×




Growth and Profitability at Fresenius Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Growth and Profitability at Fresenius case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Growth and Profitability at Fresenius case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Joel Podolny, Vincent Dessain, Monika Stachowiak, Anders Sjoman. The Growth and Profitability at Fresenius (referred as “Fresenius Schneider” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Organizational Development. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Cross-cultural management, Entrepreneurial management, Organizational structure.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Growth and Profitability at Fresenius Case Study


In March 2005, Mark Schneider, CEO of Fresenius, is considering the group's strategic and organizational future. The highly decentralized 7 billion euro German health care group is active in three different business units, with the largest, FMC AG, listed separately from the parent Fresenius AG and representing the lion's share of the company's revenue and profit. A decentralized approach had let the group units grow independently over the years, and Fresenius took pride in its adaptive, entrepreneurial spirit. Schneider, however, wonders whether the decentralized approach will allow the group to continue to grow in a coordinated and cost-conscious fashion. How should he combine the company's entrepreneurial and profit-oriented culture with any latent synergies in the existing organization? Although Fresenius looks healthy at the moment, Schneider knows that the company's future is tied to improved sales and profitability.


Case Authors : Joel Podolny, Vincent Dessain, Monika Stachowiak, Anders Sjoman

Topic : Organizational Development

Related Areas : Cross-cultural management, Entrepreneurial management, Organizational structure




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Growth and Profitability at Fresenius Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10029429) -10029429 - -
Year 1 3463114 -6566315 3463114 0.9434 3267089
Year 2 3972297 -2594018 7435411 0.89 3535330
Year 3 3954073 1360055 11389484 0.8396 3319916
Year 4 3222658 4582713 14612142 0.7921 2552647
TOTAL 14612142 12674982




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2645553

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Profitability Index
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Fresenius Schneider shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Fresenius Schneider have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Growth and Profitability at Fresenius

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Organizational Development Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Fresenius Schneider often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Fresenius Schneider needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10029429) -10029429 - -
Year 1 3463114 -6566315 3463114 0.8696 3011403
Year 2 3972297 -2594018 7435411 0.7561 3003627
Year 3 3954073 1360055 11389484 0.6575 2599867
Year 4 3222658 4582713 14612142 0.5718 1842565
TOTAL 10457463


The Net NPV after 4 years is 428034

(10457463 - 10029429 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10029429) -10029429 - -
Year 1 3463114 -6566315 3463114 0.8333 2885928
Year 2 3972297 -2594018 7435411 0.6944 2758540
Year 3 3954073 1360055 11389484 0.5787 2288237
Year 4 3222658 4582713 14612142 0.4823 1554137
TOTAL 9486841


The Net NPV after 4 years is -542588

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9486841 - 10029429 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Fresenius Schneider to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Fresenius Schneider has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Fresenius Schneider can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Fresenius Schneider, then the stock price of the Fresenius Schneider should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Fresenius Schneider should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Growth and Profitability at Fresenius

References & Further Readings

Joel Podolny, Vincent Dessain, Monika Stachowiak, Anders Sjoman (2018), "Growth and Profitability at Fresenius Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Hyungkuk F&B SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


Omni Ventures, Inc SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Apparel/Accessories


Guanghe Landscape SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Audio & Video Equipment


First Baking Co Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


STR SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Semiconductors


Splendor Sci&Tec A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Communications Equipment