×




Aquasi Marketing: Building and Managing an Online Brand Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Aquasi Marketing: Building and Managing an Online Brand case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Aquasi Marketing: Building and Managing an Online Brand case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Anagha Shukre, Amit Pundir. The Aquasi Marketing: Building and Managing an Online Brand (referred as “Aquasi Aquasi's” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Sales & Marketing. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Entrepreneurship, Globalization, Internet, Marketing.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Aquasi Marketing: Building and Managing an Online Brand Case Study


In February 2013, the senior marketing manager of Aquasi India (Private) Limited (Aquasi) met with the company's chief executive officer to consider the challenges faced by Aquasi that had arisen due to globalization after March 1997. India's competitive environment had completely changed; new technology had swept into the country and workers did not possess the essential skill sets to use the new machinery. Given sharp declines in quality and production output, Aquasi's sales suffered significantly. The number of competitors increased and began to eat into the company's market share. In the midst of these problems, Aquasi planned to develop and grow a web-based portal to manage the business in hopes that it would enable the company to move forward and survive in the difficult times ahead. However, the question remained as to how to implement this new online strategy; Aquasi's marketing and information technology teams were novices with respect to digital media, and would face several challenges. Anagha Shukre is affiliated with Indian Institute of Management Raipur.


Case Authors : Anagha Shukre, Amit Pundir

Topic : Sales & Marketing

Related Areas : Entrepreneurship, Globalization, Internet, Marketing




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Aquasi Marketing: Building and Managing an Online Brand Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10011147) -10011147 - -
Year 1 3450547 -6560600 3450547 0.9434 3255233
Year 2 3978520 -2582080 7429067 0.89 3540869
Year 3 3969424 1387344 11398491 0.8396 3332805
Year 4 3244361 4631705 14642852 0.7921 2569838
TOTAL 14642852 12698744




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2687597

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Profitability Index
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Aquasi Aquasi's shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Aquasi Aquasi's have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Aquasi Marketing: Building and Managing an Online Brand

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Sales & Marketing Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Aquasi Aquasi's often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Aquasi Aquasi's needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10011147) -10011147 - -
Year 1 3450547 -6560600 3450547 0.8696 3000476
Year 2 3978520 -2582080 7429067 0.7561 3008333
Year 3 3969424 1387344 11398491 0.6575 2609961
Year 4 3244361 4631705 14642852 0.5718 1854974
TOTAL 10473743


The Net NPV after 4 years is 462596

(10473743 - 10011147 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10011147) -10011147 - -
Year 1 3450547 -6560600 3450547 0.8333 2875456
Year 2 3978520 -2582080 7429067 0.6944 2762861
Year 3 3969424 1387344 11398491 0.5787 2297120
Year 4 3244361 4631705 14642852 0.4823 1564603
TOTAL 9500040


The Net NPV after 4 years is -511107

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9500040 - 10011147 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Aquasi Aquasi's to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Aquasi Aquasi's has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Aquasi Aquasi's can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Aquasi Aquasi's, then the stock price of the Aquasi Aquasi's should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Aquasi Aquasi's should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Aquasi Marketing: Building and Managing an Online Brand

References & Further Readings

Anagha Shukre, Amit Pundir (2018), "Aquasi Marketing: Building and Managing an Online Brand Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Jiangxi Fushine Pharma SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Siti Networks SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Broadcasting & Cable TV


K+S AG SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Non-Metallic Mining


Strategic Elements Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


Avvaa World Hlthcr SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Healthcare Facilities


Foshan Electrical Lighting SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Huadian Energy SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Utilities , Electric Utilities


Display Tech SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Regina Miracle Intl SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Apparel/Accessories


Bastide Le Confort SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Medical Equipment & Supplies