Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?
At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. The High Price of Customer Satisfaction case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Timothy Keiningham, Sunil Gupta, Lerzan Aksoy, Alexander Buoye. The The High Price of Customer Satisfaction (referred as “Satisfaction Customer” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Sales & Marketing. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Marketing.
The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.
This is an MIT Sloan Management Review article. "Satisfaction guaranteed or your money back"is a business promise made to consumers since 1875, when Montgomery Ward used it to differentiate his mail order catalog. It is now a vow many businesses make. However, the correlation between increasing customer satisfaction and increasing customer spending with your company is very weak, according to the authors. Their research finds that changes in customers'satisfaction levels explain less than 1% of variation in a company's share of category spending.Is customer satisfaction worth the cost? To find out, the authors investigated the relationship between customer satisfaction and business outcomes, gathering data from more than 100,000 consumers covering more than 300 brands. Although high customer satisfaction ratings are typically treated by managers as being universally good for business, the authors'findings indicate that the benefits are not nearly so clear-cut. There is a downside to continuously devoting resources to raise customer satisfaction levels. Managers are rarely able to accurately quantify the cost associated with increasing customer satisfaction scores (for example, from 8.7 to 9.1 on a 10-point scale), nor are they able to determine precisely what such an increase is actually worth. It turns out the return on these investments is often trivial or even negative. Knowing a customer's satisfaction level tells you little about how he or she will divide his or her spending among the different brands used. As a result, changes in customer satisfaction levels are unlikely to have a meaningful impact on the share of category spending customers allocate with your brand. Why? Single-brand loyalty, which was common in our parents'and grandparents'generations, has been replaced with loyalty to multiple brands in a category in many sectors. Because of this divided loyalty, more customers partially defect (in other words, they give more of their business to a competitor) than completely defect from a business or brand. As a result, improving customers'share of spending with your brand tends to represent a far greater opportunity than efforts to improve customer retention. kThe measure that really matters, according to the authors, isn't your percentage of delighted customers or promoters. What matters is the relative "rank"that your brand's satisfaction level represents vis-A?vis your competitors.
| Years | Cash Flow | Net Cash Flow | Cumulative Cash Flow |
Discount Rate @ 6 % |
Discounted Cash Flows |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year 0 | (10014842) | -10014842 | - | - | |
| Year 1 | 3468914 | -6545928 | 3468914 | 0.9434 | 3272560 |
| Year 2 | 3966489 | -2579439 | 7435403 | 0.89 | 3530161 |
| Year 3 | 3944850 | 1365411 | 11380253 | 0.8396 | 3312172 |
| Year 4 | 3236052 | 4601463 | 14616305 | 0.7921 | 2563256 |
| TOTAL | 14616305 | 12678150 |
In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -
Capital Budgeting Approaches
There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –
1. Profitability Index
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Net Present Value
4. Payback Period
Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on
Discounted Cash Flow
technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.
Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –
1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Satisfaction Customer have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Satisfaction Customer shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0
Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate.
Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.
Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project
In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Satisfaction Customer often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.
To overcome such scenarios managers at Satisfaction Customer needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.
After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.
| Years | Cash Flow | Net Cash Flow | Cumulative Cash Flow |
Discount Rate @ 15 % |
Discounted Cash Flows |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year 0 | (10014842) | -10014842 | - | - | |
| Year 1 | 3468914 | -6545928 | 3468914 | 0.8696 | 3016447 |
| Year 2 | 3966489 | -2579439 | 7435403 | 0.7561 | 2999236 |
| Year 3 | 3944850 | 1365411 | 11380253 | 0.6575 | 2593803 |
| Year 4 | 3236052 | 4601463 | 14616305 | 0.5718 | 1850223 |
| TOTAL | 10459709 |
(10459709 - 10014842 )
If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.
| Years | Cash Flow | Net Cash Flow | Cumulative Cash Flow |
Discount Rate @ 20 % |
Discounted Cash Flows |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year 0 | (10014842) | -10014842 | - | - | |
| Year 1 | 3468914 | -6545928 | 3468914 | 0.8333 | 2890762 |
| Year 2 | 3966489 | -2579439 | 7435403 | 0.6944 | 2754506 |
| Year 3 | 3944850 | 1365411 | 11380253 | 0.5787 | 2282899 |
| Year 4 | 3236052 | 4601463 | 14616305 | 0.4823 | 1560596 |
| TOTAL | 9488763 |
At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9488763 - 10014842 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Satisfaction Customer to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.
Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Satisfaction Customer has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Satisfaction Customer can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.
In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Satisfaction Customer, then the stock price of the Satisfaction Customer should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.
In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.
Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Satisfaction Customer should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –
What can impact the cash flow of the project.
What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.
Understanding of risks involved in the project.
What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.
What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.
Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.
Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.
Timothy Keiningham, Sunil Gupta, Lerzan Aksoy, Alexander Buoye (2018), "The High Price of Customer Satisfaction Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.
Feel free to connect with us if you need business research.
You can download Excel Template of Case Study Solution & Analysis of The High Price of Customer Satisfaction
Consumer Cyclical , Audio & Video Equipment
Capital Goods , Aerospace & Defense
Technology , Software & Programming
Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods
Financial , Insurance (Prop. & Casualty)
Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Parts
Healthcare , Major Drugs
Energy , Oil & Gas - Integrated
Services , Retail (Grocery)
Energy , Oil & Gas Operations
