×




WM Wrigley JR. Company: Innovation in China's Confectionery Market Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for WM Wrigley JR. Company: Innovation in China's Confectionery Market case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. WM Wrigley JR. Company: Innovation in China's Confectionery Market case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Ali F. Farhoomand, Candise Pong-Wa Wai. The WM Wrigley JR. Company: Innovation in China's Confectionery Market (referred as “Wrigley Mars” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Sales & Marketing. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Mergers & acquisitions, Product development.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of WM Wrigley JR. Company: Innovation in China's Confectionery Market Case Study


In October 2008, WM Wrigley Jr. Company ("Wrigley"), the world's largest gum-maker, completed a US$23 billion friendly takeover by Mars, a US-based, family-owned company and a global leader in confectionery products. The takeover made Mars the world's largest confectionery company, and Wrigley became a standalone subsidiary of Mars. Wrigley had been outperforming the rest of the confectionery industry in the 10 years leading up to the merger. The merger allowed both Wrigley and Mars to leverage each other's strengths to continue their paths of growth. Mars was attracted by Wrigley's success in China and its product innovation. How has Wrigley succeeded in China's chewing-gum market through product innovation? Bolstered by Mars's financial strength and product portfolio, what product-innovation strategy can it adopt to seize the opportunities for sustained success?


Case Authors : Ali F. Farhoomand, Candise Pong-Wa Wai

Topic : Sales & Marketing

Related Areas : Mergers & acquisitions, Product development




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for WM Wrigley JR. Company: Innovation in China's Confectionery Market Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10015268) -10015268 - -
Year 1 3470931 -6544337 3470931 0.9434 3274463
Year 2 3968081 -2576256 7439012 0.89 3531578
Year 3 3961663 1385407 11400675 0.8396 3326289
Year 4 3240732 4626139 14641407 0.7921 2566963
TOTAL 14641407 12699293




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2684025

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Profitability Index
4. Net Present Value

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Wrigley Mars shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Wrigley Mars have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of WM Wrigley JR. Company: Innovation in China's Confectionery Market

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Sales & Marketing Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Wrigley Mars often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Wrigley Mars needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10015268) -10015268 - -
Year 1 3470931 -6544337 3470931 0.8696 3018201
Year 2 3968081 -2576256 7439012 0.7561 3000439
Year 3 3961663 1385407 11400675 0.6575 2604858
Year 4 3240732 4626139 14641407 0.5718 1852899
TOTAL 10476397


The Net NPV after 4 years is 461129

(10476397 - 10015268 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10015268) -10015268 - -
Year 1 3470931 -6544337 3470931 0.8333 2892443
Year 2 3968081 -2576256 7439012 0.6944 2755612
Year 3 3961663 1385407 11400675 0.5787 2292629
Year 4 3240732 4626139 14641407 0.4823 1562853
TOTAL 9503536


The Net NPV after 4 years is -511732

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9503536 - 10015268 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Wrigley Mars to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Wrigley Mars has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Wrigley Mars can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Wrigley Mars, then the stock price of the Wrigley Mars should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Wrigley Mars should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of WM Wrigley JR. Company: Innovation in China's Confectionery Market

References & Further Readings

Ali F. Farhoomand, Candise Pong-Wa Wai (2018), "WM Wrigley JR. Company: Innovation in China's Confectionery Market Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Shenzhen Yinghe Tech SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods


Ipl Plastics SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Fabricated Plastic & Rubber


Gascogne SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Forestry & Wood Products


ISMT Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Constr. - Supplies & Fixtures


Zuari Agro Chemicals Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


Onkyo SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Audio & Video Equipment


Liangxin Electri A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Bonso Electronics Int SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods