×




Attractors: Building Mountains in the Flat Landscape of the World Wide Web Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Attractors: Building Mountains in the Flat Landscape of the World Wide Web case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Attractors: Building Mountains in the Flat Landscape of the World Wide Web case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Richard T. Watson, Sigmund Akselsen, Leyland Pitt. The Attractors: Building Mountains in the Flat Landscape of the World Wide Web (referred as “Attractors Web” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Sales & Marketing. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Internet, IT.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Attractors: Building Mountains in the Flat Landscape of the World Wide Web Case Study


Advocates of the World Wide Web claim it is a great leveler and that participants have a more equal voice. This flatness of the Web creates a major challenge for many businesses: How do you attract visitors and prospective customers to the firm's Web site? The Web site that can attract more visitors, all other things being equal, is more likely to communicate its message to a wider audience or sell its product to more people. Organizations want to build mountains--or "attractors"--in the otherwise flat landscape of Web-based marketing and advertising. This article classifies existing approaches to creating attractors, identifies four basic types of attractors, and predicts that there will be a move toward creating highly interactive attractors as a device for mass customization. The article also addresses the notion of sustainable attractiveness and presents recommendations for designing an attractor.


Case Authors : Richard T. Watson, Sigmund Akselsen, Leyland Pitt

Topic : Sales & Marketing

Related Areas : Internet, IT




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Attractors: Building Mountains in the Flat Landscape of the World Wide Web Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10001849) -10001849 - -
Year 1 3456132 -6545717 3456132 0.9434 3260502
Year 2 3965407 -2580310 7421539 0.89 3529198
Year 3 3968609 1388299 11390148 0.8396 3332121
Year 4 3249559 4637858 14639707 0.7921 2573955
TOTAL 14639707 12695776




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2693927

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Net Present Value
2. Payback Period
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Attractors Web have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Attractors Web shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Attractors: Building Mountains in the Flat Landscape of the World Wide Web

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Sales & Marketing Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Attractors Web often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Attractors Web needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10001849) -10001849 - -
Year 1 3456132 -6545717 3456132 0.8696 3005332
Year 2 3965407 -2580310 7421539 0.7561 2998417
Year 3 3968609 1388299 11390148 0.6575 2609425
Year 4 3249559 4637858 14639707 0.5718 1857946
TOTAL 10471120


The Net NPV after 4 years is 469271

(10471120 - 10001849 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10001849) -10001849 - -
Year 1 3456132 -6545717 3456132 0.8333 2880110
Year 2 3965407 -2580310 7421539 0.6944 2753755
Year 3 3968609 1388299 11390148 0.5787 2296649
Year 4 3249559 4637858 14639707 0.4823 1567110
TOTAL 9497623


The Net NPV after 4 years is -504226

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9497623 - 10001849 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Attractors Web to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Attractors Web has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Attractors Web can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Attractors Web, then the stock price of the Attractors Web should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Attractors Web should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Attractors: Building Mountains in the Flat Landscape of the World Wide Web

References & Further Readings

Richard T. Watson, Sigmund Akselsen, Leyland Pitt (2018), "Attractors: Building Mountains in the Flat Landscape of the World Wide Web Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


GD Power Dev SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Utilities , Electric Utilities


Zhejiang Langdi SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Misc. Capital Goods


Schaeffler India SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Misc. Fabricated Products


Orchids Paper SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Paper & Paper Products


Trek Metals SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Gold & Silver


FreeSeas SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Transportation , Water Transportation


SIOS Tech SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Gemgrow Properties B SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Real Estate Operations