×




Dollars and Sense: The Implications of CEO Compensation for Organizational Performance Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Dollars and Sense: The Implications of CEO Compensation for Organizational Performance case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Dollars and Sense: The Implications of CEO Compensation for Organizational Performance case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Shelley A. Davis, Jason D. Ketchen Jr., David Ketchen Jr.. The Dollars and Sense: The Implications of CEO Compensation for Organizational Performance (referred as “Compensation Ceo” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Organizational Development. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Executive compensation, Leadership.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Dollars and Sense: The Implications of CEO Compensation for Organizational Performance Case Study


Crafting a compensation package for an organization's chief executive officer (CEO) that will help the firm maximize its performance is a vexing challenge for a board of directors. Management theory offers boards several practical hints. A board can put its CEO and the firm in the best position to be successful by (1) creating strong incentives for the CEO to act in the firm's best interest at all times; (2) benchmarking a CEO's performance and compensation relative to that of very high performing CEOs in the industry; (3) diagnosing and responding to CEOs' feelings about equity relative to their peers; (4) paying a CEO with uniquely valuable knowledge, skills, and ability at the top of the market; (5) offering retention incentives if a proven performer with unique skills is leading a company; (6) resisting the temptation to simply mimic the compensation packages that work for leading firms; and (7) considering candidates' social ties when recruiting a new CEO.


Case Authors : Shelley A. Davis, Jason D. Ketchen Jr., David Ketchen Jr.

Topic : Organizational Development

Related Areas : Executive compensation, Leadership




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Dollars and Sense: The Implications of CEO Compensation for Organizational Performance Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10005110) -10005110 - -
Year 1 3447724 -6557386 3447724 0.9434 3252570
Year 2 3979000 -2578386 7426724 0.89 3541296
Year 3 3975038 1396652 11401762 0.8396 3337519
Year 4 3242270 4638922 14644032 0.7921 2568182
TOTAL 14644032 12699566




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2694456

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Payback Period
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Compensation Ceo shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Compensation Ceo have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Dollars and Sense: The Implications of CEO Compensation for Organizational Performance

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Organizational Development Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Compensation Ceo often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Compensation Ceo needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10005110) -10005110 - -
Year 1 3447724 -6557386 3447724 0.8696 2998021
Year 2 3979000 -2578386 7426724 0.7561 3008696
Year 3 3975038 1396652 11401762 0.6575 2613652
Year 4 3242270 4638922 14644032 0.5718 1853778
TOTAL 10474147


The Net NPV after 4 years is 469037

(10474147 - 10005110 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10005110) -10005110 - -
Year 1 3447724 -6557386 3447724 0.8333 2873103
Year 2 3979000 -2578386 7426724 0.6944 2763194
Year 3 3975038 1396652 11401762 0.5787 2300369
Year 4 3242270 4638922 14644032 0.4823 1563595
TOTAL 9500262


The Net NPV after 4 years is -504848

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9500262 - 10005110 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Compensation Ceo to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Compensation Ceo has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Compensation Ceo can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Compensation Ceo, then the stock price of the Compensation Ceo should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Compensation Ceo should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Dollars and Sense: The Implications of CEO Compensation for Organizational Performance

References & Further Readings

Shelley A. Davis, Jason D. Ketchen Jr., David Ketchen Jr. (2018), "Dollars and Sense: The Implications of CEO Compensation for Organizational Performance Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


MILLS ON SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Rental & Leasing


Invengo A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Elanix Biotechnologies SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Infinera SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Communications Equipment


Yue Da Mining SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Metal Mining


Wuxi Biologics Cayman SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Bbca A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


Entasis Therapeutics SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Cars.com SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Services