Organizational Transformation: Agency for Volunteer Service Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Organizational Transformation: Agency for Volunteer Service case study

At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Organizational Transformation: Agency for Volunteer Service case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Shirley Chan, Monica Park, Gilbert Wong, Joseph Chan. The Organizational Transformation: Agency for Volunteer Service (referred as “Avs Transformation” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Organizational Development. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Leadership.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment

---

Case Description of Organizational Transformation: Agency for Volunteer Service Case Study

Founded in 1970, the Agency for Volunteer Service (AVS) was a non-governmental organization in Hong Kong with the mission of facilitating volunteerism and managing education, health, and welfare services. For more than two decades, it played an active role in the Hong Kong social service sector. However, in the years 1998 to 2001, several factors prompted AVS to undergo organizational transformation: a temporary crisis in management, a change in the source of government funding signalling a shift in the organization's mission, and the United Nations' designation of 2001 as the International Year of Volunteers. These changes compelled AVS to carry out a strategic review in 2001 and undergo radical organizational transformation. How should it implement strategic change to incorporate this new vision? Introduces students to the concept of radical organizational transformation and familiarizes students with managerial competencies common to successful transformations.

Case Authors : Shirley Chan, Monica Park, Gilbert Wong, Joseph Chan

Topic : Organizational Development

Related Areas : Leadership

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Organizational Transformation: Agency for Volunteer Service Case Study

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 6 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10012229)	-10012229	-	-
Year 1	3469837	-6542392	3469837	0.9434	3273431
Year 2	3963387	-2579005	7433224	0.89	3527400
Year 3	3957362	1378357	11390586	0.8396	3322677
Year 4	3241867	4620224	14632453	0.7921	2567862
TOTAL			14632453		12691371

The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2679142

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting

What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.

---

Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting

There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Net Present Value
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Avs Transformation have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Avs Transformation shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.

---

Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Organizational Transformation: Agency for Volunteer Service

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Organizational Development Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Avs Transformation often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Avs Transformation needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 15 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10012229)	-10012229	-	-
Year 1	3469837	-6542392	3469837	0.8696	3017250
Year 2	3963387	-2579005	7433224	0.7561	2996890
Year 3	3957362	1378357	11390586	0.6575	2602030
Year 4	3241867	4620224	14632453	0.5718	1853548
TOTAL					10469717

The Net NPV after 4 years is 457488

(10469717 - 10012229 )

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%

If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 20 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10012229)	-10012229	-	-
Year 1	3469837	-6542392	3469837	0.8333	2891531
Year 2	3963387	-2579005	7433224	0.6944	2752352
Year 3	3957362	1378357	11390586	0.5787	2290140
Year 4	3241867	4620224	14632453	0.4823	1563400
TOTAL					9497423

The Net NPV after 4 years is -514806

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9497423 - 10012229 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Avs Transformation to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.

Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Avs Transformation has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Avs Transformation can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Avs Transformation, then the stock price of the Avs Transformation should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Avs Transformation should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.

---

Negotiation Strategy of Organizational Transformation: Agency for Volunteer Service

References & Further Readings

Shirley Chan, Monica Park, Gilbert Wong, Joseph Chan (2018), "Organizational Transformation: Agency for Volunteer Service Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.