×




Sippican Corporation (A), Chinese Version Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Sippican Corporation (A), Chinese Version case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Sippican Corporation (A), Chinese Version case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Robert S. Kaplan. The Sippican Corporation (A), Chinese Version (referred as “Sippican Activity” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Finance & Accounting. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Marketing, Strategic planning.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Sippican Corporation (A), Chinese Version Case Study


Presents a time-driven version of the Wilkerson Co. activity-based costing case (101092). Faced with declining profits, Sippican Corp. is struggling to understand why it is encountering severe price competition on one product line. The controller collects data that will enable development of a time-driven, activity-based cost model to explain better the different demands of each product line on Sippican's indirect and support resources. Illustrates a powerful connection between strategic planning and operational budgeting.


Case Authors : Robert S. Kaplan

Topic : Finance & Accounting

Related Areas : Marketing, Strategic planning




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Sippican Corporation (A), Chinese Version Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10024738) -10024738 - -
Year 1 3463907 -6560831 3463907 0.9434 3267837
Year 2 3982681 -2578150 7446588 0.89 3544572
Year 3 3958637 1380487 11405225 0.8396 3323748
Year 4 3230885 4611372 14636110 0.7921 2559164
TOTAL 14636110 12695320




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2670582

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Net Present Value
3. Payback Period
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Sippican Activity have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Sippican Activity shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Sippican Corporation (A), Chinese Version

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Finance & Accounting Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Sippican Activity often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Sippican Activity needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10024738) -10024738 - -
Year 1 3463907 -6560831 3463907 0.8696 3012093
Year 2 3982681 -2578150 7446588 0.7561 3011479
Year 3 3958637 1380487 11405225 0.6575 2602868
Year 4 3230885 4611372 14636110 0.5718 1847269
TOTAL 10473709


The Net NPV after 4 years is 448971

(10473709 - 10024738 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10024738) -10024738 - -
Year 1 3463907 -6560831 3463907 0.8333 2886589
Year 2 3982681 -2578150 7446588 0.6944 2765751
Year 3 3958637 1380487 11405225 0.5787 2290878
Year 4 3230885 4611372 14636110 0.4823 1558104
TOTAL 9501322


The Net NPV after 4 years is -523416

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9501322 - 10024738 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Sippican Activity to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Sippican Activity has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Sippican Activity can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Sippican Activity, then the stock price of the Sippican Activity should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Sippican Activity should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Sippican Corporation (A), Chinese Version

References & Further Readings

Robert S. Kaplan (2018), "Sippican Corporation (A), Chinese Version Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Cleveland BioLabs SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


BMW ST SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Manufacturers


PORTO SEGURO ON SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Insurance (Prop. & Casualty)


Simonds Group Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Ricky Putra Globalindo SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Apparel/Accessories


Indofood SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


MFM Korea SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Apparel/Accessories


JW Shinyak SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Sumitomo Riko SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Fabricated Plastic & Rubber


Inesa Intelligent Tech B SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls