×




Ensina!, Portuguese Version Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Ensina!, Portuguese Version case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Ensina!, Portuguese Version case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by John J-H Kim, Alejandra Meraz Velasco, Christine An. The Ensina!, Portuguese Version (referred as “Ensina Education” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Organizational Development. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Entrepreneurship, Government, Organizational culture, Social responsibility.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Ensina!, Portuguese Version Case Study


In 2011, a group of passionate social entrepreneurs in Rio de Janeiro, with the support and encouragement of several prominent philanthropists and members of government, launch Ensina!, seizing Brazil's unprecedented economic growth and national commitment to education. The new independent educational non-profit is to be part of Teach For All, a global network of organizations inspired by Teach For America. While Ensina! is quickly able to raise the initial capital, recruit graduates from top colleges, garner positive press, and demonstrate early success in increasing student performance, the organization runs into a number of operational challenges in implementing its programs in schools. After pursuing various avenues to address obstacles for Ensina!'s execution found in navigating national education policy and funding, forging partnerships with municipal and state governments, confronting widespread cultural perspectives on teaching as a profession, and managing relationships with local school administrators and staff, Ensina!'s staff and board, despite some success and demonstrated impact, decide to suspend the program in January. Following this decision, Fabio Campos, the most recent CEO of Ensina!, contemplates the possibility of relauching a restructured Ensina! to help bring about enduring, transformative reform to Brazil's public education system, which he believes to be crucial to the future success of Brazil as a nation. The case presents students the opportunity to explore conditions necessary for successful collaborations between non-profit organizations and the government, grapple with the challenges of long-term large-scale performance improvement in public education, and examine Ensina!'s goals in public education reform and different operational strategies for organizations like Ensina! to consider implementing in the future.


Case Authors : John J-H Kim, Alejandra Meraz Velasco, Christine An

Topic : Organizational Development

Related Areas : Entrepreneurship, Government, Organizational culture, Social responsibility




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Ensina!, Portuguese Version Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10013900) -10013900 - -
Year 1 3458899 -6555001 3458899 0.9434 3263112
Year 2 3980162 -2574839 7439061 0.89 3542330
Year 3 3967708 1392869 11406769 0.8396 3331364
Year 4 3232553 4625422 14639322 0.7921 2560485
TOTAL 14639322 12697291




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2683391

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Net Present Value
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Ensina Education have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Ensina Education shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Ensina!, Portuguese Version

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Organizational Development Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Ensina Education often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Ensina Education needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10013900) -10013900 - -
Year 1 3458899 -6555001 3458899 0.8696 3007738
Year 2 3980162 -2574839 7439061 0.7561 3009574
Year 3 3967708 1392869 11406769 0.6575 2608832
Year 4 3232553 4625422 14639322 0.5718 1848223
TOTAL 10474368


The Net NPV after 4 years is 460468

(10474368 - 10013900 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10013900) -10013900 - -
Year 1 3458899 -6555001 3458899 0.8333 2882416
Year 2 3980162 -2574839 7439061 0.6944 2764001
Year 3 3967708 1392869 11406769 0.5787 2296127
Year 4 3232553 4625422 14639322 0.4823 1558909
TOTAL 9501453


The Net NPV after 4 years is -512447

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9501453 - 10013900 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Ensina Education to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Ensina Education has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Ensina Education can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Ensina Education, then the stock price of the Ensina Education should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Ensina Education should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Ensina!, Portuguese Version

References & Further Readings

John J-H Kim, Alejandra Meraz Velasco, Christine An (2018), "Ensina!, Portuguese Version Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Orion Oyj B SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Shimge Pump A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods


SATS Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Transportation , Misc. Transportation


Netflix SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Broadcasting & Cable TV


DCC SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil & Gas Operations


GlobeImmune SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Kansai Nerolac Paints SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


Global Medical SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations


FireEye SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming