×




Target Stores: Strategic Brand Alliance Exercise Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Target Stores: Strategic Brand Alliance Exercise case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Target Stores: Strategic Brand Alliance Exercise case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Alice M. Tybout. The Target Stores: Strategic Brand Alliance Exercise (referred as “Target Criteria” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Sales & Marketing. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Joint ventures.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Target Stores: Strategic Brand Alliance Exercise Case Study


This exercise asks students to develop criteria that Target Stores should use in evaluating strategic brand alliances to support its positioning as a store where you can "Expect More. Pay Less." Students are then charged with proposing a new strategic partner for Target that meets the criteria they identify. Background information about the Target "guest" and past strategic alliance is provided.


Case Authors : Alice M. Tybout

Topic : Sales & Marketing

Related Areas : Joint ventures




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Target Stores: Strategic Brand Alliance Exercise Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10017892) -10017892 - -
Year 1 3461349 -6556543 3461349 0.9434 3265424
Year 2 3979319 -2577224 7440668 0.89 3541580
Year 3 3962564 1385340 11403232 0.8396 3327045
Year 4 3233386 4618726 14636618 0.7921 2561145
TOTAL 14636618 12695193




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2677301

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Net Present Value
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Target Criteria shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Target Criteria have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Target Stores: Strategic Brand Alliance Exercise

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Sales & Marketing Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Target Criteria often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Target Criteria needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10017892) -10017892 - -
Year 1 3461349 -6556543 3461349 0.8696 3009869
Year 2 3979319 -2577224 7440668 0.7561 3008937
Year 3 3962564 1385340 11403232 0.6575 2605450
Year 4 3233386 4618726 14636618 0.5718 1848699
TOTAL 10472955


The Net NPV after 4 years is 455063

(10472955 - 10017892 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10017892) -10017892 - -
Year 1 3461349 -6556543 3461349 0.8333 2884458
Year 2 3979319 -2577224 7440668 0.6944 2763416
Year 3 3962564 1385340 11403232 0.5787 2293150
Year 4 3233386 4618726 14636618 0.4823 1559310
TOTAL 9500334


The Net NPV after 4 years is -517558

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9500334 - 10017892 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Target Criteria to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Target Criteria has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Target Criteria can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Target Criteria, then the stock price of the Target Criteria should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Target Criteria should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Target Stores: Strategic Brand Alliance Exercise

References & Further Readings

Alice M. Tybout (2018), "Target Stores: Strategic Brand Alliance Exercise Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Hangzhou Huning SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods


Allwin Telecom A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Communications Equipment


Alexandria RE SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations


Giordano Int SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Retail (Apparel)


Nk SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Security Systems & Services


Huachang Chem A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


Levi Strauss Japan KK SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Apparel/Accessories


FireEye SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming