×




Lincoln Electric: Venturing Abroad Net Present Value (NPV) / MBA Resources

Introduction to Net Present Value (NPV) - What is Net Present Value (NPV) ? How it impacts financial decisions regarding project management?

NPV solution for Lincoln Electric: Venturing Abroad case study


At Oak Spring University, we provide corporate level professional Net Present Value (NPV) case study solution. Lincoln Electric: Venturing Abroad case study is a Harvard Business School (HBR) case study written by Christopher A. Bartlett, Jamie O'Connell. The Lincoln Electric: Venturing Abroad (referred as “Lincoln Massaro” from here on) case study provides evaluation & decision scenario in field of Strategy & Execution. It also touches upon business topics such as - Value proposition, Globalization, Growth strategy, Labor, Manufacturing, Marketing, Motivating people, Reorganization, Strategy execution.

The net present value (NPV) of an investment proposal is the present value of the proposal’s net cash flows less the proposal’s initial cash outflow. If a project’s NPV is greater than or equal to zero, the project should be accepted.

NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows LESS Project’s Initial Investment






Case Description of Lincoln Electric: Venturing Abroad Case Study


Lincoln Electric, a 100-year-old manufacturer of welding equipment and consumables based in Cleveland, Ohio, motivates its U.S. employees through a culture of cooperation between management and labor and an unusual compensation system based on piecework and a large bonus based on individual contribution to the company's performance. Despite opening a few international sales and production ventures in Canada, Australia, and France, Lincoln remained focused on manufacturing in the United States until 1988. At that time, the company's new CEO expanded manufacturing through acquisitions and greenfields in 11 new countries, attempting to transfer its unique management philosophy to each. However, Lincoln was unable to replicate its highly productive system abroad. Operational problems led to a major restructuring in the early 1990s, supervised by Anthony Massaro, a newcomer to the company. In 1996, Massaro was named CEO and set about expanding the company's manufacturing base through a new strategy. The case concludes in Asia, where Lincoln's regional president is trying to decide whether and how to establish a manufacturing presence in Indonesia, and in particular whether to try to transfer Lincoln's unique incentive-driven management system.


Case Authors : Christopher A. Bartlett, Jamie O'Connell

Topic : Strategy & Execution

Related Areas : Globalization, Growth strategy, Labor, Manufacturing, Marketing, Motivating people, Reorganization, Strategy execution




Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 6% for Lincoln Electric: Venturing Abroad Case Study


Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 6 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10020209) -10020209 - -
Year 1 3472033 -6548176 3472033 0.9434 3275503
Year 2 3966163 -2582013 7438196 0.89 3529871
Year 3 3975737 1393724 11413933 0.8396 3338105
Year 4 3243560 4637284 14657493 0.7921 2569203
TOTAL 14657493 12712683




The Net Present Value at 6% discount rate is 2692474

In isolation the NPV number doesn't mean much but put in right context then it is one of the best method to evaluate project returns. In this article we will cover -

Different methods of capital budgeting


What is NPV & Formula of NPV,
How it is calculated,
How to use NPV number for project evaluation, and
Scenario Planning given risks and management priorities.




Capital Budgeting Approaches

Methods of Capital Budgeting


There are four types of capital budgeting techniques that are widely used in the corporate world –

1. Internal Rate of Return
2. Payback Period
3. Net Present Value
4. Profitability Index

Apart from the Payback period method which is an additive method, rest of the methods are based on Discounted Cash Flow technique. Even though cash flow can be calculated based on the nature of the project, for the simplicity of the article we are assuming that all the expected cash flows are realized at the end of the year.

Discounted Cash Flow approaches provide a more objective basis for evaluating and selecting investment projects. They take into consideration both –

1. Timing of the expected cash flows – stockholders of Lincoln Massaro have higher preference for cash returns over 4-5 years rather than 10-15 years given the nature of the volatility in the industry.
2. Magnitude of both incoming and outgoing cash flows – Projects can be capital intensive, time intensive, or both. Lincoln Massaro shareholders have preference for diversified projects investment rather than prospective high income from a single capital intensive project.






Formula and Steps to Calculate Net Present Value (NPV) of Lincoln Electric: Venturing Abroad

NPV = Net Cash In Flowt1 / (1+r)t1 + Net Cash In Flowt2 / (1+r)t2 + … Net Cash In Flowtn / (1+r)tn
Less Net Cash Out Flowt0 / (1+r)t0

Where t = time period, in this case year 1, year 2 and so on.
r = discount rate or return that could be earned using other safe proposition such as fixed deposit or treasury bond rate. Net Cash In Flow – What the firm will get each year.
Net Cash Out Flow – What the firm needs to invest initially in the project.

Step 1 – Understand the nature of the project and calculate cash flow for each year.
Step 2 – Discount those cash flow based on the discount rate.
Step 3 – Add all the discounted cash flow.
Step 4 – Selection of the project

Why Strategy & Execution Managers need to know Financial Tools such as Net Present Value (NPV)?

In our daily workplace we often come across people and colleagues who are just focused on their core competency and targets they have to deliver. For example marketing managers at Lincoln Massaro often design programs whose objective is to drive brand awareness and customer reach. But how that 30 point increase in brand awareness or 10 point increase in customer touch points will result into shareholders’ value is not specified.

To overcome such scenarios managers at Lincoln Massaro needs to not only know the financial aspect of project management but also needs to have tools to integrate them into part of the project development and monitoring plan.

Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 15%

After working through various assumptions we reached a conclusion that risk is far higher than 6%. In a reasonably stable industry with weak competition - 15% discount rate can be a good benchmark.



Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 15 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10020209) -10020209 - -
Year 1 3472033 -6548176 3472033 0.8696 3019159
Year 2 3966163 -2582013 7438196 0.7561 2998989
Year 3 3975737 1393724 11413933 0.6575 2614112
Year 4 3243560 4637284 14657493 0.5718 1854516
TOTAL 10486776


The Net NPV after 4 years is 466567

(10486776 - 10020209 )








Calculating Net Present Value (NPV) at 20%


If the risk component is high in the industry then we should go for a higher hurdle rate / discount rate of 20%.

Years              Cash Flow     Net Cash Flow     Cumulative    
Cash Flow
Discount Rate
@ 20 %
Discounted
Cash Flows
Year 0 (10020209) -10020209 - -
Year 1 3472033 -6548176 3472033 0.8333 2893361
Year 2 3966163 -2582013 7438196 0.6944 2754280
Year 3 3975737 1393724 11413933 0.5787 2300774
Year 4 3243560 4637284 14657493 0.4823 1564217
TOTAL 9512631


The Net NPV after 4 years is -507578

At 20% discount rate the NPV is negative (9512631 - 10020209 ) so ideally we can't select the project if macro and micro factors don't allow financial managers of Lincoln Massaro to discount cash flow at lower discount rates such as 15%.





Acceptance Criteria of a Project based on NPV

Simplest Approach – If the investment project of Lincoln Massaro has a NPV value higher than Zero then finance managers at Lincoln Massaro can ACCEPT the project, otherwise they can reject the project. This means that project will deliver higher returns over the period of time than any alternate investment strategy.

In theory if the required rate of return or discount rate is chosen correctly by finance managers at Lincoln Massaro, then the stock price of the Lincoln Massaro should change by same amount of the NPV. In real world we know that share price also reflects various other factors that can be related to both macro and micro environment.

In the same vein – accepting the project with zero NPV should result in stagnant share price. Finance managers use discount rates as a measure of risk components in the project execution process.

Sensitivity Analysis

Project selection is often a far more complex decision than just choosing it based on the NPV number. Finance managers at Lincoln Massaro should conduct a sensitivity analysis to better understand not only the inherent risk of the projects but also how those risks can be either factored in or mitigated during the project execution. Sensitivity analysis helps in –

What are the key aspects of the projects that need to be monitored, refined, and retuned for continuous delivery of projected cash flows.

What are the uncertainties surrounding the project Initial Cash Outlay (ICO’s). ICO’s often have several different components such as land, machinery, building, and other equipment.

Understanding of risks involved in the project.

What can impact the cash flow of the project.

What will be a multi year spillover effect of various taxation regulations.

Some of the assumptions while using the Discounted Cash Flow Methods –

Projects are assumed to be Mutually Exclusive – This is seldom the came in modern day giant organizations where projects are often inter-related and rejecting a project solely based on NPV can result in sunk cost from a related project.

Independent projects have independent cash flows – As explained in the marketing project – though the project may look independent but in reality it is not as the brand awareness project can be closely associated with the spending on sales promotions and product specific advertising.






Negotiation Strategy of Lincoln Electric: Venturing Abroad

References & Further Readings

Christopher A. Bartlett, Jamie O'Connell (2018), "Lincoln Electric: Venturing Abroad Harvard Business Review Case Study. Published by HBR Publications.


Noevir Holdings SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Personal & Household Prods.


Comba Telecom Systems SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Communications Equipment


Takaoka Toko Co Ltd SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Technology , Electronic Instr. & Controls


Anavex Life Sciences SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Healthcare , Biotechnology & Drugs


Gujarat NRE Coke SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Basic Materials , Iron & Steel


PCG Entertainment SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Services , Recreational Activities


Beijing Sanyuan Foods SWOT Analysis / TOWS Matrix

Consumer/Non-Cyclical , Food Processing