×




Intel Corp.: Going into OverDrive Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Intel Corp.: Going into OverDrive case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Intel Corp.: Going into OverDrive case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Anirudh Dhebar. The Intel Corp.: Going into OverDrive (referred as “Overdrive Intel” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Sales & Marketing. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, IT, Marketing, Product development.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Intel Corp.: Going into OverDrive Case Study


In May 1992, Intel Corp., the leading supplier of microprocessors for IBM-compatible personal computers, announced the retail availability of OverDrive processors, a new line of performance upgrades for the Intel 486 series of microprocessors. The case chronicles the evolution of Intel microprocessors and math coprocessors. Next, it describes the genesis of the "speed-doubling" technique that is employed in the OverDrive Processor and it details the important implementation issues. The central questions are the following: How does a firm manage a product line in the context of rapid technological change? What are the consequences--for the end users, and hence the system and component manufacturers--of rapid product change? How does product upgradability help mitigate some of these consequences? How should Intel develop the OverDrive business? And how will this affect the company's mainline microprocessor business?


Case Authors : Anirudh Dhebar

Topic : Sales & Marketing

Related Areas : IT, Marketing, Product development




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Intel Corp.: Going into OverDrive Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10020531) -10020531 - -
Year 1 3455762 -6564769 3455762 0.9434 3260153
Year 2 3956443 -2608326 7412205 0.89 3521220
Year 3 3973177 1364851 11385382 0.8396 3335956
Year 4 3236991 4601842 14622373 0.7921 2564000
TOTAL 14622373 12681329




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2660798

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Payback Period
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Overdrive Intel shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Overdrive Intel have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Intel Corp.: Going into OverDrive

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Sales & Marketing Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Overdrive Intel often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Overdrive Intel needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10020531) -10020531 - -
Year 1 3455762 -6564769 3455762 0.8696 3005010
Year 2 3956443 -2608326 7412205 0.7561 2991639
Year 3 3973177 1364851 11385382 0.6575 2612428
Year 4 3236991 4601842 14622373 0.5718 1850760
TOTAL 10459838


The Net NPV after 4 years is 439307

(10459838 - 10020531 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10020531) -10020531 - -
Year 1 3455762 -6564769 3455762 0.8333 2879802
Year 2 3956443 -2608326 7412205 0.6944 2747530
Year 3 3973177 1364851 11385382 0.5787 2299292
Year 4 3236991 4601842 14622373 0.4823 1561049
TOTAL 9487673


The Net NPV after 4 years is -532858

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9487673 - 10020531 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Overdrive Intel to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Overdrive Intel has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Overdrive Intel can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Overdrive Intel, then the stock price of the Overdrive Intel should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Overdrive Intel should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Intel Corp.: Going into OverDrive

References & Further Readings

Anirudh Dhebar (2018), "Intel Corp.: Going into OverDrive Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Sanki Service SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Business Services


Kenon Holdings SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Utilities , Electric Utilities


Lanzhou Zhuangyuan Pasture SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


Softcat PLC SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Tayca Corp SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


Marubeni Corp. SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil & Gas Operations


SINOPEC Engineering SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services