×




Flagstar Companies, Inc. (Abridged) Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Flagstar Companies, Inc. (Abridged) case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Flagstar Companies, Inc. (Abridged) case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Stuart C. Gilson. The Flagstar Companies, Inc. (Abridged) (referred as “Flagstar Bondholders” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Finance & Accounting. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Financial management, Mergers & acquisitions, Negotiations.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Flagstar Companies, Inc. (Abridged) Case Study


A large restaurant chain undergoes a leveraged buyout and subsequent recapitalization. Financial and operating problems at the company force it to consider various restructuring options, including a prepackaged Chapter 11 exchange offer to its public bondholders. Two investment bankers hired by senior and junior creditors present competing company valuations to the bankruptcy court that differ by $700 million.


Case Authors : Stuart C. Gilson

Topic : Finance & Accounting

Related Areas : Financial management, Mergers & acquisitions, Negotiations




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Flagstar Companies, Inc. (Abridged) Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10007254) -10007254 - -
Year 1 3470051 -6537203 3470051 0.9434 3273633
Year 2 3958214 -2578989 7428265 0.89 3522796
Year 3 3944132 1365143 11372397 0.8396 3311569
Year 4 3241106 4606249 14613503 0.7921 2567260
TOTAL 14613503 12675258




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2668004

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Net Present Value
3. Profitability Index
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Flagstar Bondholders shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Flagstar Bondholders have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Flagstar Companies, Inc. (Abridged)

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Finance & Accounting Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Flagstar Bondholders often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Flagstar Bondholders needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10007254) -10007254 - -
Year 1 3470051 -6537203 3470051 0.8696 3017436
Year 2 3958214 -2578989 7428265 0.7561 2992978
Year 3 3944132 1365143 11372397 0.6575 2593331
Year 4 3241106 4606249 14613503 0.5718 1853113
TOTAL 10456858


The Net NPV after 4 years is 449604

(10456858 - 10007254 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10007254) -10007254 - -
Year 1 3470051 -6537203 3470051 0.8333 2891709
Year 2 3958214 -2578989 7428265 0.6944 2748760
Year 3 3944132 1365143 11372397 0.5787 2282484
Year 4 3241106 4606249 14613503 0.4823 1563033
TOTAL 9485986


The Net NPV after 4 years is -521268

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9485986 - 10007254 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Flagstar Bondholders to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Flagstar Bondholders has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Flagstar Bondholders can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Flagstar Bondholders, then the stock price of the Flagstar Bondholders should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Flagstar Bondholders should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Flagstar Companies, Inc. (Abridged)

References & Further Readings

Stuart C. Gilson (2018), "Flagstar Companies, Inc. (Abridged) Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Aisin Seiki Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Parts


EuroDry SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Transportation , Water Transportation


Jiangsu Protruly Vision Tech SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Scientific & Technical Instr.


China XD Plastics SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Containers & Packaging


CIT SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Consumer Financial Services


Banco Bpm SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Regional Banks


UnipolSai Assicurazioni SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Insurance (Prop. & Casualty)


Qurate Retail B SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Retail (Catalog & Mail Order)


Nine Dragons SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Containers & Packaging


Eris Lifesciences SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs