×




United Learning (A) Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for United Learning (A) case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. United Learning (A) case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Daniel Diermeier, Gregory L. Hughes. The United Learning (A) (referred as “Learning United” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Strategy & Execution. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Social responsibility, Strategy.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of United Learning (A) Case Study


United Learning is a family-owned leader in the K-12 supplementary teaching material market. In January 2001, United Learning realized that sales for one of its flagship products, a drug and prevention program, were rapidly deteriorating because the program was not mentioned on a recently released U.S. Department of Education list of recommended products. United Learning must decide on which action to take: regain sales or focus on its other educational products--which are also threatened by changes in the regulatory environment.


Case Authors : Daniel Diermeier, Gregory L. Hughes

Topic : Strategy & Execution

Related Areas : Social responsibility, Strategy




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for United Learning (A) Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10015765) -10015765 - -
Year 1 3468821 -6546944 3468821 0.9434 3272473
Year 2 3965737 -2581207 7434558 0.89 3529492
Year 3 3962943 1381736 11397501 0.8396 3327363
Year 4 3249217 4630953 14646718 0.7921 2573684
TOTAL 14646718 12703012




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2687247

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Profitability Index
3. Net Present Value
4. Payback Period

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Learning United shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Learning United have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of United Learning (A)

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Strategy & Execution Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Learning United often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Learning United needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10015765) -10015765 - -
Year 1 3468821 -6546944 3468821 0.8696 3016366
Year 2 3965737 -2581207 7434558 0.7561 2998667
Year 3 3962943 1381736 11397501 0.6575 2605699
Year 4 3249217 4630953 14646718 0.5718 1857750
TOTAL 10478483


The Net NPV after 4 years is 462718

(10478483 - 10015765 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10015765) -10015765 - -
Year 1 3468821 -6546944 3468821 0.8333 2890684
Year 2 3965737 -2581207 7434558 0.6944 2753984
Year 3 3962943 1381736 11397501 0.5787 2293370
Year 4 3249217 4630953 14646718 0.4823 1566945
TOTAL 9504983


The Net NPV after 4 years is -510782

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9504983 - 10015765 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Learning United to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Learning United has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Learning United can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Learning United, then the stock price of the Learning United should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Learning United should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of United Learning (A)

References & Further Readings

Daniel Diermeier, Gregory L. Hughes (2018), "United Learning (A) Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Beijing StarNeto SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Communications Equipment


It Way SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


United Cannabis SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Japara Healthcare SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Healthcare Facilities


BSE SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Conglomerates , Conglomerates


Schweitzer-Mauduit SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Paper & Paper Products


Echo International Holdings Group SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Chunil Express SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Transportation , Misc. Transportation