×




Xerox Corp.: The Customer Satisfaction Program, Spanish Version Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Xerox Corp.: The Customer Satisfaction Program, Spanish Version case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Xerox Corp.: The Customer Satisfaction Program, Spanish Version case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Melvyn A.J. Menezes, Jon D. Serbin. The Xerox Corp.: The Customer Satisfaction Program, Spanish Version (referred as “Satisfaction Xerox” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Sales & Marketing. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Customer service, Customers.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Xerox Corp.: The Customer Satisfaction Program, Spanish Version Case Study


In August 1990 the president and executive vice president of Xerox are reviewing the progress made on its customer satisfaction program. The emphasis placed on the program, the success of the program to date, and the drive to achieve the corporate goals of customer satisfaction motivate this review. At Xerox customer satisfaction is the number one priority, ahead of return on assets (ROA) and market share. The case focuses on analyzing the strategic role of the customer satisfaction program, its goals, and the action steps for implementation. Also described are the customer satisfaction measurement system, the data analyses, and follow-up. To increase customer satisfaction and to drive the organization to higher levels of performance top management believes that Xerox should offer a satisfaction guarantee. Market research has been conducted on customer responses to four different types of guarantees. A decision has to be made regarding the type of guarantee to introduce.


Case Authors : Melvyn A.J. Menezes, Jon D. Serbin

Topic : Sales & Marketing

Related Areas : Customer service, Customers




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Xerox Corp.: The Customer Satisfaction Program, Spanish Version Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10009926) -10009926 - -
Year 1 3454017 -6555909 3454017 0.9434 3258507
Year 2 3974383 -2581526 7428400 0.89 3537187
Year 3 3942074 1360548 11370474 0.8396 3309841
Year 4 3225758 4586306 14596232 0.7921 2555102
TOTAL 14596232 12660637




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2650711

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Profitability Index
3. Payback Period
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Satisfaction Xerox shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Satisfaction Xerox have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Xerox Corp.: The Customer Satisfaction Program, Spanish Version

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Sales & Marketing Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Satisfaction Xerox often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Satisfaction Xerox needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10009926) -10009926 - -
Year 1 3454017 -6555909 3454017 0.8696 3003493
Year 2 3974383 -2581526 7428400 0.7561 3005205
Year 3 3942074 1360548 11370474 0.6575 2591978
Year 4 3225758 4586306 14596232 0.5718 1844338
TOTAL 10445013


The Net NPV after 4 years is 435087

(10445013 - 10009926 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10009926) -10009926 - -
Year 1 3454017 -6555909 3454017 0.8333 2878348
Year 2 3974383 -2581526 7428400 0.6944 2759988
Year 3 3942074 1360548 11370474 0.5787 2281293
Year 4 3225758 4586306 14596232 0.4823 1555632
TOTAL 9475260


The Net NPV after 4 years is -534666

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9475260 - 10009926 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Satisfaction Xerox to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Satisfaction Xerox has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Satisfaction Xerox can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Satisfaction Xerox, then the stock price of the Satisfaction Xerox should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Satisfaction Xerox should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Xerox Corp.: The Customer Satisfaction Program, Spanish Version

References & Further Readings

Melvyn A.J. Menezes, Jon D. Serbin (2018), "Xerox Corp.: The Customer Satisfaction Program, Spanish Version Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Sogeclair SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Aerospace & Defense


Xiwang Special Steel SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Misc. Fabricated Products


Guoxuan High-Tech SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Dutch Lady Milk SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


Kycom SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


UniCredit SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Regional Banks


Resonant Inc SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Semiconductors


TORC Oil & Gas SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil & Gas Operations


Logic Instrume SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Hardware


SendGrid SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming