Building a Networked Organization: Restructuring the IT Department at MWH (A) Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Building a Networked Organization: Restructuring the IT Department at MWH (A) case study

At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Building a Networked Organization: Restructuring the IT Department at MWH (A) case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Rob Cross, Amy L. Halliday, Vic Gulas, Andrew Parker. The Building a Networked Organization: Restructuring the IT Department at MWH (A) (referred as “Gulas Ona” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Organizational Development. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Networking, Organizational structure, Reorganization, Strategy.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment

---

Case Description of Building a Networked Organization: Restructuring the IT Department at MWH (A) Case Study

In this first in a series of cases on organizational network analysis (ONA), Vic Gulas, the new head of IT at the engineering consulting firm MWH Consulting, is charged with turning a geographically organized department into one organized by function. He knows that the success of the reorganization will depend on effective collaboration, but he cannot get a sense of what collaborative relationships do and do not exist by looking at a formal organizational chart. Instead, Gulas uses ONA, a method for mapping relationships among people in a group. In the ONA results, Gulas sees a group still fragmented by geography and constrained by hierarchy and other gaps in connectivity. After studying the highly detailed assessment of working relationships within the IT department, Gulas must decide in the A case what steps he can take to align the department's network with its business objectives.

Case Authors : Rob Cross, Amy L. Halliday, Vic Gulas, Andrew Parker

Topic : Organizational Development

Related Areas : Networking, Organizational structure, Reorganization, Strategy

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Building a Networked Organization: Restructuring the IT Department at MWH (A) Case Study

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 6 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10014194)	-10014194	-	-
Year 1	3463745	-6550449	3463745	0.9434	3267684
Year 2	3971812	-2578637	7435557	0.89	3534899
Year 3	3958430	1379793	11393987	0.8396	3323574
Year 4	3233305	4613098	14627292	0.7921	2561080
TOTAL			14627292		12687237

The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2673043

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting

What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.

---

Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting

There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Net Present Value
3. Payback Period
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Gulas Ona shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Gulas Ona have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.

---

Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Building a Networked Organization: Restructuring the IT Department at MWH (A)

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Organizational Development Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Gulas Ona often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Gulas Ona needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 15 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10014194)	-10014194	-	-
Year 1	3463745	-6550449	3463745	0.8696	3011952
Year 2	3971812	-2578637	7435557	0.7561	3003260
Year 3	3958430	1379793	11393987	0.6575	2602732
Year 4	3233305	4613098	14627292	0.5718	1848653
TOTAL					10466597

The Net NPV after 4 years is 452403

(10466597 - 10014194 )

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%

If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 20 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10014194)	-10014194	-	-
Year 1	3463745	-6550449	3463745	0.8333	2886454
Year 2	3971812	-2578637	7435557	0.6944	2758203
Year 3	3958430	1379793	11393987	0.5787	2290758
Year 4	3233305	4613098	14627292	0.4823	1559271
TOTAL					9494686

The Net NPV after 4 years is -519508

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9494686 - 10014194 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Gulas Ona to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.

Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Gulas Ona has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Gulas Ona can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Gulas Ona, then the stock price of the Gulas Ona should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Gulas Ona should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.

---

Negotiation Strategy of Building a Networked Organization: Restructuring the IT Department at MWH (A)

References & Further Readings

Rob Cross, Amy L. Halliday, Vic Gulas, Andrew Parker (2018), "Building a Networked Organization: Restructuring the IT Department at MWH (A) Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.