×




Jane's Short & Sweet: Purpose, People, and Profit Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Jane's Short & Sweet: Purpose, People, and Profit case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Jane's Short & Sweet: Purpose, People, and Profit case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Kelly Ann Irvin, Mary Conway Dato-on. The Jane's Short & Sweet: Purpose, People, and Profit (referred as “Jane's Sweet” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Sales & Marketing. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Marketing, Pricing, Social enterprise, Sustainability.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Jane's Short & Sweet: Purpose, People, and Profit Case Study


In 2015, jane's short & sweet, a United States-based for-profit business, regularly dedicated 25 per cent of its revenue to charities supporting its mission of improving the education and healthcare of marginalized women. The company also engaged in some environmental practices with respect to its use of resources. jane's short & sweet's owner understood that she would have to make some trade-offs between people and profit while still attempting to remain consistent with her company's social purpose and contribute to the resolution of its current problem-finding a way to fill a customer order that exceeded the company's production capacity. While addressing the company's new labour needs, the owner needed to evaluate how the trade-off between mission and money would affect the company's labour source, hourly wages, pricing strategy, product price, and organizational goals. To do so, the owner had to identify and evaluate the options that would enable her to better fulfill her company's role as a social sustainable enterprise. Kelly Ann Irvin is affiliated with Rollins College. Mary Conway Dato-on is affiliated with Rollins College.


Case Authors : Kelly Ann Irvin, Mary Conway Dato-on

Topic : Sales & Marketing

Related Areas : Marketing, Pricing, Social enterprise, Sustainability




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Jane's Short & Sweet: Purpose, People, and Profit Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10019747) -10019747 - -
Year 1 3443726 -6576021 3443726 0.9434 3248798
Year 2 3980632 -2595389 7424358 0.89 3542748
Year 3 3967022 1371633 11391380 0.8396 3330788
Year 4 3228579 4600212 14619959 0.7921 2557337
TOTAL 14619959 12679672




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2659925

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Profitability Index
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Jane's Sweet shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Jane's Sweet have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Jane's Short & Sweet: Purpose, People, and Profit

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Sales & Marketing Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Jane's Sweet often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Jane's Sweet needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10019747) -10019747 - -
Year 1 3443726 -6576021 3443726 0.8696 2994544
Year 2 3980632 -2595389 7424358 0.7561 3009930
Year 3 3967022 1371633 11391380 0.6575 2608381
Year 4 3228579 4600212 14619959 0.5718 1845951
TOTAL 10458806


The Net NPV after 4 years is 439059

(10458806 - 10019747 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10019747) -10019747 - -
Year 1 3443726 -6576021 3443726 0.8333 2869772
Year 2 3980632 -2595389 7424358 0.6944 2764328
Year 3 3967022 1371633 11391380 0.5787 2295730
Year 4 3228579 4600212 14619959 0.4823 1556992
TOTAL 9486822


The Net NPV after 4 years is -532925

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9486822 - 10019747 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Jane's Sweet to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Jane's Sweet has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Jane's Sweet can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Jane's Sweet, then the stock price of the Jane's Sweet should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Jane's Sweet should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Jane's Short & Sweet: Purpose, People, and Profit

References & Further Readings

Kelly Ann Irvin, Mary Conway Dato-on (2018), "Jane's Short & Sweet: Purpose, People, and Profit Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Aberdeen Israel SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


Wenzhou Hongfeng Electrical Alloy SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Race Oncology SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Shanghai Zhongji SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Elecosoft SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


IBM SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Services


Ihq SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Recreational Activities


Signature Int SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Constr. - Supplies & Fixtures


Espial Group Inc. SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Asiaplast Industries SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Fabricated Plastic & Rubber