×




Attractors: Building Mountains in the Flat Landscape of the World Wide Web Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Attractors: Building Mountains in the Flat Landscape of the World Wide Web case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Attractors: Building Mountains in the Flat Landscape of the World Wide Web case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Richard T. Watson, Sigmund Akselsen, Leyland Pitt. The Attractors: Building Mountains in the Flat Landscape of the World Wide Web (referred as “Attractors Web” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Sales & Marketing. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Internet, IT.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Attractors: Building Mountains in the Flat Landscape of the World Wide Web Case Study


Advocates of the World Wide Web claim it is a great leveler and that participants have a more equal voice. This flatness of the Web creates a major challenge for many businesses: How do you attract visitors and prospective customers to the firm's Web site? The Web site that can attract more visitors, all other things being equal, is more likely to communicate its message to a wider audience or sell its product to more people. Organizations want to build mountains--or "attractors"--in the otherwise flat landscape of Web-based marketing and advertising. This article classifies existing approaches to creating attractors, identifies four basic types of attractors, and predicts that there will be a move toward creating highly interactive attractors as a device for mass customization. The article also addresses the notion of sustainable attractiveness and presents recommendations for designing an attractor.


Case Authors : Richard T. Watson, Sigmund Akselsen, Leyland Pitt

Topic : Sales & Marketing

Related Areas : Internet, IT




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Attractors: Building Mountains in the Flat Landscape of the World Wide Web Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10016451) -10016451 - -
Year 1 3453822 -6562629 3453822 0.9434 3258323
Year 2 3972945 -2589684 7426767 0.89 3535907
Year 3 3952193 1362509 11378960 0.8396 3318337
Year 4 3246309 4608818 14625269 0.7921 2571381
TOTAL 14625269 12683948




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2667497

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Internal Rate of Return
3. Net Present Value
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Attractors Web have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Attractors Web shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Attractors: Building Mountains in the Flat Landscape of the World Wide Web

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Sales & Marketing Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Attractors Web often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Attractors Web needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10016451) -10016451 - -
Year 1 3453822 -6562629 3453822 0.8696 3003323
Year 2 3972945 -2589684 7426767 0.7561 3004117
Year 3 3952193 1362509 11378960 0.6575 2598631
Year 4 3246309 4608818 14625269 0.5718 1856088
TOTAL 10462159


The Net NPV after 4 years is 445708

(10462159 - 10016451 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10016451) -10016451 - -
Year 1 3453822 -6562629 3453822 0.8333 2878185
Year 2 3972945 -2589684 7426767 0.6944 2758990
Year 3 3952193 1362509 11378960 0.5787 2287149
Year 4 3246309 4608818 14625269 0.4823 1565543
TOTAL 9489866


The Net NPV after 4 years is -526585

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9489866 - 10016451 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Attractors Web to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Attractors Web has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Attractors Web can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Attractors Web, then the stock price of the Attractors Web should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Attractors Web should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Attractors: Building Mountains in the Flat Landscape of the World Wide Web

References & Further Readings

Richard T. Watson, Sigmund Akselsen, Leyland Pitt (2018), "Attractors: Building Mountains in the Flat Landscape of the World Wide Web Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


China Shengmu Organic Milk SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing


ARQ SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Services


Chuetsu Pulp Paper SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Paper & Paper Products


SafeCharge Intl Group SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Consumer Financial Services


Euroseas SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Transportation , Water Transportation


China XD Electric SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Codexis SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Chemical Manufacturing


Harbin Pharm SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Cameco SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Metal Mining


Alltronics SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls