×




Radio Station WEAA: Leading in A Challenging Situation Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Radio Station WEAA: Leading in A Challenging Situation case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Radio Station WEAA: Leading in A Challenging Situation case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Mary K. Foster. The Radio Station WEAA: Leading in A Challenging Situation (referred as “Station Fiske” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Organizational Development. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Leadership, Strategic planning.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Radio Station WEAA: Leading in A Challenging Situation Case Study


Corin Fiske, the recently hired Director of News and Public Affairs at WEAA a public radio station licensed and owned by Morgan State University (MSU) in Baltimore, Maryland was facing some urgent issues and had concerns about the level of support and motivation among her staff for her and for the station's goals. For many years educators at the University had run the station as an educational resource for students and as a community service for the city. Over the past five years, the station had suffered from turnover in key positions (e.g., four General Managers in four years, Membership Director position open for over a year). The station had not had a fund raising drive in at least two years and had an operating loss of about $200,000 per year in recent years. A somewhat laissez-faire approach to management had been used at the station. Fiske had been recruited to help the station grow and achieve its potential. She was an experienced TV reporter and radio show host. She had an entrepreneurial spirit and viewed herself as a change agent. She had inherited a large staff of 30 direct reports, 29 were volunteers, one was paid, many had been at the station a long time (two to ten years). Most of the volunteers had no journalism or broadcast experience, other than their work at the station. The quality of the station's news and talk show programming had suffered from lack of knowledge of public radio broadcast standards and from lack of commitment by some hosts. Since Fiske began working at the station, she had experienced some challenges: staff being late, non-responsive, resistant to change, and argumentative/combative, plus a resignation. What could she do to ensure her success and the success of the organization? She urgently needed to strategize with her boss and develop a plan of action.


Case Authors : Mary K. Foster

Topic : Organizational Development

Related Areas : Leadership, Strategic planning




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Radio Station WEAA: Leading in A Challenging Situation Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10009662) -10009662 - -
Year 1 3447853 -6561809 3447853 0.9434 3252692
Year 2 3970735 -2591074 7418588 0.89 3533940
Year 3 3946061 1354987 11364649 0.8396 3313189
Year 4 3229211 4584198 14593860 0.7921 2557838
TOTAL 14593860 12657658




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2647996

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Net Present Value
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Station Fiske shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Station Fiske have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Radio Station WEAA: Leading in A Challenging Situation

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Organizational Development Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Station Fiske often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Station Fiske needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10009662) -10009662 - -
Year 1 3447853 -6561809 3447853 0.8696 2998133
Year 2 3970735 -2591074 7418588 0.7561 3002446
Year 3 3946061 1354987 11364649 0.6575 2594599
Year 4 3229211 4584198 14593860 0.5718 1846312
TOTAL 10441490


The Net NPV after 4 years is 431828

(10441490 - 10009662 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10009662) -10009662 - -
Year 1 3447853 -6561809 3447853 0.8333 2873211
Year 2 3970735 -2591074 7418588 0.6944 2757455
Year 3 3946061 1354987 11364649 0.5787 2283600
Year 4 3229211 4584198 14593860 0.4823 1557297
TOTAL 9471563


The Net NPV after 4 years is -538099

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9471563 - 10009662 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Station Fiske to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Station Fiske has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Station Fiske can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Station Fiske, then the stock price of the Station Fiske should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Station Fiske should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Radio Station WEAA: Leading in A Challenging Situation

References & Further Readings

Mary K. Foster (2018), "Radio Station WEAA: Leading in A Challenging Situation Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


K M Sugar Mills Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


Forza Land Indonesia SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Fuso Pharmaceutical SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


J.Jill SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Retail (Apparel)


Hansol Paper Co Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Paper & Paper Products


Indel B SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods


Mediaflag SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Business Services


Bankia SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Money Center Banks