×




Using "Biztainment" to Gain Competitive Advantage Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Using "Biztainment" to Gain Competitive Advantage case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Using "Biztainment" to Gain Competitive Advantage case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Mi Kyong Newsom, David A. Collier, Eric Olsen. The Using "Biztainment" to Gain Competitive Advantage (referred as “Biztainment Bear” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Sales & Marketing. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Marketing, Organizational structure.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Using "Biztainment" to Gain Competitive Advantage Case Study


Biztainment is a practice by which entertainment is added to a bundle of goods and services, in order to gain competitive advantage. The achievement of this goal is illustrated herein using economic examples of increased revenue, repeat business, and profits, and by extending the product lifecycle, thus ensuring survival of the firm. The general premise is that biztainment is an increasingly popular business strategy, applicable to all industries. For example, consider the goods and services provided by Build-A-Bear stores: children can select the fabric, eyes, and buttons to create a unique tangible good, while the memorable process of building it (employing self-service, too) with family or friends adds extraordinary value to the purchase. Build-A-Bear's use of biztainment has resulted in 370 stores worldwide on five continents, expanding at a rate of 25 locations per year, and earned revenue of $474 million in 2007 (Build-A-Bear, 2008). This article concludes by offering examples of ways in which managers can evaluate their current product-service strategies against the environmental drivers of biztainment.


Case Authors : Mi Kyong Newsom, David A. Collier, Eric Olsen

Topic : Sales & Marketing

Related Areas : Marketing, Organizational structure




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Using "Biztainment" to Gain Competitive Advantage Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10011432) -10011432 - -
Year 1 3460262 -6551170 3460262 0.9434 3264398
Year 2 3968611 -2582559 7428873 0.89 3532050
Year 3 3946109 1363550 11374982 0.8396 3313229
Year 4 3223798 4587348 14598780 0.7921 2553550
TOTAL 14598780 12663227




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2651795

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Payback Period
3. Net Present Value
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Biztainment Bear shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Biztainment Bear have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Using "Biztainment" to Gain Competitive Advantage

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Sales & Marketing Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Biztainment Bear often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Biztainment Bear needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10011432) -10011432 - -
Year 1 3460262 -6551170 3460262 0.8696 3008923
Year 2 3968611 -2582559 7428873 0.7561 3000840
Year 3 3946109 1363550 11374982 0.6575 2594631
Year 4 3223798 4587348 14598780 0.5718 1843217
TOTAL 10447611


The Net NPV after 4 years is 436179

(10447611 - 10011432 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10011432) -10011432 - -
Year 1 3460262 -6551170 3460262 0.8333 2883552
Year 2 3968611 -2582559 7428873 0.6944 2755980
Year 3 3946109 1363550 11374982 0.5787 2283628
Year 4 3223798 4587348 14598780 0.4823 1554687
TOTAL 9477846


The Net NPV after 4 years is -533586

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9477846 - 10011432 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Biztainment Bear to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Biztainment Bear has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Biztainment Bear can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Biztainment Bear, then the stock price of the Biztainment Bear should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Biztainment Bear should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Using "Biztainment" to Gain Competitive Advantage

References & Further Readings

Mi Kyong Newsom, David A. Collier, Eric Olsen (2018), "Using "Biztainment" to Gain Competitive Advantage Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


GIR Natureview Resorts Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Atos SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Computer Services


Hatsuho Shouji SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Constr. - Supplies & Fixtures


ACROMEC SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Capital Goods , Construction Services


Robertet SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Personal & Household Prods.


Ningbo ZhongDa Leader SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Samhyun Steel SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Iron & Steel


Benchmark Holdings SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Fish/Livestock