Newmont Mining Corp. and a Mercury Spill in Peru (B) Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Newmont Mining Corp. and a Mercury Spill in Peru (B) case study

At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Newmont Mining Corp. and a Mercury Spill in Peru (B) case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Jaana Woiceshyn, Allan Ingelson. The Newmont Mining Corp. and a Mercury Spill in Peru (B) (referred as “Newmont Spill” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Strategy & Execution. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, .

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment

---

Case Description of Newmont Mining Corp. and a Mercury Spill in Peru (B) Case Study

This B case is a supplement to Newmont Mining Corp. and a Mercury Spill in Peru (A) 9B13M002. Since the spill, Newmont spent more than US$100 million on compensation and improvements to the mine to reduce its environmental impact and prevent further spills. An internal audit concluded environmental standards at the mine were seriously lacking. In-house counsel warned other executives about the possibility of criminal liability. Despite improvements at the mine, a large local protest prevented Newmont from expanding its operations in the area. Lack of trust by the locals contributed to the protest. The new CEO is trying to decide what else Newmont is morally required to implement before continuing to operate Yanacocha, and Newmont's other mines, successfully. Authors Jaana Woiceshyn and Allan Ingelson are affiliated with the University of Calgary.

Case Authors : Jaana Woiceshyn, Allan Ingelson

Topic : Strategy & Execution

Related Areas :

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Newmont Mining Corp. and a Mercury Spill in Peru (B) Case Study

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 6 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10011841)	-10011841	-	-
Year 1	3467392	-6544449	3467392	0.9434	3271125
Year 2	3957415	-2587034	7424807	0.89	3522085
Year 3	3953045	1366011	11377852	0.8396	3319053
Year 4	3226855	4592866	14604707	0.7921	2555971
TOTAL			14604707		12668234

The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2656393

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting

What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.

---

Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting

There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Payback Period
3. Net Present Value
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Newmont Spill have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Newmont Spill shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.

---

Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Newmont Mining Corp. and a Mercury Spill in Peru (B)

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Strategy & Execution Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Newmont Spill often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Newmont Spill needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 15 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10011841)	-10011841	-	-
Year 1	3467392	-6544449	3467392	0.8696	3015123
Year 2	3957415	-2587034	7424807	0.7561	2992374
Year 3	3953045	1366011	11377852	0.6575	2599191
Year 4	3226855	4592866	14604707	0.5718	1844965
TOTAL					10451654

The Net NPV after 4 years is 439813

(10451654 - 10011841 )

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%

If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 20 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10011841)	-10011841	-	-
Year 1	3467392	-6544449	3467392	0.8333	2889493
Year 2	3957415	-2587034	7424807	0.6944	2748205
Year 3	3953045	1366011	11377852	0.5787	2287642
Year 4	3226855	4592866	14604707	0.4823	1556161
TOTAL					9481501

The Net NPV after 4 years is -530340

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9481501 - 10011841 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Newmont Spill to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.

Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Newmont Spill has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Newmont Spill can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Newmont Spill, then the stock price of the Newmont Spill should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Newmont Spill should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.

---

Negotiation Strategy of Newmont Mining Corp. and a Mercury Spill in Peru (B)

References & Further Readings

Jaana Woiceshyn, Allan Ingelson (2018), "Newmont Mining Corp. and a Mercury Spill in Peru (B) Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.