×




Cisco Systems: Developing a Human Capital Strategy (A) Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Cisco Systems: Developing a Human Capital Strategy (A) case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Cisco Systems: Developing a Human Capital Strategy (A) case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Jennifer A. Chatman, Charles A. O'Reilly. The Cisco Systems: Developing a Human Capital Strategy (A) (referred as “Cisco Human” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Organizational Development. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, IT, Leadership, Mergers & acquisitions.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Cisco Systems: Developing a Human Capital Strategy (A) Case Study


Like many technology organizations in the late 1990s, Cisco was booming. It grew so quickly, in fact, that it was bringing in up to 1,000 new employees each month. Cisco's solution was to acquire talent by buying small firms, topping out in one year with 24 separate acquisitions. However, in 2000 the dot-com bubble burst and Cisco quickly realized that it had another human capital challenge on its hands: How to develop, rather than hire, the strategic thinkers and leaders needed for the future. This case study explores the challenges facing Mary Eckenrod, Cisco's Vice President of Worldwide Talent, in developing a new human capital strategy to identify and develop leaders from within the company--and to do this in a company with no tradition of developing people internally. How can Cisco move from a "buy" to a "make" human capital strategy? The lessons from this case provide a template that other organizational leaders can use in managing organizations through various stages of evolution and different types of growth. Please note: This case also has a (B) supplement available.


Case Authors : Jennifer A. Chatman, Charles A. O'Reilly

Topic : Organizational Development

Related Areas : IT, Leadership, Mergers & acquisitions




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Cisco Systems: Developing a Human Capital Strategy (A) Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10018101) -10018101 - -
Year 1 3469145 -6548956 3469145 0.9434 3272778
Year 2 3976028 -2572928 7445173 0.89 3538651
Year 3 3967952 1395024 11413125 0.8396 3331569
Year 4 3228514 4623538 14641639 0.7921 2557285
TOTAL 14641639 12700284




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2682183

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Net Present Value
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Cisco Human shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Cisco Human have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Cisco Systems: Developing a Human Capital Strategy (A)

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Organizational Development Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Cisco Human often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Cisco Human needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10018101) -10018101 - -
Year 1 3469145 -6548956 3469145 0.8696 3016648
Year 2 3976028 -2572928 7445173 0.7561 3006448
Year 3 3967952 1395024 11413125 0.6575 2608993
Year 4 3228514 4623538 14641639 0.5718 1845913
TOTAL 10478002


The Net NPV after 4 years is 459901

(10478002 - 10018101 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10018101) -10018101 - -
Year 1 3469145 -6548956 3469145 0.8333 2890954
Year 2 3976028 -2572928 7445173 0.6944 2761131
Year 3 3967952 1395024 11413125 0.5787 2296269
Year 4 3228514 4623538 14641639 0.4823 1556961
TOTAL 9505314


The Net NPV after 4 years is -512787

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9505314 - 10018101 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Cisco Human to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Cisco Human has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Cisco Human can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Cisco Human, then the stock price of the Cisco Human should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Cisco Human should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Cisco Systems: Developing a Human Capital Strategy (A)

References & Further Readings

Jennifer A. Chatman, Charles A. O'Reilly (2018), "Cisco Systems: Developing a Human Capital Strategy (A) Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


USU Software AG SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Nanjing Julong Science A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemicals - Plastics & Rubber


Nichii Gakkan Co SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Healthcare Facilities


Yamaura Corp SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Massmart Holdings SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Retail (Department & Discount)


AnAn SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil & Gas Operations


Ship Finance Int SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Transportation , Water Transportation