×




Acindar and Its Corporate Volunteer Program Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Acindar and Its Corporate Volunteer Program case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Acindar and Its Corporate Volunteer Program case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Ariel Kievsky, Victoria Corti Maderna, Ruth Szvarc, Gabriel Berger. The Acindar and Its Corporate Volunteer Program (referred as “Acindar Acevedo” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Organizational Development. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Competitive strategy, Human resource management, Social enterprise.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Acindar and Its Corporate Volunteer Program Case Study


A family-owned business, Acindar was one of the most important steel companies in Argentina. After the 2001-2002 Argentine economic crisis, it yielded its controlling stake to a new investor--Belgo Mineira, a Brazilian company of Austrian origin. Arturo Acevedo Jr., the founder's grandson, kept his managerial position as company CEO and president. Acindar Foundation, through the initiative of the company's founder Arturo Acevedo (grandfather) and in its capacity as corporate social policy enforcer, engaged in comprehensive educational, health, and environmental activities for 40 years. Depicts the changes resulting from the incorporation of the new shareholders to the company and how they reflected on the foundation's management and the corporate HR area. The triggering factor was an initiative to develop a corporate volunteer program similar to the one Belgo Mineira had implemented in Brazil--a project that integrated foundation, corporate, and HR management efforts at each production plant.


Case Authors : Ariel Kievsky, Victoria Corti Maderna, Ruth Szvarc, Gabriel Berger

Topic : Organizational Development

Related Areas : Competitive strategy, Human resource management, Social enterprise




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Acindar and Its Corporate Volunteer Program Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10025362) -10025362 - -
Year 1 3454011 -6571351 3454011 0.9434 3258501
Year 2 3976302 -2595049 7430313 0.89 3538895
Year 3 3945994 1350945 11376307 0.8396 3313133
Year 4 3245625 4596570 14621932 0.7921 2570839
TOTAL 14621932 12681367




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2656005

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Net Present Value
3. Payback Period
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Acindar Acevedo shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Acindar Acevedo have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Acindar and Its Corporate Volunteer Program

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Organizational Development Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Acindar Acevedo often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Acindar Acevedo needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10025362) -10025362 - -
Year 1 3454011 -6571351 3454011 0.8696 3003488
Year 2 3976302 -2595049 7430313 0.7561 3006656
Year 3 3945994 1350945 11376307 0.6575 2594555
Year 4 3245625 4596570 14621932 0.5718 1855697
TOTAL 10460395


The Net NPV after 4 years is 435033

(10460395 - 10025362 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10025362) -10025362 - -
Year 1 3454011 -6571351 3454011 0.8333 2878343
Year 2 3976302 -2595049 7430313 0.6944 2761321
Year 3 3945994 1350945 11376307 0.5787 2283561
Year 4 3245625 4596570 14621932 0.4823 1565213
TOTAL 9488437


The Net NPV after 4 years is -536925

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9488437 - 10025362 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Acindar Acevedo to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Acindar Acevedo has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Acindar Acevedo can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Acindar Acevedo, then the stock price of the Acindar Acevedo should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Acindar Acevedo should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Acindar and Its Corporate Volunteer Program

References & Further Readings

Ariel Kievsky, Victoria Corti Maderna, Ruth Szvarc, Gabriel Berger (2018), "Acindar and Its Corporate Volunteer Program Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Kakiyasu Honten SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


Stereotaxis SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Medical Equipment & Supplies


Victory Securities SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Investment Services


Future Lifestyle Fashions Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Apparel/Accessories


Spectrum Brands SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Evans Dixon SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Investment Services


Cosmax SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Personal & Household Prods.


Wonik Cube SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


ABB SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls