Maple Leaf Foods (A): Leading Six Sigma Change Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Maple Leaf Foods (A): Leading Six Sigma Change case study

At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Maple Leaf Foods (A): Leading Six Sigma Change case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Brian Golden, Ken Mark. The Maple Leaf Foods (A): Leading Six Sigma Change (referred as “Leaf Maple” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Organizational Development. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Leadership, Managing people, Organizational structure.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment

Case Description of Maple Leaf Foods (A): Leading Six Sigma Change Case Study

Maple Leaf Foods is a leading global food processing company with operations in Canada, the United States, Europe, and Asia. The CEO and vice-president of Six Sigma (an approach and methodology for eliminating defects in any process) embarks on a revolutionary journey in this previously change-resistant multinational food business to upgrade the firm's leadership capabilities. The project was rolled out to three of the 10 independent operating companies, and he must analyze the launch to determine whether it is on track and what can be done differently or better.

Case Authors : Brian Golden, Ken Mark

Topic : Organizational Development

Related Areas : Leadership, Managing people, Organizational structure

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Maple Leaf Foods (A): Leading Six Sigma Change Case Study

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10018731) -10018731 - -
Year 1 3443428 -6575303 3443428 0.9434 3248517
Year 2 3953020 -2622283 7396448 0.89 3518174
Year 3 3968117 1345834 11364565 0.8396 3331708
Year 4 3225378 4571212 14589943 0.7921 2554801
TOTAL 14589943 12653200

The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2634469

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting

What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.

Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting

There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Profitability Index
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Leaf Maple have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Leaf Maple shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.

Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Maple Leaf Foods (A): Leading Six Sigma Change

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Organizational Development Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Leaf Maple often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Leaf Maple needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10018731) -10018731 - -
Year 1 3443428 -6575303 3443428 0.8696 2994285
Year 2 3953020 -2622283 7396448 0.7561 2989051
Year 3 3968117 1345834 11364565 0.6575 2609101
Year 4 3225378 4571212 14589943 0.5718 1844120
TOTAL 10436558

The Net NPV after 4 years is 417827

(10436558 - 10018731 )

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%

If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10018731) -10018731 - -
Year 1 3443428 -6575303 3443428 0.8333 2869523
Year 2 3953020 -2622283 7396448 0.6944 2745153
Year 3 3968117 1345834 11364565 0.5787 2296364
Year 4 3225378 4571212 14589943 0.4823 1555448
TOTAL 9466489

The Net NPV after 4 years is -552242

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9466489 - 10018731 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Leaf Maple to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.

Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Leaf Maple has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Leaf Maple can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Leaf Maple, then the stock price of the Leaf Maple should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Leaf Maple should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.

References & Further Readings

Brian Golden, Ken Mark (2018), "Maple Leaf Foods (A): Leading Six Sigma Change Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.