×




Bertelsmann: The Ownership Question Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Bertelsmann: The Ownership Question case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Bertelsmann: The Ownership Question case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by F. A. Neumann, Josep Tapies. The Bertelsmann: The Ownership Question (referred as “Bertelsmann Mohn” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Organizational Development. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Communication, Mergers & acquisitions.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Bertelsmann: The Ownership Question Case Study


Leaders of Bertelsmann AG (BAG), the 5th largest media conglomerate worldwide, and first in Europe, had a decision to make in early 2006. Under an agreement it had reached in 2000, GBL, its only shareholder not controlled by the Mohn family, had the right to sell its 25% stake in the company in the stock market, provided it did not reach an agreement with the Mohn family beforehand for a buyback of this share package for a price to be negotiated. Briefly outlines Bertelsmann's business lines, corporate culture, and its governance structure in terms of family and business control, and the conditions of both alternatives and their consequences for the company are described (IPO vs. share buyback). Students are expected to deliver a well-rounded rationale for their recommendation on which alternative to take, as if they were in the shoes of Gunter Thielen, CEO of Bertelsmann.


Case Authors : F. A. Neumann, Josep Tapies

Topic : Organizational Development

Related Areas : Communication, Mergers & acquisitions




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Bertelsmann: The Ownership Question Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10028005) -10028005 - -
Year 1 3449726 -6578279 3449726 0.9434 3254458
Year 2 3964912 -2613367 7414638 0.89 3528758
Year 3 3965833 1352466 11380471 0.8396 3329790
Year 4 3235113 4587579 14615584 0.7921 2562513
TOTAL 14615584 12675518




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2647513

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Net Present Value
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Bertelsmann Mohn shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Bertelsmann Mohn have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Bertelsmann: The Ownership Question

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Organizational Development Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Bertelsmann Mohn often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Bertelsmann Mohn needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10028005) -10028005 - -
Year 1 3449726 -6578279 3449726 0.8696 2999762
Year 2 3964912 -2613367 7414638 0.7561 2998043
Year 3 3965833 1352466 11380471 0.6575 2607600
Year 4 3235113 4587579 14615584 0.5718 1849686
TOTAL 10455091


The Net NPV after 4 years is 427086

(10455091 - 10028005 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10028005) -10028005 - -
Year 1 3449726 -6578279 3449726 0.8333 2874772
Year 2 3964912 -2613367 7414638 0.6944 2753411
Year 3 3965833 1352466 11380471 0.5787 2295042
Year 4 3235113 4587579 14615584 0.4823 1560143
TOTAL 9483368


The Net NPV after 4 years is -544637

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9483368 - 10028005 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Bertelsmann Mohn to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Bertelsmann Mohn has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Bertelsmann Mohn can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Bertelsmann Mohn, then the stock price of the Bertelsmann Mohn should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Bertelsmann Mohn should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Bertelsmann: The Ownership Question

References & Further Readings

F. A. Neumann, Josep Tapies (2018), "Bertelsmann: The Ownership Question Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


AXIS Bank SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Regional Banks


Virtual Sourcing, In SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Personal & Household Prods.


Banner SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Regional Banks


Dairei SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


General Finance SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Containers & Packaging


Cultural Investment SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Constr. - Supplies & Fixtures


Snap-On SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Appliance & Tool


Country Garden Holdings SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Sime Darby SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Retail (Specialty)