×




Matt Coffin Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Matt Coffin case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Matt Coffin case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by William Bygrave, Carl Hedberg. The Matt Coffin (referred as “Matt Lowermybills” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Sales & Marketing. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Internet, Marketing, Sustainability.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Matt Coffin Case Study


Matt Coffin is in the money, to say the least. His company, LowerMyBills, is worth in excess of $400 million. But should he sell? Is he crazy to be thinking that life is good as is; why risk changing all that with a harvest? Ever since he began starting businesses, Matt Coffin's primary motivation was to create something big enough and exciting enough to draw in the best and the brightest. His two earlier ventures were profitable, but he tossed them aside the moment he saw they weren't 'amazing' opportunities. At the peak of the Internet wave in 1999, the 30 year-old entrepreneur hit upon his first big opportunity: a Web business to help consumers lower their monthly household bills. He put together a first round of investment from friends and a professional investor group and launched LowerMyBills.com. It grows rapidly, but when the Internet bubble bursts, Matt nearly goes under because his bank demands repayment of its credit line in full. Fortunately, unlike most other dot-com entrepreneurs at that time, Matt has been frugal and has focused on profitability. The company puts together a second round of financing, grows rapidly, and turns profitable in 2002. In 2005, Matt is inundated with offers to take LowerMyBills.com public, to refinance the company with a partial buyout, or to have LowerMyBills acquired by a billion dollar parent. He loves the life and work environment he's created, so what should he do?


Case Authors : William Bygrave, Carl Hedberg

Topic : Sales & Marketing

Related Areas : Internet, Marketing, Sustainability




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Matt Coffin Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10020938) -10020938 - -
Year 1 3472625 -6548313 3472625 0.9434 3276061
Year 2 3979084 -2569229 7451709 0.89 3541371
Year 3 3974642 1405413 11426351 0.8396 3337186
Year 4 3243960 4649373 14670311 0.7921 2569520
TOTAL 14670311 12724138




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2703200

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Net Present Value
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Matt Lowermybills have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Matt Lowermybills shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Matt Coffin

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Sales & Marketing Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Matt Lowermybills often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Matt Lowermybills needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10020938) -10020938 - -
Year 1 3472625 -6548313 3472625 0.8696 3019674
Year 2 3979084 -2569229 7451709 0.7561 3008759
Year 3 3974642 1405413 11426351 0.6575 2613392
Year 4 3243960 4649373 14670311 0.5718 1854745
TOTAL 10496569


The Net NPV after 4 years is 475631

(10496569 - 10020938 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10020938) -10020938 - -
Year 1 3472625 -6548313 3472625 0.8333 2893854
Year 2 3979084 -2569229 7451709 0.6944 2763253
Year 3 3974642 1405413 11426351 0.5787 2300140
Year 4 3243960 4649373 14670311 0.4823 1564410
TOTAL 9521657


The Net NPV after 4 years is -499281

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9521657 - 10020938 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Matt Lowermybills to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Matt Lowermybills has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Matt Lowermybills can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Matt Lowermybills, then the stock price of the Matt Lowermybills should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Matt Lowermybills should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Matt Coffin

References & Further Readings

William Bygrave, Carl Hedberg (2018), "Matt Coffin Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Alpa Laboratories Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Gafisa ADR SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Mirrabooka Investments SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


Crymson SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Apparel/Accessories


Telecom Italia SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Communications Services


China Mer Hold SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Transportation , Misc. Transportation


Zhuhai Hokai Med Instruments SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Medical Equipment & Supplies


Eupe Corp SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services