×




Corporate Inversions: Stanley Works and the Lure of Tax Havens Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Corporate Inversions: Stanley Works and the Lure of Tax Havens case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Corporate Inversions: Stanley Works and the Lure of Tax Havens case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Mihir A. Desai, Mark F. Veblen, James R. Hines Jr.. The Corporate Inversions: Stanley Works and the Lure of Tax Havens (referred as “Tax Haven” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Finance & Accounting. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Financial analysis, Financial management, International business, Mergers & acquisitions, Performance measurement, Policy.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Corporate Inversions: Stanley Works and the Lure of Tax Havens Case Study


In response to Stanley Work's announcement that it is moving to Bermuda--and the associated jump in market value--a major competitor sets out to determine how the market is valuing the consequences of moving to a tax haven and whether his company should invert to a tax haven. In particular, the competitor's CFO needs to attribute Stanley's stock price movements across several dimensions of potential tax savings (tax savings on foreign operations and on interest payments) to see if there might be something else at play (earnings stripping). In the process, the mechanics and incentives created by the international tax regime are illustrated. To obtain executable spreadsheets (courseware), please contact our customer service department at custserv@hbsp.harvard.edu.


Case Authors : Mihir A. Desai, Mark F. Veblen, James R. Hines Jr.

Topic : Finance & Accounting

Related Areas : Financial analysis, Financial management, International business, Mergers & acquisitions, Performance measurement, Policy




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Corporate Inversions: Stanley Works and the Lure of Tax Havens Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10022161) -10022161 - -
Year 1 3452114 -6570047 3452114 0.9434 3256711
Year 2 3981426 -2588621 7433540 0.89 3543455
Year 3 3959638 1371017 11393178 0.8396 3324588
Year 4 3231235 4602252 14624413 0.7921 2559441
TOTAL 14624413 12684195




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2662034

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Net Present Value
3. Payback Period
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Tax Haven have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Tax Haven shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Corporate Inversions: Stanley Works and the Lure of Tax Havens

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Finance & Accounting Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Tax Haven often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Tax Haven needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10022161) -10022161 - -
Year 1 3452114 -6570047 3452114 0.8696 3001838
Year 2 3981426 -2588621 7433540 0.7561 3010530
Year 3 3959638 1371017 11393178 0.6575 2603526
Year 4 3231235 4602252 14624413 0.5718 1847469
TOTAL 10463364


The Net NPV after 4 years is 441203

(10463364 - 10022161 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10022161) -10022161 - -
Year 1 3452114 -6570047 3452114 0.8333 2876762
Year 2 3981426 -2588621 7433540 0.6944 2764879
Year 3 3959638 1371017 11393178 0.5787 2291457
Year 4 3231235 4602252 14624413 0.4823 1558273
TOTAL 9491371


The Net NPV after 4 years is -530790

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9491371 - 10022161 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Tax Haven to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Tax Haven has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Tax Haven can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Tax Haven, then the stock price of the Tax Haven should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Tax Haven should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Corporate Inversions: Stanley Works and the Lure of Tax Havens

References & Further Readings

Mihir A. Desai, Mark F. Veblen, James R. Hines Jr. (2018), "Corporate Inversions: Stanley Works and the Lure of Tax Havens Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Mutual SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods


Sella Real Estate SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations


Asahi Industries SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Constr. - Supplies & Fixtures


ASML Holding SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Semiconductors


Zeder SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


Promithian Global Ventures SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Non-Metallic Mining


Goodwin SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Misc. Fabricated Products


RCE Capital Berhad SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Consumer Financial Services


Techno Mathematical SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Marr SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Retail (Grocery)