×




Konica Minolta Business Solutions: A Professional Approach to Selling (C) Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Konica Minolta Business Solutions: A Professional Approach to Selling (C) case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Konica Minolta Business Solutions: A Professional Approach to Selling (C) case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Prabakar Kothandaraman, Sudha Mani, William J. Healy. The Konica Minolta Business Solutions: A Professional Approach to Selling (C) (referred as “Kmbs Swanson” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Sales & Marketing. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Manufacturing, Sales, Technology.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Konica Minolta Business Solutions: A Professional Approach to Selling (C) Case Study


Supplement to case NA0405. Konica Minolta Business Solutions (KMBS) was a leader in advanced document management technologies. Its business solutions were grouped under office systems, print production, and printers. Its business solutions were grouped under office systems, print production, and printers. Peter Daniel, Branch Manager for northern New Jersey at KMBS, recently assigned Bill Swanson to be the sales rep responsible for Bergen and Passaic counties in New Jersey. Swanson was assigned the responsibility of winning an important account away from competitors, namely, NYCG, a large global accounting and consulting firm in Wayne, New Jersey. Swanson had to draft a plan to gather information from the prospect. The sales process can be classified into three key phases: prospecting, needs identification, and proposing a solution and closing the deal. The KMBS cases (A), (B), and (C) primarily focus on needs identification. In KMBS(A), Swanson had to develop the plan of action for planning, preparing, and approaching NYCG. In KMBS(B), Swanson met with the Global Procurement Director at NYCG, Bob Benedict, to understand NYCG's needs. He also met with Peter Daniel to discuss how they should continue to identify NYCG's needs. Finally, in KMBS(C), Swanson met with the heads of the Distributed Print Services and Central Print Services divisions, as well as other users at NYCG, to understand their needs. These efforts should help KMBS create a custom solution for NYCG. Swanson and Daniel thus must decide which solutions to present to NYCG.


Case Authors : Prabakar Kothandaraman, Sudha Mani, William J. Healy

Topic : Sales & Marketing

Related Areas : Manufacturing, Sales, Technology




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Konica Minolta Business Solutions: A Professional Approach to Selling (C) Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10012243) -10012243 - -
Year 1 3445220 -6567023 3445220 0.9434 3250208
Year 2 3976330 -2590693 7421550 0.89 3538920
Year 3 3968858 1378165 11390408 0.8396 3332330
Year 4 3228841 4607006 14619249 0.7921 2557544
TOTAL 14619249 12679001




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2666758

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Payback Period
3. Net Present Value
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Kmbs Swanson shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Kmbs Swanson have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Konica Minolta Business Solutions: A Professional Approach to Selling (C)

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Sales & Marketing Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Kmbs Swanson often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Kmbs Swanson needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10012243) -10012243 - -
Year 1 3445220 -6567023 3445220 0.8696 2995843
Year 2 3976330 -2590693 7421550 0.7561 3006677
Year 3 3968858 1378165 11390408 0.6575 2609589
Year 4 3228841 4607006 14619249 0.5718 1846100
TOTAL 10458209


The Net NPV after 4 years is 445966

(10458209 - 10012243 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10012243) -10012243 - -
Year 1 3445220 -6567023 3445220 0.8333 2871017
Year 2 3976330 -2590693 7421550 0.6944 2761340
Year 3 3968858 1378165 11390408 0.5787 2296793
Year 4 3228841 4607006 14619249 0.4823 1557119
TOTAL 9486268


The Net NPV after 4 years is -525975

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9486268 - 10012243 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Kmbs Swanson to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Kmbs Swanson has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Kmbs Swanson can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Kmbs Swanson, then the stock price of the Kmbs Swanson should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Kmbs Swanson should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Konica Minolta Business Solutions: A Professional Approach to Selling (C)

References & Further Readings

Prabakar Kothandaraman, Sudha Mani, William J. Healy (2018), "Konica Minolta Business Solutions: A Professional Approach to Selling (C) Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Koa Corp SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Tech Trans SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Misc. Fabricated Products


Sz Hongtao A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


LOJAS AMERIC PN SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Retail (Department & Discount)


Cobalt Power SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


Yindu Kitchen SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Appliance & Tool


Lacroix SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Neptune Co SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming