Stanford University: Implementing FASB Statements 116 and 117 Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Stanford University: Implementing FASB Statements 116 and 117 case study

At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Stanford University: Implementing FASB Statements 116 and 117 case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Christopher Canellos, David W. Hoyt. The Stanford University: Implementing FASB Statements 116 and 117 (referred as “116 117” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Finance & Accounting. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Financial management.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment

---

Case Description of Stanford University: Implementing FASB Statements 116 and 117 Case Study

In 1993, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued two statements--Number 116: Accounting for Contributions Received and Contributions Made and Number 117: Financial Statements of Not-for-Profit Organizations. These statements required significant changes to the financial statements issued by nonprofit organizations. This case discusses changes in the context of Stanford University, a private, not-for-profit educational institution. Discusses financial reporting prior to FAS 116 and 117, the objectives of FAS 116 and 117, and their implementation by Stanford. Prepares students for a discussion of nonprofit financial reporting, fund accounting, donor-imposed restrictions, the various stakeholders, and the advantages or disadvantages of financial statements prepared under the provisions of FAS 116 and 117.

Case Authors : Christopher Canellos, David W. Hoyt

Topic : Finance & Accounting

Related Areas : Financial management

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Stanford University: Implementing FASB Statements 116 and 117 Case Study

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 6 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10025142)	-10025142	-	-
Year 1	3449298	-6575844	3449298	0.9434	3254055
Year 2	3974103	-2601741	7423401	0.89	3536938
Year 3	3973515	1371774	11396916	0.8396	3336240
Year 4	3244939	4616713	14641855	0.7921	2570296
TOTAL			14641855		12697528

The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2672386

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting

What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.

---

Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting

There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Profitability Index
2. Payback Period
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Net Present Value

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. 116 117 shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of 116 117 have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.

---

Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Stanford University: Implementing FASB Statements 116 and 117

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Finance & Accounting Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at 116 117 often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at 116 117 needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 15 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10025142)	-10025142	-	-
Year 1	3449298	-6575844	3449298	0.8696	2999390
Year 2	3974103	-2601741	7423401	0.7561	3004993
Year 3	3973515	1371774	11396916	0.6575	2612651
Year 4	3244939	4616713	14641855	0.5718	1855304
TOTAL					10472337

The Net NPV after 4 years is 447195

(10472337 - 10025142 )

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%

If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 20 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10025142)	-10025142	-	-
Year 1	3449298	-6575844	3449298	0.8333	2874415
Year 2	3974103	-2601741	7423401	0.6944	2759794
Year 3	3973515	1371774	11396916	0.5787	2299488
Year 4	3244939	4616713	14641855	0.4823	1564882
TOTAL					9498578

The Net NPV after 4 years is -526564

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9498578 - 10025142 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of 116 117 to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.

Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of 116 117 has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at 116 117 can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at 116 117, then the stock price of the 116 117 should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at 116 117 should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.

---

Negotiation Strategy of Stanford University: Implementing FASB Statements 116 and 117

References & Further Readings

Christopher Canellos, David W. Hoyt (2018), "Stanford University: Implementing FASB Statements 116 and 117 Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.