×




Star Cablevision Group (F): Lessons Learned Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Star Cablevision Group (F): Lessons Learned case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Star Cablevision Group (F): Lessons Learned case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by William A. Sahlman, Burton C. Hurlock. The Star Cablevision Group (F): Lessons Learned (referred as “Learned Lessons” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Finance & Accounting. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Reorganization.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Star Cablevision Group (F): Lessons Learned Case Study


Last case in a series of six cases. This case describes the company as it reflects back to lessons learned.


Case Authors : William A. Sahlman, Burton C. Hurlock

Topic : Finance & Accounting

Related Areas : Reorganization




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Star Cablevision Group (F): Lessons Learned Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10029969) -10029969 - -
Year 1 3465880 -6564089 3465880 0.9434 3269698
Year 2 3969929 -2594160 7435809 0.89 3533223
Year 3 3956457 1362297 11392266 0.8396 3321918
Year 4 3231042 4593339 14623308 0.7921 2559288
TOTAL 14623308 12684126




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2654157

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Profitability Index
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Net Present Value

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Learned Lessons have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Learned Lessons shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Star Cablevision Group (F): Lessons Learned

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Finance & Accounting Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Learned Lessons often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Learned Lessons needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10029969) -10029969 - -
Year 1 3465880 -6564089 3465880 0.8696 3013809
Year 2 3969929 -2594160 7435809 0.7561 3001837
Year 3 3956457 1362297 11392266 0.6575 2601435
Year 4 3231042 4593339 14623308 0.5718 1847359
TOTAL 10464439


The Net NPV after 4 years is 434470

(10464439 - 10029969 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10029969) -10029969 - -
Year 1 3465880 -6564089 3465880 0.8333 2888233
Year 2 3969929 -2594160 7435809 0.6944 2756895
Year 3 3956457 1362297 11392266 0.5787 2289616
Year 4 3231042 4593339 14623308 0.4823 1558180
TOTAL 9492925


The Net NPV after 4 years is -537044

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9492925 - 10029969 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Learned Lessons to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Learned Lessons has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Learned Lessons can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Learned Lessons, then the stock price of the Learned Lessons should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Learned Lessons should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Star Cablevision Group (F): Lessons Learned

References & Further Readings

William A. Sahlman, Burton C. Hurlock (2018), "Star Cablevision Group (F): Lessons Learned Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Jalco SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations


Land General SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Adtec Plasma Tech SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Faes Farma SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Xiamen Airport SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Transportation , Misc. Transportation


Eland SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil & Gas - Integrated


TKC Corp SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming