×




Ensina!, Portuguese Version Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Ensina!, Portuguese Version case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Ensina!, Portuguese Version case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by John J-H Kim, Alejandra Meraz Velasco, Christine An. The Ensina!, Portuguese Version (referred as “Ensina Education” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Organizational Development. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Entrepreneurship, Government, Organizational culture, Social responsibility.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Ensina!, Portuguese Version Case Study


In 2011, a group of passionate social entrepreneurs in Rio de Janeiro, with the support and encouragement of several prominent philanthropists and members of government, launch Ensina!, seizing Brazil's unprecedented economic growth and national commitment to education. The new independent educational non-profit is to be part of Teach For All, a global network of organizations inspired by Teach For America. While Ensina! is quickly able to raise the initial capital, recruit graduates from top colleges, garner positive press, and demonstrate early success in increasing student performance, the organization runs into a number of operational challenges in implementing its programs in schools. After pursuing various avenues to address obstacles for Ensina!'s execution found in navigating national education policy and funding, forging partnerships with municipal and state governments, confronting widespread cultural perspectives on teaching as a profession, and managing relationships with local school administrators and staff, Ensina!'s staff and board, despite some success and demonstrated impact, decide to suspend the program in January. Following this decision, Fabio Campos, the most recent CEO of Ensina!, contemplates the possibility of relauching a restructured Ensina! to help bring about enduring, transformative reform to Brazil's public education system, which he believes to be crucial to the future success of Brazil as a nation. The case presents students the opportunity to explore conditions necessary for successful collaborations between non-profit organizations and the government, grapple with the challenges of long-term large-scale performance improvement in public education, and examine Ensina!'s goals in public education reform and different operational strategies for organizations like Ensina! to consider implementing in the future.


Case Authors : John J-H Kim, Alejandra Meraz Velasco, Christine An

Topic : Organizational Development

Related Areas : Entrepreneurship, Government, Organizational culture, Social responsibility




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Ensina!, Portuguese Version Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10018634) -10018634 - -
Year 1 3456969 -6561665 3456969 0.9434 3261292
Year 2 3955092 -2606573 7412061 0.89 3520018
Year 3 3966881 1360308 11378942 0.8396 3330670
Year 4 3224685 4584993 14603627 0.7921 2554253
TOTAL 14603627 12666232




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2647598

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Profitability Index
3. Payback Period
4. Net Present Value

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Ensina Education shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Ensina Education have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Ensina!, Portuguese Version

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Organizational Development Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Ensina Education often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Ensina Education needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10018634) -10018634 - -
Year 1 3456969 -6561665 3456969 0.8696 3006060
Year 2 3955092 -2606573 7412061 0.7561 2990618
Year 3 3966881 1360308 11378942 0.6575 2608289
Year 4 3224685 4584993 14603627 0.5718 1843724
TOTAL 10448691


The Net NPV after 4 years is 430057

(10448691 - 10018634 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10018634) -10018634 - -
Year 1 3456969 -6561665 3456969 0.8333 2880808
Year 2 3955092 -2606573 7412061 0.6944 2746592
Year 3 3966881 1360308 11378942 0.5787 2295649
Year 4 3224685 4584993 14603627 0.4823 1555114
TOTAL 9478162


The Net NPV after 4 years is -540472

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9478162 - 10018634 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Ensina Education to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Ensina Education has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Ensina Education can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Ensina Education, then the stock price of the Ensina Education should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Ensina Education should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Ensina!, Portuguese Version

References & Further Readings

John J-H Kim, Alejandra Meraz Velasco, Christine An (2018), "Ensina!, Portuguese Version Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Norstra Energy SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil & Gas Operations


Frtek SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Communications Equipment


Summit Germany SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations


Tong Da Cable A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Misc. Fabricated Products


LINX ON NM SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Cogra SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Constr. - Supplies & Fixtures


Denki Kagaku Kogyo K.K. SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


Stellar Acquisition III SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


MICROmega SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Business Services