×




Rossin Greenberg Seronick & Hill, Inc. (B) Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Rossin Greenberg Seronick & Hill, Inc. (B) case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Rossin Greenberg Seronick & Hill, Inc. (B) case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by John A. Quelch, N. Craig Smith. The Rossin Greenberg Seronick & Hill, Inc. (B) (referred as “Greenberg Rossin” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Sales & Marketing. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Marketing, Sales.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Rossin Greenberg Seronick & Hill, Inc. (B) Case Study


Teaching objectives: 1) to show how aggressive marketing can lead to allegations of misconduct, 2) to consider responses under crisis management, and 3) to explore the importance of credibility within marketing communications.


Case Authors : John A. Quelch, N. Craig Smith

Topic : Sales & Marketing

Related Areas : Marketing, Sales




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Rossin Greenberg Seronick & Hill, Inc. (B) Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10006856) -10006856 - -
Year 1 3466876 -6539980 3466876 0.9434 3270638
Year 2 3958296 -2581684 7425172 0.89 3522869
Year 3 3959080 1377396 11384252 0.8396 3324120
Year 4 3237563 4614959 14621815 0.7921 2564453
TOTAL 14621815 12682080




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2675224

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Profitability Index
3. Net Present Value
4. Internal Rate of Return

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Greenberg Rossin have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Greenberg Rossin shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Rossin Greenberg Seronick & Hill, Inc. (B)

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Sales & Marketing Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Greenberg Rossin often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Greenberg Rossin needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10006856) -10006856 - -
Year 1 3466876 -6539980 3466876 0.8696 3014675
Year 2 3958296 -2581684 7425172 0.7561 2993040
Year 3 3959080 1377396 11384252 0.6575 2603159
Year 4 3237563 4614959 14621815 0.5718 1851087
TOTAL 10461962


The Net NPV after 4 years is 455106

(10461962 - 10006856 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10006856) -10006856 - -
Year 1 3466876 -6539980 3466876 0.8333 2889063
Year 2 3958296 -2581684 7425172 0.6944 2748817
Year 3 3959080 1377396 11384252 0.5787 2291134
Year 4 3237563 4614959 14621815 0.4823 1561325
TOTAL 9490339


The Net NPV after 4 years is -516517

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9490339 - 10006856 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Greenberg Rossin to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Greenberg Rossin has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Greenberg Rossin can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Greenberg Rossin, then the stock price of the Greenberg Rossin should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Greenberg Rossin should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Rossin Greenberg Seronick & Hill, Inc. (B)

References & Further Readings

John A. Quelch, N. Craig Smith (2018), "Rossin Greenberg Seronick & Hill, Inc. (B) Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Amazon.com SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Retail (Catalog & Mail Order)


Hazama Ando Corp SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Ckd Bio SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Intl Container A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Manufacturers


Pacific Basin Shipping SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Transportation , Water Transportation


Cookpad Inc SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Services


SMC Corp SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Scientific & Technical Instr.


Beijing Tiantan Bio SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Quest Solution SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Services