×




Viterra Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Viterra case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Viterra case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Ray A. Goldberg, Matthew Preble. The Viterra (referred as “Viterra Agribusiness” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Growth strategy, International business, Marketing, Organizational culture, Strategy execution.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Viterra Case Study


As Mayo Schmidt's tenure as CEO of the Canadian-based agribusiness Viterra wound down before its sale to the Swiss-based commodity company Glencore, he reflected on his tenure, which had seen the firm grow from a Canadian-focused agricultural cooperative to an international agribusiness with operations across the globe, including significant operations in Australia. Now he wondered: What would the future hold for agriculture?


Case Authors : Ray A. Goldberg, Matthew Preble

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas : Growth strategy, International business, Marketing, Organizational culture, Strategy execution




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Viterra Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10010419) -10010419 - -
Year 1 3443644 -6566775 3443644 0.9434 3248721
Year 2 3974136 -2592639 7417780 0.89 3536967
Year 3 3960385 1367746 11378165 0.8396 3325216
Year 4 3239572 4607318 14617737 0.7921 2566044
TOTAL 14617737 12676948




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2666529

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Payback Period
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Viterra Agribusiness have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Viterra Agribusiness shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Viterra

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Viterra Agribusiness often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Viterra Agribusiness needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10010419) -10010419 - -
Year 1 3443644 -6566775 3443644 0.8696 2994473
Year 2 3974136 -2592639 7417780 0.7561 3005018
Year 3 3960385 1367746 11378165 0.6575 2604017
Year 4 3239572 4607318 14617737 0.5718 1852236
TOTAL 10455744


The Net NPV after 4 years is 445325

(10455744 - 10010419 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10010419) -10010419 - -
Year 1 3443644 -6566775 3443644 0.8333 2869703
Year 2 3974136 -2592639 7417780 0.6944 2759817
Year 3 3960385 1367746 11378165 0.5787 2291889
Year 4 3239572 4607318 14617737 0.4823 1562294
TOTAL 9483703


The Net NPV after 4 years is -526716

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9483703 - 10010419 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Viterra Agribusiness to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Viterra Agribusiness has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Viterra Agribusiness can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Viterra Agribusiness, then the stock price of the Viterra Agribusiness should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Viterra Agribusiness should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Viterra

References & Further Readings

Ray A. Goldberg, Matthew Preble (2018), "Viterra Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Cavitation Techs Inc SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods


Green Organic Dutchman SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Pinestone Capital SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Consumer Financial Services


Charle SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Apparel/Accessories


Leaguer Stock A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


RWE AG ST SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Utilities , Electric Utilities


KEPCO Eng & Const SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


NSK SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Parts


Seah Holdings SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Iron & Steel


Sz Energy A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Utilities , Electric Utilities