×




The Common Final Exam (A) Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for The Common Final Exam (A) case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. The Common Final Exam (A) case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Iris Berdrow. The The Common Final Exam (A) (referred as “Exam Semester” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Leadership & Managing People. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Decision making, Negotiations.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of The Common Final Exam (A) Case Study


The coordinator of an introductory, required freshman course is responsible for managing the final exam for 25 sections every semester. Approximately 500 students took the exam at the same time on a Saturday morning. The students were notified several times throughout the semester about the date and time of the exam. The rules stated that unless arranged prior to the exam, anyone late or absent on the day of the exam would receive a zero on their exam grade. The (A) case has three scenarios, each requiring a decision.


Case Authors : Iris Berdrow

Topic : Leadership & Managing People

Related Areas : Decision making, Negotiations




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for The Common Final Exam (A) Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10004995) -10004995 - -
Year 1 3457885 -6547110 3457885 0.9434 3262156
Year 2 3973407 -2573703 7431292 0.89 3536318
Year 3 3975346 1401643 11406638 0.8396 3337777
Year 4 3231726 4633369 14638364 0.7921 2559830
TOTAL 14638364 12696081




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2691086

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Net Present Value
3. Profitability Index
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Exam Semester shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Exam Semester have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of The Common Final Exam (A)

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Leadership & Managing People Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Exam Semester often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Exam Semester needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10004995) -10004995 - -
Year 1 3457885 -6547110 3457885 0.8696 3006857
Year 2 3973407 -2573703 7431292 0.7561 3004467
Year 3 3975346 1401643 11406638 0.6575 2613855
Year 4 3231726 4633369 14638364 0.5718 1847750
TOTAL 10472927


The Net NPV after 4 years is 467932

(10472927 - 10004995 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10004995) -10004995 - -
Year 1 3457885 -6547110 3457885 0.8333 2881571
Year 2 3973407 -2573703 7431292 0.6944 2759310
Year 3 3975346 1401643 11406638 0.5787 2300547
Year 4 3231726 4633369 14638364 0.4823 1558510
TOTAL 9499939


The Net NPV after 4 years is -505056

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9499939 - 10004995 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Exam Semester to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Exam Semester has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Exam Semester can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Exam Semester, then the stock price of the Exam Semester should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Exam Semester should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of The Common Final Exam (A)

References & Further Readings

Iris Berdrow (2018), "The Common Final Exam (A) Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Harley-Davidson SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Recreational Products


Subur Tiasa Holdings Bhd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Forestry & Wood Products


Nihon Seiko SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


GlaxoSmithkline Healthcare SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


Fuxing China Group Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Apparel/Accessories


Techno Medica SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Medical Equipment & Supplies