Tale of Two Cities: Water Supply in Hong Kong and Macau Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Tale of Two Cities: Water Supply in Hong Kong and Macau case study

At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Tale of Two Cities: Water Supply in Hong Kong and Macau case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Yue-Cheong Chan, Pun-Lee Lam, Alexandra Yiu, Ka-Fu Wong. The Tale of Two Cities: Water Supply in Hong Kong and Macau (referred as “Water Hong” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Strategy & Execution. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Mergers & acquisitions.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment

---

Case Description of Tale of Two Cities: Water Supply in Hong Kong and Macau Case Study

Investigates the role of the private sector in improving the operating performance of a water utility. Compares the productivity of Water Supply Department and Macau's Water Supply Co. in supplying water to Hong Kong and Macau, respectively. Water service in Hong Kong is vertically separated into potable water supply, sewage treatment, and drainage, each carried out by different government departments. Identifies reasons for inefficiencies in Hong Kong's publicly owned water utility. Describes successful privatization experience for vertically integrated water utilities in the United Kingdom and other contractual models of water services provision in France and the United States. The findings provide a factual base for discussions on government policy and business strategy.

Case Authors : Yue-Cheong Chan, Pun-Lee Lam, Alexandra Yiu, Ka-Fu Wong

Topic : Strategy & Execution

Related Areas : Mergers & acquisitions

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Tale of Two Cities: Water Supply in Hong Kong and Macau Case Study

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 6 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10015003)	-10015003	-	-
Year 1	3454498	-6560505	3454498	0.9434	3258960
Year 2	3975725	-2584780	7430223	0.89	3538381
Year 3	3951726	1366946	11381949	0.8396	3317945
Year 4	3228576	4595522	14610525	0.7921	2557335
TOTAL			14610525		12672621

The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2657618

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting

What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.

---

Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting

There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Net Present Value
3. Payback Period
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Water Hong have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Water Hong shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.

---

Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Tale of Two Cities: Water Supply in Hong Kong and Macau

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Strategy & Execution Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Water Hong often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Water Hong needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 15 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10015003)	-10015003	-	-
Year 1	3454498	-6560505	3454498	0.8696	3003911
Year 2	3975725	-2584780	7430223	0.7561	3006219
Year 3	3951726	1366946	11381949	0.6575	2598324
Year 4	3228576	4595522	14610525	0.5718	1845949
TOTAL					10454403

The Net NPV after 4 years is 439400

(10454403 - 10015003 )

---

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%

If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years	Cash Flow	Net Cash Flow	Cumulative     Cash Flow	Discount Rate @ 20 %	Discounted Cash Flows
Year 0	(10015003)	-10015003	-	-
Year 1	3454498	-6560505	3454498	0.8333	2878748
Year 2	3975725	-2584780	7430223	0.6944	2760920
Year 3	3951726	1366946	11381949	0.5787	2286878
Year 4	3228576	4595522	14610525	0.4823	1556991
TOTAL					9483538

The Net NPV after 4 years is -531465

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9483538 - 10015003 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Water Hong to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.

Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Water Hong has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Water Hong can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Water Hong, then the stock price of the Water Hong should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Water Hong should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.

---

Negotiation Strategy of Tale of Two Cities: Water Supply in Hong Kong and Macau

References & Further Readings

Yue-Cheong Chan, Pun-Lee Lam, Alexandra Yiu, Ka-Fu Wong (2018), "Tale of Two Cities: Water Supply in Hong Kong and Macau Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.