×




Moonka Auto: Recruiting Salespeople Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Moonka Auto: Recruiting Salespeople case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Moonka Auto: Recruiting Salespeople case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Atul Arun Pathak, Gyanesh Mishra. The Moonka Auto: Recruiting Salespeople (referred as “Moonka Salespersons” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Sales & Marketing. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, International business, Marketing, Talent management.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Moonka Auto: Recruiting Salespeople Case Study


In April 2016, the owner of Moonka Automobile, a two-wheeled vehicle dealership for Honda Motor Company Ltd., was facing some difficult decisions regarding recruitment for Moonka Automobile's new branch in Jamshedpur, India. The owner wanted to improve the process for recruiting salespersons for this second branch. In addition to the constraints of a tight budget, limited managerial time and availability, and the need to complete the recruitment quickly, the owner's challenges included (1) identifying the knowledge, skills, and attitude he needed to look for in potential salespersons; (2) encouraging the appropriate candidates to apply for the job opening; and (3) improving the process to be followed for recruitment. The owner certainly did not want to rush things and end up recruiting unsuitable employees, which could have disastrous consequences for the business. At the same time, he needed to get sales underway in the new branch. How could the owner balance his many responsibilities while finding the right salespersons for Moonka Automobile? Atul Arun Pathak is affiliated with XLRI-Xavier School of Management. Gyanesh Mishra is affiliated with XLRI-Xavier School of Management.


Case Authors : Atul Arun Pathak, Gyanesh Mishra

Topic : Sales & Marketing

Related Areas : International business, Marketing, Talent management




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Moonka Auto: Recruiting Salespeople Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10014665) -10014665 - -
Year 1 3451422 -6563243 3451422 0.9434 3256058
Year 2 3957724 -2605519 7409146 0.89 3522360
Year 3 3953500 1347981 11362646 0.8396 3319435
Year 4 3245197 4593178 14607843 0.7921 2570500
TOTAL 14607843 12668354




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2653689

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Payback Period
3. Net Present Value
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Moonka Salespersons have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Moonka Salespersons shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Moonka Auto: Recruiting Salespeople

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Sales & Marketing Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Moonka Salespersons often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Moonka Salespersons needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10014665) -10014665 - -
Year 1 3451422 -6563243 3451422 0.8696 3001237
Year 2 3957724 -2605519 7409146 0.7561 2992608
Year 3 3953500 1347981 11362646 0.6575 2599490
Year 4 3245197 4593178 14607843 0.5718 1855452
TOTAL 10448787


The Net NPV after 4 years is 434122

(10448787 - 10014665 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10014665) -10014665 - -
Year 1 3451422 -6563243 3451422 0.8333 2876185
Year 2 3957724 -2605519 7409146 0.6944 2748419
Year 3 3953500 1347981 11362646 0.5787 2287905
Year 4 3245197 4593178 14607843 0.4823 1565006
TOTAL 9477516


The Net NPV after 4 years is -537149

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9477516 - 10014665 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Moonka Salespersons to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Moonka Salespersons has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Moonka Salespersons can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Moonka Salespersons, then the stock price of the Moonka Salespersons should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Moonka Salespersons should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Moonka Auto: Recruiting Salespeople

References & Further Readings

Atul Arun Pathak, Gyanesh Mishra (2018), "Moonka Auto: Recruiting Salespeople Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Lowland SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


Seoul Pharma SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Radiant Creations SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Personal & Household Prods.


Aucma SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Appliance & Tool


Fonfun SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Services


Dongguan Kingsun Optoelectron A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Furniture & Fixtures


RMR Real Estate SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


FUJIFILM Holdings Corp SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Medical Equipment & Supplies


Kemira Oyj SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing