×




Timing of Option Grants in UnitedHealth Group (A) Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Timing of Option Grants in UnitedHealth Group (A) case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Timing of Option Grants in UnitedHealth Group (A) case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Fabrizio Ferri. The Timing of Option Grants in UnitedHealth Group (A) (referred as “Unitedhealth Standpoint” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Finance & Accounting. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Boards, Crisis management, Executive compensation.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Timing of Option Grants in UnitedHealth Group (A) Case Study


This case is available in only hard copy format (HBP does not have digital distribution rights to the content). As a result, a digital Educator Copy of the case is not available through this web site.Faced with press allegations that executives' stock options might have been backdated, the Board of UnitedHealth Group needs to determine whether its accounting for the options was proper, and if not, what the restatement amount should be and what governance/compensation changes, if any, it should undertake. From an accounting standpoint, allows for the discussion of different methods to account for stock options--intrinsic value method versus fair value--and the differences in the degree of monitoring associated with amounts recognized in the financial statements and amounts only disclosed in footnotes. From a corporate governance standpoint, discusses how the board of directors should respond to this type of crisis in a company with an otherwise exceptional financial performance largely attributed to its long-tenured CEO.


Case Authors : Fabrizio Ferri

Topic : Finance & Accounting

Related Areas : Boards, Crisis management, Executive compensation




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Timing of Option Grants in UnitedHealth Group (A) Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10001103) -10001103 - -
Year 1 3449589 -6551514 3449589 0.9434 3254329
Year 2 3963705 -2587809 7413294 0.89 3527683
Year 3 3944938 1357129 11358232 0.8396 3312246
Year 4 3245557 4602686 14603789 0.7921 2570785
TOTAL 14603789 12665044




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2663941

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Net Present Value
3. Profitability Index
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Unitedhealth Standpoint have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Unitedhealth Standpoint shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Timing of Option Grants in UnitedHealth Group (A)

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Finance & Accounting Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Unitedhealth Standpoint often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Unitedhealth Standpoint needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10001103) -10001103 - -
Year 1 3449589 -6551514 3449589 0.8696 2999643
Year 2 3963705 -2587809 7413294 0.7561 2997130
Year 3 3944938 1357129 11358232 0.6575 2593861
Year 4 3245557 4602686 14603789 0.5718 1855658
TOTAL 10446292


The Net NPV after 4 years is 445189

(10446292 - 10001103 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10001103) -10001103 - -
Year 1 3449589 -6551514 3449589 0.8333 2874658
Year 2 3963705 -2587809 7413294 0.6944 2752573
Year 3 3944938 1357129 11358232 0.5787 2282950
Year 4 3245557 4602686 14603789 0.4823 1565180
TOTAL 9475361


The Net NPV after 4 years is -525742

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9475361 - 10001103 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Unitedhealth Standpoint to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Unitedhealth Standpoint has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Unitedhealth Standpoint can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Unitedhealth Standpoint, then the stock price of the Unitedhealth Standpoint should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Unitedhealth Standpoint should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Timing of Option Grants in UnitedHealth Group (A)

References & Further Readings

Fabrizio Ferri (2018), "Timing of Option Grants in UnitedHealth Group (A) Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Doshisha Co Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Appliance & Tool


Akebono Brake Industry SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Parts


King Fook SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Retail (Specialty)


ARB Corporation SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Parts


Jinhui Liquor SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Beverages (Alcoholic)


Fujicco Co Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


Azul SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Transportation , Airline


CBA Florida SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Healthcare Facilities


S Line Co SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Transportation , Trucking