationship with your counterpart and other people doing the mediation. According to “Thomas Lawton, Jonathan P. Doh, Andreas Schotter, Ben Forrey”, the protagonist may want to establish a new connection or repair a damaged one; in any case, you want to build a strong working relationship built on mutual respect, well-established trust, and a side-by-side problem- solving approach.




Different types of negotiators – what is your style of negotiation

According to Harvard Business Review , there are three types of negotiators – Hard Bargainers, Soft Bargainers, and Principled Bargainers.

Hard Bargainers – These people see negotiations as an activity that they need to win. They are less focused less on the real objectives of the negotiations but more on winning. In the “AirAsia X: Can the Low Cost Model Go Long Haul? ”, do you think a hard bargaining strategy will deliver desired results? Hard bargainers are easy to negotiate with as they often have a very predictable strategy

Soft Bargainers – These people are focused on relationship rather than hard outcomes of the negotiations. It doesn’t mean they are pushovers. These negotiators often scribe to long term relationship rather than immediate bargain.

Principled Bargainers – As explained in the seven elemental tools of negotiations above, these negotiators are more concern about the standards and norms of fairness. They often have inclusive approach to negotiations and like to work on numerous solutions that can improve the BATNA of both parties.

Open lines of communication between parties in the case study “AirAsia X: Can the Low Cost Model Go Long Haul?” can make for an effective negotiation strategy and will make it easier to negotiate with this party the next time as well.





NPV Analysis of AirAsia X: Can the Low Cost Model Go Long Haul?



References & Further Readings

Thomas Lawton, Jonathan P. Doh, Andreas Schotter, Ben Forrey (2018), "AirAsia X: Can the Low Cost Model Go Long Haul? Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Arconic Pref SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Metal Mining


Maeda Corp SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Guizhou Wire Rope SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Constr. - Supplies & Fixtures


Maxwell Resource SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil & Gas - Integrated


JVM SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Medical Equipment & Supplies


Aggreko SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Rental & Leasing


Exor SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Manufacturers


S Immo Ag SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations