×




Monsanto and the Global Water Treatment Industry Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Monsanto and the Global Water Treatment Industry case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Monsanto and the Global Water Treatment Industry case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Mary M. Crossan, Dusya Vera. The Monsanto and the Global Water Treatment Industry (referred as “Water Drinking” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Strategy & Execution. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, .

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Monsanto and the Global Water Treatment Industry Case Study


Monsanto, a biotechnology giant highly committed to sustainable development efforts, needs to assess the attractiveness of the drinking water treatment industry before deciding its entry to it. Four dimensions of the global water treatment industry are described: types of products and services, applications, end users, and geographical markets. The drinking water treatment segment, which is classified into municipal drinking water treatment and residential drinking water treatment, is examined in depth. Players in these two categories produce the chemicals and equipment necessary to purify tap water supplied to consumers and residential water purification devices. The bottled water industry is considered a substitute of the drinking water treatment segment. Teaching purpose: To answer the question "Is the industry attractive?" and to introduce students to industry analysis and industry segmentation.


Case Authors : Mary M. Crossan, Dusya Vera

Topic : Strategy & Execution

Related Areas :




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Monsanto and the Global Water Treatment Industry Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10020718) -10020718 - -
Year 1 3453329 -6567389 3453329 0.9434 3257858
Year 2 3959783 -2607606 7413112 0.89 3524193
Year 3 3971490 1363884 11384602 0.8396 3334540
Year 4 3229680 4593564 14614282 0.7921 2558209
TOTAL 14614282 12674799




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2654081

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Payback Period
2. Profitability Index
3. Internal Rate of Return
4. Net Present Value

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Water Drinking shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.
2. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Water Drinking have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Monsanto and the Global Water Treatment Industry

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Strategy & Execution Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Water Drinking often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Water Drinking needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10020718) -10020718 - -
Year 1 3453329 -6567389 3453329 0.8696 3002895
Year 2 3959783 -2607606 7413112 0.7561 2994165
Year 3 3971490 1363884 11384602 0.6575 2611319
Year 4 3229680 4593564 14614282 0.5718 1846580
TOTAL 10454959


The Net NPV after 4 years is 434241

(10454959 - 10020718 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10020718) -10020718 - -
Year 1 3453329 -6567389 3453329 0.8333 2877774
Year 2 3959783 -2607606 7413112 0.6944 2749849
Year 3 3971490 1363884 11384602 0.5787 2298316
Year 4 3229680 4593564 14614282 0.4823 1557523
TOTAL 9483463


The Net NPV after 4 years is -537255

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9483463 - 10020718 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Water Drinking to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Water Drinking has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Water Drinking can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Water Drinking, then the stock price of the Water Drinking should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Water Drinking should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Monsanto and the Global Water Treatment Industry

References & Further Readings

Mary M. Crossan, Dusya Vera (2018), "Monsanto and the Global Water Treatment Industry Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Gradiente Electronica SA SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Audio & Video Equipment


China Security A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Software & Programming


Kehua Bio-Engine A SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


DIA SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Retail (Grocery)


Castec Korea SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer Cyclical , Auto & Truck Parts


Key Energy Services SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Energy , Oil Well Services & Equipment


Mothercare SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Retail (Apparel)


Renewables SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Financial , Misc. Financial Services


Agilent Technologies SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Scientific & Technical Instr.


GMR Materials SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Waste Management Services