×




Fortis Industries, Inc. (A) Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Fortis Industries, Inc. (A) case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Fortis Industries, Inc. (A) case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Rowland T. Moriarty Jr., David May, Gordon Swartz. The Fortis Industries, Inc. (A) (referred as “Strapping Fortis” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Sales & Marketing. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Pricing.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Fortis Industries, Inc. (A) Case Study


Fortis Industries' packaging division manufactures steel and plastic strapping. In 2007, the company underwent a leveraged buyout. The case focuses on the packaging division's need to maintain high profitability in a declining market for steel strapping. Since 1998, Fortis has been losing 1% per year of the steel strapping market. Since then, there has also been significant erosion of prices. The division president is faced with 1) decreasing price to increase market share, or 2) maintain/increase cash flow. The specific decision revolves around the potential adoption of a price-flex system that is designed to authorize selective discounting by the division's sales personnel.


Case Authors : Rowland T. Moriarty Jr., David May, Gordon Swartz

Topic : Sales & Marketing

Related Areas : Pricing




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Fortis Industries, Inc. (A) Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10017859) -10017859 - -
Year 1 3456602 -6561257 3456602 0.9434 3260945
Year 2 3974202 -2587055 7430804 0.89 3537026
Year 3 3975627 1388572 11406431 0.8396 3338013
Year 4 3236000 4624572 14642431 0.7921 2563215
TOTAL 14642431 12699199




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2681340

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Profitability Index
3. Net Present Value
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Strapping Fortis have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Strapping Fortis shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Fortis Industries, Inc. (A)

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Sales & Marketing Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Strapping Fortis often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Strapping Fortis needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10017859) -10017859 - -
Year 1 3456602 -6561257 3456602 0.8696 3005741
Year 2 3974202 -2587055 7430804 0.7561 3005068
Year 3 3975627 1388572 11406431 0.6575 2614039
Year 4 3236000 4624572 14642431 0.5718 1850194
TOTAL 10475041


The Net NPV after 4 years is 457182

(10475041 - 10017859 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10017859) -10017859 - -
Year 1 3456602 -6561257 3456602 0.8333 2880502
Year 2 3974202 -2587055 7430804 0.6944 2759863
Year 3 3975627 1388572 11406431 0.5787 2300710
Year 4 3236000 4624572 14642431 0.4823 1560571
TOTAL 9501645


The Net NPV after 4 years is -516214

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9501645 - 10017859 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Strapping Fortis to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Strapping Fortis has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Strapping Fortis can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Strapping Fortis, then the stock price of the Strapping Fortis should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Strapping Fortis should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Fortis Industries, Inc. (A)

References & Further Readings

Rowland T. Moriarty Jr., David May, Gordon Swartz (2018), "Fortis Industries, Inc. (A) Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


S-Mac SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


PCI SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Jiangyin Haida A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Fabricated Plastic & Rubber


Fortum SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Utilities , Electric Utilities


Equinaire Chemtech Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


Suprgrp SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Transportation , Misc. Transportation


Shen Ma Industry SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemicals - Plastics & Rubber


Kolonmaterial SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Textiles - Non Apparel


Seoyon Electronics SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Koss SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Audio & Video Equipment


Gazprom SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil & Gas - Integrated